Cases

FILED Oct 11, 2023 02:04 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

556 F.3d 1310 (2009) Line ROTHMAN and Glamourmom LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARGET CORP., Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Redcats USA, L.P. (doing business as Lane Bryant Catalog), Elizabeth Lange LLC (doing business as Liz Lange Maternity), and Leading Lady, Defendants-Appellees, and Motherswear International, Defendant-Appellee, and Federated Department Stores, Macy's Department Stores, Inc., K-Mart Corp.,

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Carla Denise Garrison and Clint Garrison, Appellants/Respondents, v. Target Corporation, Respondent/Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000267 Appeal From Anderson County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5711 Heard May 15, 2019 – Filed January 15, 2020 AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED Joshua Thomas Hawkins and Helena LeeAnn Jedz

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEXANDER PANELLI, No. 24-6640 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:24-cv-01218-H- DEB v. TARGET CORPORATION, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Distr

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Carla Denise Garrison and Clint Garrison, Petitioners- Respondents, v. Target Corporation, Respondent-Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2020-000523 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Anderson County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28080 Heard May 26, 2021 – Filed January 26, 2022 AFFIRMED AS MODIFIE

*765OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #56) AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF # 58) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This action involves an insurance coverage dispute. The dispute arises out of a liability policy (the “Policy”) that. Plaintiff Northern Insurance Company of

MEMORANDUM** The district court granted summary-judgment to defendants below, on plaintiffs’ claim that inadequate warnings about odor-fade on propane gas caused injuries to the Goehring family when plaintiff Sam Goehring lit a cigarette in the Goehrings’ tent. Propane gas which no longer had a detectable odor had leaked from a heater inside the tent during the night. When Sam lit a cigarette the next morning

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2275 NICK PEARSON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TARGET CORPORATION, NBTY, INC. and REXALL SUNDOWN, INC., Defendants-Appellees, APPEAL OF: THEODORE H. FRANK,

Wood, Chief Judge. Inequitable settlements are an unfortunate recurring bug in our system of class litigation. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) is designed to minimize such problems, but appeals by class members who object to a settlement indicate that the system still needs improvement. All too often, class counsel negotiate a settlement with substantial attorneys' fees but meag

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Cycling and gravity have an uneasy relationship, as anyone who rides eventually learns. There are many ways, too many ways, to fall. A slick surface, an effort to avoid a hazard, a suddenly appearing animal, and a suddenly decelerating rider all come to mind. This lawsuit brings to the fore two other possibilities: a defective

323 F.Supp.2d 1052 (2004) Ishmael BUTLER, individually and pka Digable Planets; Maryann Vieira; and Craig Irving, Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION; Peterson Milla Hooks, Inc.; Sound 80, Ltd. aka Sound 80 A Division of Erickson Plus, Ltd.; and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 04-00269 CBM(MCx). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. Jun

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge: Appellants Thomas Fox and Robert Wasserman, as trustee for Target Industries, Inc., and Lance Plastics, Inc., and Cross-Appellants Martin Goz, Sr., et al, appeal the District Court’s affirmance of the Bankruptcy Court’s order dismissing their claims and counterclaims. For the reasons discussed below, we will affirm.1

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1256 C HRISTINE M URO , Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T ARGET C ORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 1:04-cv-0626

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Z. Lee, United States District Judge This case arises from injuries that Madison Gutterman (“Madison”) suffered while riding a skateboard within a Target store in Vernon Hills, Illinois. Hér parents, Donald and Jodi Gutterman (“Plaintiffs”), brought suit on her behalf against Target and Bravo Sports (“Bravo”), which manufactured and distributed the skateboard at issue. Tar

[Cite as Schnell v. Target Corp., 2017-Ohio-993.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Lee Schnell, et al. Court of Appeals No. E-16-039 Appellants Trial Court No. 2015-CV-0005 v. Target Corporation, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellees

*1067ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, United States District Judge Shareholders of Target Corporation stock brought suit against the company and its current and former' agents under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), codified at 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., and the Employee Retirement. Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), c

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BURROUGHS, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION On June 16, 2015, Plaintiff Kevin Grant (“Plaintiff’) filed this civil action against his former employer, Target Corporation (“Target”) in Essex County Superior Court. Plaintiff alleges that Target wrongfully terminated his employment in April 2015, and he seeks damages for breach of contra

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge | Appellant appeals from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (Commission) June 3, 2016 opinion affirming and adopting the November 4, 2015 opinion of the administrative law judge (ALJ) in which the ALJ found that appellant failed to meet her burden of proving that she is entitled to additional medical treatm

ORDER Merdelin Johnson sued the Target Corporation for negligence in this diversity action after she slipped on a spill at a Target store and allegedly sustained neck and back injuries. Her claim eventually went to trial and the jury found in Target’s favor. Johnson appeals, challenging certain evidentiary rulings as well as the *300court’s postjudgment award of costs to Target

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-982-2 Filed 3 December 2024 Mecklenburg County, No. 21-CVS-8459 MARY A. HILL, Plaintiff, v. RENEE P. EWING, CURTIS E. EWING, HERMAN T. EWING, NATHANIEL V. EWING, and MONICA Y. EWING, the heirs of Annie Marie Ewing, and CORA LEE BRANHAM, HERMAN BRANHAM, ROSLYN BRANHAM PAULING, LARUE BRANHAM, and LEROY BRANHAM, the heirs of Annie Branham, BRIGHT & NEAT I