Cases

*65SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Tyrell Evans, Robert Thomas, and Craig Moye appeal judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Hall, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the record of prior proceedings. A. Tyrell Evans Evans, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute c

SUMMARY ORDER We issued a Summary Order dated September 18, 2008, remanding this case with *443respect to Tyrell Evans and requesting clarification as to whether the district court understood the extent of its discretion under Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85,128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), to impose a non-Guidelines sentence. See United States v. Eva

SUMMARY ORDER We issued a Summary Order dated September 18, 2008, remanding this case with *443respect to Tyrell Evans and requesting clarification as to whether the district court understood the extent of its discretion under Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85,128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), to impose a non-Guidelines sentence. See United States v. Eva

*552ORDER KRISTEN L. MIX, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony of Defendant Richard E. Schaden [Docket No. 206; Filed September 26, 2008] (the “Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, Defendants’ Response [Docket No. 246; Filed October 16, 2008], Plaintiffs’ Reply [Do

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-13-00033-CV HELEN BUTTS TIPPS, SUE ETHEL MCEACHERN, ESTATE OF FLORA L. THOMPSON, PERRY THOMPSON, JR., INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR, PERRY THOMPSON, JR., AND SANDRA SUE SARTAIN, Appellants V. CHINN EXPLORATION COMPANY AND CHEROKEE ROYALTY SYNDICATE, HOWARD P. COGHLAN, RECEIVER, Appellees

ORDER MOYE, District Judge. In a petition for naturalization filed by Wiebke Klarita Helene Thomsen, the Court is confronted with the issue of whether petitioner’s refusal to take an oath obligating her “to bear arms on behalf of the United States” precludes her from satisfying the oath requirements of Section 337(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the taking of which oath is requisite to citiz

ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robert Worrall as Guardian for and on behalf of Helen Worrall (Guardian), a resident of either the State of Ohio or the Commonwealth of Virginia, originally filed the instant action in the General Division of the Butler County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas seeking judicial relief against defendant James Irwin, a resident of Wayne County, Indiana, d

691 P.2d 1148 (1984) ELK RIVER ASSOCIATES, a Colorado limited partnership, Donald W. Cook and Eugene Frink, as general partners of Elk River Associates and as limited partners of Elk River Associates, Donald W. Cook and Eugene Frink as representative parties in behalf of the class of persons who are limited partners of Elk River Associates, to-wit: Fred J. Beck, Jack R. Smolenski, Rex Willoughby, Eugene H. Frink, John Armstrong, Bernard T. Witkin and Sha

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2246 Doc: 31 Filed: 05/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2246 WILLIAM NILE ELAM, III, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEPHEN TIMOTHY EARLY; MICHAEL S. EARLY; SUZANNE J. EARLY, Defend

OPINION OF THE COURT ALDISERT, Circuit Judge. In the midst of an action seeking damages for violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the district court, 352 F.Supp. 1000, issued a preliminary injunction restraining the appellant Boenning from executing on a state court judgment entered by confes

218 S.E.2d 471 (1975) 27 N.C. App. 173 Haywood RODGERSON, Jr., et al. v. Robert L. DAVIS et al. No. 752DC387. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 15, 1975. Discretionary Review Denied December 2, 1975. *474 Carter & Archie by W. B. Carter, Jr., Washington, for plaintiffs-appell

521 F.2d 1201 13 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1740,10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,352Helen L. BURT, Appellee,v.The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EDGEFIELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT etal., Plaintiffs,C. Ashley Abel et al., Appellants.Helen L. BURT, Appellant,v.The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EDGEFIELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT etal., Plaintiffs,C. Ashley Abel et al., Appellees. Nos. 73-2363, 73-2364.

The appellants are the defendants Alabama Department of Corrections; Edwin Henry, the warden of the Frank Lee Youth Center; and Deborah Haynes and Christopher Thomas, correctional officers at the Frank Lee Youth Center. Pursuant to Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P., we granted permission for these defendants to appeal the interlocutory order of the trial court denying their motion for summary judgment. Their motion for summary judgment was grounded on their claims of absolute and state-agent immun

497 F.3d 1244 (2007) Frank E. ADAIR, Cynthia A. Adams, Joseph Aldridge, Emory T. Allen, Jodee B. Anderson, Alfredo Arias, Joseph W. Arnett, Lisa D. Ayres, Clyde J. Baker, Sr., Paul E. Barnard, Charles M. Bell, Anthony O. Benjamin, Roy E. Beverly, Archie S. Boatright, Jr., Terry James Boulineau, John Bradford, Mary Ann Branch, Danny L. Brantley, Jodi Britt, Yancie W. Britt, Michael E. Brown, Prentice Kerry Brown, Willie M. Brown, Donret G. Buckley, Gregor

988 S.W.2d 423 (1999) HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Texas Department of Transportation, and Brazoria Drainage District No. 4, Appellants, v. Doyle ADAM, Wanda Adam, Patricia Ann Adams, Fernando R. Aguilar, Carolyn S. Aguilar, Charles Aiken, Julieann Aiken, Ronald E. Alford, Joann Alford, Kenneth Allen, Monzelle Allen, Antonio Almaguer, Linda Almaguer, Jose A. Alvarez, Derward L. Amacker, Donna R. Amacker, Rodolfo Aparicio, Dianna Aparicio

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM JENNINGS CHOYCE, Defendant and Appellant. S169090 San Joaquin County Superior Court SF98079A July 21, 2025 Justice Evans authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justic

McQUADE, Justice. This case arises out of a proceeding in the small claims department of a justice court. Helen Pierce, defendant in the small claims proceeding and plaintiff herein, seeks damages from the justice of the peace and his surety for wrongful attachment. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the wrongful attachment proceeding in district court, plaintiff and defendants. B.

AMENDED ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. I. Background..............................................................1336 A. Church of Scientology .................................................1337 B. Subject Property and CSI’s Space Requirements..........................1339 C. Rezoning Application.......................................

PER CURIAM: For reasons stated in our separate opinions, we join in the following decision: We unanimously agree to vacate the judgment below and remand for further proceedings. On remand, the district court will comply with the directions contained in Judge Craven’s opinion, which has the support of Judge Winter, except with respect to the measure of dam

CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. This maritime matter was tried without a jury on March 9, 1970. On September 30, 1970, the court found that the defendant’s barge had been unseaworthy and that that unseaworthiness was a proximate cause of plaintiff Mock’s injuries. After additional consideration of the question of damages, *470the court, on September 27, 1971, awarded p