Cases

PER CURIAM: The present case is an action for contribution brought by Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) against Royal Globe Insurance Company. The suit arose from vehicular collision in New Orleans in which GEICO’s insured, a Mrs. Keenan, struck a vehicle driven by a Mr. Lloyd Walker. The Walke

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant Adel Tawfik Khattab (“Khattab”) has moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) for leave to amend his answer to add as an affirmative defense the failure of plaintiffs to join Hertz Corporation (“Hertz”) as an indispensable party to this lawsuit. Khattab also moves for dismissal under Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(e) on the grounds that if Hertz is joined as a defendant, there

543 F.Supp. 502 (1981) Helen Porter SIMON, Plaintiff, v. A. H. ROBINS CO., INC. and Paul Packer, Defendants. No. 79 Civ. 1481-CLB. United States District Court, S. D. New York. December 4, 1981. Fuchsberg & Fuchsberg, New York City, for plaintiff; Lawrence Singer and Annie Kaplan, New York City, of counsel. Gair, Gair & Conason, New York City, for Rob

PER CURIAM: The opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles S. Haight, Jr. Judge, dated December 6, 1990, is reversed and the order of the bankruptcy court dated August 7, 1989 is affirmed for substantially the reasons set forth in the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Burton R. Lifland, Chief Judge, </

439 F.Supp.2d 255 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Nat SCHLESINGER, also known as "Naftule Schlesinger" and "Zvi Pollack," Herman Niederman, and Goodmark Industries, Inc., Defendants. Criminal No. 02-485 (ADS)(ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 26, 2006. *256 Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Ea

46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e

Jacob Markowitz, J. This is an application by plaintiff for an order compelling the service of a verified statement pursuant to section 76 of the Lien Law. The application is opposed by Beekman Downtown Hospital and Diesel Construction Oorp. who jointly cross-move for a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103. Movant here has commenced an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed against Beekman and by a sep

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IRVING FIREMEN’S RELIEF & No. 19-16667 RETIREMENT FUND, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-05558- v. HSG UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; TRAVIS KALANICK, OPINION Defendants-Appellees, MORGAN STANLEY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.; NEW RIDERS LP,

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiff Intesa Sanpaolo, S.p.A., (“Intesa” or “Plaintiff’) filed an amended complaint on June 22, 2012, (the “FAC”) asserting federal securities fraud claims and state law claims for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud and civil conspiracy against the following defendants: (i) Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Credit Agricole Securities (U.S.A.) Inc. (

MEMORANDUM DECISION HANNAH L. BLUMENSTIEL, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION This adversary proceeding came before the Court for trial on the complaint of Plaintiffs Tradex Global Master Fund SPC, Ltd. and Tradex Global Advisors LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Defendant Benjamin Pui-Yun Chui (“Defendant”). Plaintiffs’ complaint asserted claims for nondischargeability under

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge In this complex securities fraud class action, Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims (Doc. 311) and Plaintiffs have filed a motion for partial summary judgment on eighteen affirmative defenses (Doc. 309). Defendants have also filed a request for judicial notice (Doc. 341) and two motions to seal (Docs. 342, 387). Each motion

MEMORANDUM CROAKE, District Judge. The three motions decided herein arise from common facts and circumstances. In March 1967 the brokerage house of Dreyfus & Co. became interested in the stock of Interamerican Industries. This interest led to a study of the stock which in turn led to representations, both written and oral, to Dreyfus customers, some of whom bought the stock. The primary written repres

35 F.Supp.2d 135 (1999) Brian A. ZUCKERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 95-CV-30044-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 9, 1999. *136 Mark I. Berson, Levy Winer Law Office, Greenfield, MA, Robert Zarco, Rosa I. Rodriguez, Zarco & Pardo, Miami, FL, for Brian A.

446 S.E.2d 838 (1994) STATE of North Carolina v. Patrick S. FIGURED. No. 9315SC539. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 16, 1994. *839 Atty. Gen. Michael F. Easley by Asst. Atty. Gen. Ellen B. Scouten, Raleigh, for the State. Appellate Defender Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr. by Asst. Appellate Defender Mark D. Montgomery,

633 F.Supp.2d 763 (2009) TEAMSTERS LOCAL 617 PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. APOLLO GROUP, INC.; John G. Sperling; Todd S. Nelson; Kenda B. Gonzales; Daniel E. Bachus; John Blair; John R. Norton III; Hedy Govenar; Brian E. Mueller; Dino J. DeConcini; Peter Sperling; and Laura Palmer Noone, Defendants. No. 2:06-CV-2674-PHX-RCB. United States

*558Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court.* The question posed is whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA or Act), 104 Stat. 327, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 12101 et seq. (1994 ed. and Supp. Ill), an employer who requires as a job qualification that an employee meet an otherwise app

Opinion of the Court EVERETT, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried at Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base, North Carolina, by a general court-martial composed of officer members. The charges were that, “on divers occasions between on or about 10 September 1985 and on or about 1 May 1987,” he had raped and committed sodomy with his daughter Jessica, in violation of Articles 120 and 125, Uniform Code of M

Charles H. Cohen, J. .This is an action on a check dated January 7, 1972 in the amount of $1,450 delivered on that date ^y defendant as maker to plaintiff as payee. This check was not paid when presented for payment. On January 13, 1972 payment was refused bgeause defendant’s account was short. When this check was redeposited payment was again refused on January 18, 1972 because payment was stopped. This check, signed by defenda

367 S.E.2d 139 (1988) 89 N.C. App. 584 STATE of North Carolina v. James William JONES. No. 8715SC674. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 19, 1988. *141 Atty. Gen. Lacy H. Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen. Debra K. Gilchrist, Raleigh, for the State. Daniel H. Monroe, Graham, for defendant-appellan

CANNELLA, District Judge. Motion by the defendants Martin Ackerman, Herman E. Cooper, Herbert Golden, Charles Zohlman, Lexington International, Inc., William Bernbach, Diversifax, Inc., Cemetery Holdings, Inc. and Allan S. Salny, to: 1) Strike, pursuant Rule 39(a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial as to the first count of the complaint and to transfer the trial