Cases

PER CURIAM. On the main appeal, we affirm the circuit court’s final judgment, including its well-detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Competent, substantial evidence exists in the record to support the court’s ultimate conclusion that appellee rebutted the presumption of undue influence. Because we affirm on the main appeal, the appellee’s cross-appeal is moot. Affirmed.

732 N.E.2d 11 (2000) 314 Ill. App.3d 476 247 Ill.Dec. 295 In re Parentage of Bremen Hall MELTON (Lynn M. Hall, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brace L. Melton, Respondent-Appellee). No. 1-99-2463. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. May 30, 2000. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 11, 2000.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 16, 2002 Session HELEN LOUISE HALL v. JAMES WILLIAM HALL A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Tipton County No. 17,456 The Honorable Martha B. Brasfield, Chancellor No. W2002-00786-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 19, 2002 Plaintiff-wife sued defendant husband

662 F.Supp. 468 (1987) Helen K. HALL and Mary Jeanne Hall, Plaintiffs, v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE SECURITIES, INC., Scott Miller, and Peter Martinez, Defendants. No. CV 86-5520-ER(Kx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 30, 1987. *469 Fred Rucker, Rucker & Clarkson, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs. John A.

[Cite as In re K.M.W., 2021-Ohio-736.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : IN RE: K.M.W., K.D.W., K.M.W. : : Appellate Case No. 28971 : : Trial Court

PER CURIAM. Defendant, a juvenile, argues that trial court erred in adjudicating him delinquent upon finding he had committed the offense of loitering and prowling, in violation of section 856.021, Florida Statutes (1991). He argues that the evidence of loitering and prowling was legally insufficient. We reverse. In response to a report of an automobile theft in progress at a funeral parlor in downtown

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Where an accused’s supposed consent to a police search of his person or property is at issue, the law is clear that the reviewing court must examine the totality of the circumstances to ensure that the consent was voluntarily given. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 227, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2047-48, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973). A court should consider (1) the persona

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 16, 2013 Session HELEN STEWART v. CADNA RUBBER COMPANY An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-001649-11 Kay S. Robilio, Judge No. W2013-00670-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 26, 2014 This is an employment discrimination case. The employment of the plaintiff employee was termi

[Cite as In re J.K.O., 2021-Ohio-1215.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: J.K.O. : : : Appellate Case No. 28899 : :

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge HALL and Judge HALLANAN joined. OPINION ERVIN, Circuit Judge: I William Barry Robinson (Robinson) appeals from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons hereinafter s

770 P.2d 24 (1989) Helen Jenean BURK, Plaintiff, v. K-MART CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 67785. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 7, 1989. Earl W. Wolfe, Tulsa, for plaintiff. Doerner, Stuart, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson by Lynn Paul Mattson, Charles S. Plumb and Kathy R. Neal, Tulsa, for defendant. Redwine and Kappel by Henry W. Kappel, Norman, fo

On January 17, 2007, Etinosa Edosomwan, a four-year-old boy, was enrolled at A.B.C. Daycare and Kindergarten, Inc. ("the day-care facility"). As Etinosa got up from his nap cot, which was three inches above the floor, he tripped or became tangled in the sheet covering his nap cot. Etinosa fell, and he began crying. One of the teachers assigned to Etinosa's room, Essence Lewis, responded to Etinosa's cries by coming to his assistance. She asked if he could walk, and Etinosa told her th

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 19, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH DUANE HALL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 98674 Mary Beth Leibowitz, Judge No. E2014-02078-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 30, 2015 The Defendant, Kenneth Duane Hall, was found guilty by a Knox County C

Karen B. Molzen, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.'s ("PHP's") Motion for Summary Judgment on Federal Defenses (Doc. 40 ), filed September 18, 2017. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b), the parties have consente

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 2, 2010 Session BOBBY R. HOPKINS v. DOYLE K. RIGGS, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Blount County No. 04-081 W. Dale Young, Judge Sitting By Interchange No. E2008-02811-COA-R3-CV - FILED APRIL 15, 2010 Bobby R. Hopkins (“Hopkins”) sued Doyle K. Riggs and Ruth Riggs1 (“the

984 S.W.2d 617 (1998) Mary F. HALL and Don K. Hall, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Mary Rose PIPPIN and Dale Delaney, Defendants/Appellants. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. September 23, 1998. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied January 25, 1999. *618 Manuel F. Edwards, Cookeville, T. Michael O'Mara

OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. This case involves the tragic death in 2008 of Albert DiFederieo that resulted from a terrorist attack in Pakistan on the Marriott Islamabad Hotel (“Hotel”).1 At the time, Mr. DiFederieo was serving in that country as a civilian contractor for the State. Department. Procedural Background

GENOVESE, Judge. Lin this wrongful death and survival action, Plaintiff, Tracey D. Kulka, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, Shag II, Inc., d/b/a The Bulldog Pool Hall, and James R. Gautreaux. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff, Tracey Kulka, is the mother of Kaine Kulka, who either fell or jumpe

MARING, Justice. [¶ 1] B.D.H., by and through his parents, next of friends and natural legal guardians, S.K.L. and C.S.H., and S.K.L. and C.S.H., individually, (“plaintiffs”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their malpractice action against Dr. Margaret Mickelson, Dr. Nathaniel Karlins, MeritCare Health System, and MeritCare Hospital (“doctors”). The plaintiffs argue B.D.H.’s wrongful life claim, which they define as

PRESIDING JUSTICE McNULTY delivered the opinion of the court: This case, concerning the support for and visitation with Bremen Hall Melton, comes before us for a second time. During the pendency of the prior interlocutory appeal, the trial court modified its initial support and visitation order, and then the co