Cases

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Susan Oki Mollway, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION. Before the court is Defendant Dow Agroseiences LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs. Plaintiff Nena Ansagay brought a suit individually; on behalf of the estate of her deceased husband, Benjamin O.K. Ansagay; and on behalf of their minor child, in connection wi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Builders Trust of New México’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, filed November 17, 2016 (Doc. 4)(“MTD”); and (ii) Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed December 6, 2016 (Doc. 10)(“Motion for Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on'January 23, 2017." The primary is

348 F.Supp.2d 713 (2004) ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, and Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 1:02CV32. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. December 23, 2004.

449 B.R. 42 (2011) In re Joseph W. JANSSENS, III, Debtor. Freedom Medical, Inc., Plaintiff v. Joseph W. Janssens, III, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-23222-JS. Adversary No. 08-0225-JS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland. June 15, 2010. *52 Charles Frederick Obrecht, Jr., Esquire, Obrecht and Obrecht, Severna Park, MD,

MEMORANDUM DuBOIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is an employment discrimination case. Plaintiff, Dr. Gandhi Selvanathan, alleges in the Amended Complaint that defendant Opportunities Industrialization Centers International (“OICI”), his former employer, discriminated and retaliated against him in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), Title V

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by the County of Suffolk in New York in this multi-district litigation involving allegations of fraud against various pharmaceutical companies.1 Suffolk alleges that Defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers have fraudulently inflated th

*194MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The States of Montana and Nevada allege that pharmaceutical manufacturers fraudulently overstate the published “average wholesale prices” (“AWP’s”) of many of their prescription drugs to the detriment of the States, which reimburse providers based on AWP’s, and their ci

Dolan v . SunGard 06-CV-43-JD 01/08/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Gary Dolan v. Civil N o . 06-cv-43-JD Opinion N o . 2008 DNH 003 SunGard Securities Finance, LLC and Global Compliance Services, Inc. O R D E R Gary Dolan, proceeding pro s e , brought claims against his former employer, SunGard Se

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

339 F.Supp.2d 165 (2004) In re: PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION County of Suffolk v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. No. MDL 1456. No. CIV.A.01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 30, 2004. *166 *167 *168

321 F.Supp.2d 187 (2004) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION State of Nevada v. American Home Products Corp., et al., State of Montana v. Abbott Labs, Inc., et al., MDL No. 1456. No. CIV.A.01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 10, 2004. *188

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS