Cases

26 F.3d 1118 Hernandezv.Day NO. 93-03209 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 15, 1994 1 Appeal From: E.D.La. 2 AFFIRMED.

In re Hernandez, Austin; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 299-843;' to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 93KW-0391. Denied. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

54 S.W.3d 335 (2001) Richard HERNANDEZ, Jr., Appellant, v. SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CORP., LTD., d/b/a Hong Kong Adventist Hospital, Appellee. No. 04-00-00584-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. May 16, 2001. John D. Wennermark, Wennermark & Richter, P.L.L.C., Michael T. La Hood, *336 Law Office of Michael T. La Hood, Sa

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

10/29/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 8, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSE HERNANDEZ Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 18-01552 James M. Lammey, Judge ___________________________________

8 C.F.R. § 1003.18(b). The Supreme Court in Pereira heard and rejected the argument that this provision relaxes the time and date requirement of § 1229(a). This Court does too. This regulation is in clear contrast with the requirement of

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: “Courts have confronted, in diverse settings, the age-old problem of providing equal justice for poor and rich, weak and powerful alike.”1 In this case, we reaffirm our commitment to this principle of fairness for all as embodied in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Here, it prohibits our government from discriminating against the p

Duarte, J. *134Plaintiffs are class representatives of current and former employees of defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company who install and repair video and internet services in customers' homes. They appeal a judgment in favor of defendant following cross-motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication. Plaintiffs sought compensation

745 F.Supp.2d 15 (2010) Axel HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASHE, John Kenney, Juan Ramos, and Jerry Devine, Defendants. C.A. No. 09-cv-10259-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 13, 2010. *17 Thomas E. Day, Edward J. McDonough, Jr., Egan, Flanagan & Cohen PC, Spring-field, MA, for Defendants.

673 F.Supp.2d 673 (2009) Hector HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. Dee BATTAGLIA, et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 3590. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 14, 2009. *674 Jeremy P. Cole, Gabriel Hernandez Scannapieco, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Matthew M. Smith, Camile J. Lindsay, Illinoi

McFADDEN, Judge. An administrative law judge denied workers’ compensation claims that were based on injuries sustained by two employees who were in a motor vehicle accident while on their way to work. The appellate division of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation and the superior court both affirmed the ALJ’s decision. In Case No. A12A1292, interested party The Medical Center, Inc., which provided medical care to both em

PER CURIAM. ¶1 Nichole Day, pro se appellant, appeals a circuit court order revising a prior child placement order. Michael Hernandez, by his counsel, and the child's guardian ad litem have filed responsive briefs arguing that the circuit court's decision should be upheld. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the order of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 E.L.H. was born in 2011 and is the nonma

OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Javier Arellano Hernandez’s conviction for attempted criminal threats, pursuant to California Penal Code sections 422 and 664, constitutes an aggravated felony for which he is removable. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F), First, attempted criminal threats is categorically a crime of violence as define

A law enforcement officer who observes a traffic law violation has probable cause to detain the motorist, and the scope of that detention may be expanded where the officer has a reasonable suspicion, based on specific and articulable facts, that criminal activity is afoot. State v. McClendon, 350 N.C. 630, 636,517 S.E.2d 128, 132 (1999);

NUMBER 13-23-00527-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG RICARDO HERNANDEZ AND JOEL HERNANDEZ, Appellants, v. RENE ANGEL HERNANDEZ, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 92ND D

571 F.3d 662 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Pablo S. HERNANDEZ-ARENADO, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-2520. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 12, 2008. Decided July 6, 2009. *663 Samantha L. Chaifetz (argued), Mark B. Stern, Department of Justice, Washingto

114 S.W.3d 58 (2003) Felipe HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. Nos. 2-01-479-CR, 2-01-480-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. June 19, 2003. *60 Scott Brown, Fort Worth, for appellant. Tim Curry, District Attorney, Charles M. Mallin, Chief, Appellate Section, Edward L. Wilkinson, Camille Sparks, Lis

(2008) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. PABLO SANTIAGO HERNANDEZ-ARENADO, Register Number XXXXX-XXX, Respondent. PABLO SANTIAGO HERNANDEZ-ARENADO, Petitioner, v. IVONNE BAZERMAN, Acting Chairperson of the Federal Bureau of Prisons Certification Review Panel, Washington, D.C., and LISA J.W. HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden of U.S.P.-Marion, Marion, Illinois, Respondent. No. 08-cv-278-JPG, Consolidated with No. 08-cv-

Appellate Case: 23-5084 Document: 83-1 Date Filed: 05/02/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 2, 2025

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice Alejandro Hernandez, pro se , and the Freedom Indeed Foundation, appeal from an order denying their application for reentry. We affirm. FACTUAL SUMMARY Alejandro Hernandez, a tenant pursuant to an alleged oral lease, previously appealed from a judgment granting possession of the subject property to U.S. Bank Trust. See Hernandez v. U.S.