Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ulises Johnathan Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raphael Garcia, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portio

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Garcia has moved for leave to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflect

PER CURIAM: A jury convicted Wilberth Medina Garcia of illegal reentry. Garcia now appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court erred by (1) permitting the government to bolster the credibility of its declarants improperly, (2) overruling Garcia's hearsay and Confrontation Clause objections to the government's evidence, and (3) denying Garcia's motion for a new trial predicat

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: Jaime Shakur Garcia pleaded guilty to one count of Hobbs Act robbery and one count of possessing and discharging a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence. In calculating Garcia’s sentence for the Hobbs Act robbery count, the district court applied a sentencing enhancement based on the assessment that Garcia and his codefendants had physical

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Angel Alberto Prieto-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Prieto-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portion

PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Fernando Vierra-Garcia raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 228, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Francisco Hernandez-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Luis Garcia-Andrade has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Garcia-Andrade has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

PER CURIAM: Victor Garcia-Carrillo pled guilty to reentering the United States illegally and was sentenced to 89 months of imprisonment. The Government declined to move in the district court for a one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 3El.l(b) because Garcia-Carrillo refused to waive his right to appeal. After sentencing, and while his appeal was pend

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER and COOMER, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL F

NUMBER 13-19-00288-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ EVA MARIE HENDRIX, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ______________

Opinion MURRAY, J. Defendant Richard Eugene Hendrix was convicted of resisting an executive officer by use of force or violence in the performance of his duty in violation of Penal Code section 69. In a separate bench trial, the court found true an alleged prior strike. Defendant was sentenced to six years in state prison. Defendant’s first trial ended in a mistrial when the jury declared i

FILED Apr 18 2024, 9:00 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

Filed 12/12/24; certified for publication 12/31/24 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D082237 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCD288314) v. ANGEL GARCIA et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from judgments of th

Case: 24-60590 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-60590 September 12, 2025 ____________

*539 ORDER SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge. The Mexican migrant worker plaintiffs in this farmworker rights case1 move for a protective order against the Hendrix defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(1) notice requiring them to travel from afar (mostly Mexico) to Statesboro, Georgia (office of defense counsel). D

Opinion filed December 31, 2018 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-16-00347-CR __________ VICTORIA GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 39th District Court Haskell Co

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00740-CR Fernando CANO-GARCIA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 7, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01256-CR JUSTIN LEE GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 2