Cases

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13787 ANDRES HIDALGO vs. WATCH CITY CONSTRUCTION CORP. & another.1 Middlesex.

[Cite as Hidalgo v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 2013-Ohio-847.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DOLORES HIDALGO, et al. C.A. No. 12CA010191 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

1781 Riverside LLC v Hidalgo (2022 NY Slip Op 05580) 1781 Riverside LLC v Hidalgo 2022 NY Slip Op 05580 Decided on October 06, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

NUMBER 13-20-00355-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG HIDALGO COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 3, Appellant, v. HIDALGO COUNTY WATER IRRIGATION DISTRICT NO. 1, Appellee. On appeal

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI ARLEEN ALANIS CRUZ CERTIORARI HIDALGO Procedente del Tribunal de Recurrida Primera Instancia, Sala v. KLCE202401341 Superior de

NUMBER 13-24-00401-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG COUNTY OF HIDALGO, TEXAS, Appellant, v. FABIANA CARLOS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF HIDALGO COUNTY,

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI ARLEEN ALANIS CRUZ CERTIORARI HIDALGO Procedente del Tribunal de Recurrida Primera Instancia, Sala v. KLCE202401341 Superior de

NUMBER 13-24-00587-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CITY OF HIDALGO, INDIVIDUALLY AND CITY OF HIDALGO, TEXAS MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CORPORATION D/B/A PAYNE ARENA, Appellants, v. ANITA SALDANA, Appellee.

509 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2007) HIDALGO CORP., Plaintiff, v. J. KUGEL DESIGNS, INC.; Julie Sabin a/k/a Julie Kugel a/k/a Julie K. Moskowitz; and Robert Sabin a/k/a Roberto Sabatino, Defendants. J. Kugel Designs, Inc., Counter-Plaintiff, v. Hidalgo Corp., and Silvio Hidalgo, individually, Counter-Defendants. No. 05-20476-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division.

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IX NAHUM GÓMEZ APELACIÓN HIDALGO procedente del Tribunal de Primera APELANTE Instancia, Sala Superior de Carolina V. KLAN202200939

OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Carmen Hidalgo-Rosa (Hidalgo) brought this action under § 205(g) of the *242Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. Docket # 1. She then filed a memor

832 So.2d 262 (2002) S.T.R. INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. HIDALGO CORP., Appellee. No. 3D02-1834. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 11, 2002. *263 Dittmar & Hauser, and Helen Ann Hauser, Coconut Grove, for appellant. Martin A. Feigenbaum, Miami, for appellee. Before JORGENSON, FLETC

NUMBER 13-22-00510-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE COUNTY OF HIDALGO, HIDALGO COUNTY ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT, HILDA A. SALINAS, INTERIM ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR AND EVERARDO VILLARREAL, IN BOTH HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS HIDALGO COUNTY PRECINCT 3 COUNTY COMMISSIONER AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY

OPINION Opinion by Justice GARZA. This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in an employment discrimination and retaliation case. Appellant, Nicolas.Cantu, contends that the trial court erred in rendering judgment that he take nothing by way of his suit against appellee, Hidalgo County, Texas (the “County”). We affirm. I. BACKGROUND C

NUMBER 13-17-00447-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG COUNTY OF HIDALGO, Appellant, v. MARY ALICE PALACIOS Appellee. On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hi

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 11, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-217 Lower Tribunal No. 19-21746 ________________ Taylor Hodgkins Hidalgo, Appellant,

NUMBER 13-20-00113-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG HIDALGO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Appellant, v. ISIDRO VILLA HUERTA, Appellee.

NUMBER 13-21-00061-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG GABRIEL MIRANDA JR., DECEASED, MARIA FUENTES, GABRIEL MIRANDA SR., ALEXANDRA SUZANNE DELEON, REUBEN ANTONIO DELEON III, AND JON HIDALGO DOE, Appellants, v. NORMA JEAN FARLEY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01331 (CJN) ADELA PATRICIA ROSENTHAL- HILDALGO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP filed this civil action in the Superior Court of t

PER CURIAM: * Appellant Mary Alice Silva (“Silva”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the City of Hidalgo (or “City”) on her claims under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and Title VTI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.1 For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judg