Cases

677 F.Supp.2d 1221 (2009) Glenn L. BOYD, Jr., aka Glenn Leslie Boyd, Jr., Petitioner, v. Victor M. ALMAGER, Warden (A), Respondent. Case No. ED CV 07-1651-RSWL(RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 9, 2009. *1224 Glenn Boyd, Imperial, CA, pro se. Linnea Daya Piazza, Office of Attorney General, San Di

Stevenson, V. C. Without undertaking to discuss in detail all of the questions raised in this case, I shall endeavor to state the main points, the consideration of which has led me to the conclusion that the complainant’s bill should be dismissed. 1. The proof of a legal contract, as distinguished from a mere declaration of a testamentary intention, is unsatisfactory. Leaving out of view, for the present, th

A district court faced with a petition to enforce an arbitration clause engages in a limited two-part inquiry: first, it determines whether the arbitration agreement is valid, and second, it determines whether the agreement encompasses the claims at issue. Ashbey v. Archstone Prop. Mgmt., Inc. , 785 F.3d 1320, 1323 (9th Cir. 2015).

LAY, Circuit Judge. We are presented with cross appeals arising from a judgment on a counterclaim in favor of American Alloys Corporation based on alleged violations of the antitrust laws in the fraudulent procurement and enforcement of a patent pertaining to an aluminum-magnesium casting alloy, known in the trade as Almag 35. <

On Motion for Rehearing. [2] By rather a pointed motion, defendant in error asserts that we have entirely misconstrued the record, have failed to comprehend the issues, and have decided the case upon a theory foreign to that presented by the briefs of either party; that we have held that certain issues should have been submitted to the jury when plaintiffs in error asked for no such admission and have no assi