Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Helen J. Meredith”
State v. Meredithpublic domain
226 P.3d 571 (2010) 2010 MT 27 355 Mont. 148 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Gene Richard MEREDITH, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 08-0366. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs June 17, 2009. Decided February 9, 2010. *574 For Appellant: Robin
K.G. v. Meredithpublic domain
*168Opinion BRUINIERS, J. —Petitioners K.G. and Donna H. were determined to be gravely disabled persons under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS Act) (Well. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq.)1 and were subject to conservatorships. Orders establishing the conservatorships divested them of the right to make their own decisions
Simonian v. Allergan, Inc.public domain
757 F.Supp.2d 785 (2010) Thomas A. SIMONIAN, Relator, v. ALLERGAN, INC., Defendant. No. 10 C 02414. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 30, 2010. *786 Joseph Michael Vanek, John Paul Bjork, Vanek, Vickers & Masini, P.C., Martin Goering, Eugene M. Cummings, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Relator.
Weber v. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc.public domain
RULING ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. Following a jury trial held May 18 through June 5, 2012, the jury returned a verdict on June 11, 2012 finding Defendant FujiFilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. (“FMSU”) liable on Plaintiff John Weber’s claimed breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and finding Defendants FujiFilm Holdings America C
Newsome v. Newsomepublic domain
984 So.2d 463 (2007) Amos M. NEWSOME, Jr. v. May Helen NEWSOME. No. 2060484. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. November 16, 2007. *464 Benjamin E. Meredith, Dothan, for appellant. Joel M. Nomberg of Nomberg & Maddox, P.C., Dothan, for appellee. THOMAS, Judge. Amos M. Newsome, Jr. ("the former husband"),
Weber v. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc.public domain
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. On July 21, 2010, Plaintiff John J. Weber filed a Third Amended Complaint against FujiFilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. (“FMSU”), Hiroaki Tada, FujiFilm Holdings American Corporation (“HLUS”), FujiFilm Holdings Corporation (“FH”),1 and FujiFilm Corporation claiming a variety of causes of ac
Hendrickson v. Meredithpublic domain
161 Va. 193 (1933) HELEN E. HENDRICKSON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF GEORGE W. MEREDITH, DECEASED, v. MARY MEREDITH. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 21, 1933. J. L. Dillow and W. B. Snidow, for the plaintiff in error. Williams & Farrier, for the defendant in error. Present, Campbell, C.J., and Holt, Epes, Hudgins, Gregory and Browning, JJ. 1. SPECIFIC PERFORMANC
283 F.3d 226 C.L. RITTER LUMBER COMPANY, INCORPORATED; Coal Mountain Trust; Hurt-Mc Guire Land Trust; James M. McGuire Land Trust; Hugh Macrae Land Trust; Buckhorn Coal Company; Buchanan Coal Company; Sayers Pocahontas Coal Company;Yukon Pocahontas Company; Georgia Pacific Corporation; Garret K. Franks; Linda Schrack, Administrator of the estate of Nermal S. Whited; Sue Snyder, Administrator of the estate of Nermal S. Whited; Mary Russell, Admi
McKAY, Circuit Judge. The dispute in this case involves interest earned on block grants made to Indian tribes pursuant to the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996, 25 U.S.C. §§ 4101-4243. Specifically, Appellant Muscogee (Creek) Nation Division of Housing challenges both a regulation placing a two-year limit on the investment of grant funds and two notices issued by-the U.S. Department of Housi
Brady v. Fibreboard Corp.public domain
71 Wn. App. 280 (1993) 857 P.2d 1094 HELEN J. BRADY, Individually and as Executrix, Appellant, v. FIBREBOARD CORP., ET AL, Respondents. No. 15764-1-II. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two. September 14, 1993. *281 William J. Rutzick and Schroeter Goldmark & Bender P.S., for a
Gootnick v. Gootnickpublic domain
Gootnick v Gootnick (2025 NY Slip Op 04882) Gootnick v Gootnick 2025 NY Slip Op 04882 Decided on September 10, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion
Cottom v. Meredith Corp.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Simons, J. Plaintiff seeks damages from defendants, the owner and operator of a commercial television station and its reporter, alleging that they defamed him in reporting the details of a private dispute between him and his tenant. Special Term granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, holding that the subject matter of their television broadcast was "arguably within the sphere o
Dynasteel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: An administrative law judge (ALJ) found that Dynasteel Corporation engaged in a number of unfair labor practices in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-69. The unfair practices arose out of Dynasteel’s discrimination against employees and prospective employees affiliated with labor unions. The National Labor Relations Bo
Picard v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.public domain
460 B.R. 84 (2011) Irving H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd., Defendants. Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Plaintiff, v. UBS AG, et al., Defendants. Nos. 11 civ. 913(CM), 11 ci
King v. Daltonpublic domain
895 F.Supp. 831 (1995) Stephanie J. KING, Plaintiff, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 95-250-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. July 28, 1995. *832 *833 *834 Paul J. Kennedy, Kip Sch
Hastings v. Turnerpublic domain
45 A.3d 835 (2012) 205 Md. App. 413 Direse Helen HASTINGS v. Catherine Lynn TURNER. No. 2448, September Term, 2010. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 5, 2012. Ernest I. Cornbrooks, III & Roscoe R. Leslie (Webb, Burnett, Cornbrooks, Wilber, Vorhis, Douse & Mason, LLP, on the brief), Salisbury, MD, for appellant.
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Raymond and Helen Zajac, a North Dakota farm couple, appeal from a decision of the district court holding that the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (Act) does not provide the Zajacs with a private right of action to enjoin the Federal Land Bank of St. Paul (Bank) from foreclosing on the Zajacs’ property until the Bank honors their request that an independent appraiser be appointed to appraise the
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
Chapa v. United States Fire Insurance Co.public domain
644 S.W.2d 823 (1982) Helen CHAPA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO., Appellee. No. 1946cv. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. September 23, 1982. Rehearing Denied October 21, 1982. *824 J. Kenneth Dahlberg, Jr., Corpus Christi, for appellant. William A. Abernethy, Meredith & Donne
Stitzel v. Statepublic domain
MEREDITH, J. In this appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Washington County, we review an agricultural land preservation easement that was granted pursuant to Maryland Code (1973, 1999 Repl.Vol.), Agriculture Article (“AG”), §§ 2-501, et seq. We shall affirm the circuit court’s conclusion that the landowner who had subjected 264 acres of his property to a preservation easement was prohibited from conveying,