Cases

Greene, J. This case involves a joint criminal trial of two codefendants. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City denied Respondent Tevin Hines’ motion for a severance in the trial of State v. Dorrien Allen (“Allen”) and Tevin Hines (“Hines”). Hines argues that this was error because he was prejudiced by the admission into evidence of a statement made by Allen, which was inadmissible

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Willie Junior Hines appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hines’ motion for appoin

236 P.3d 568 (2010) STATE of Kansas, Appellant, v. Matthew M. HINES, Appellee. No. 102,233. Court of Appeals of Kansas. August 6, 2010. *569 Matt J. Maloney, assistant district attorney, Nola Tedesco Foulston, district attorney, and Steve Six, attorney general, for appellant. Janine Cox, deputy appellate defender, of Kansa

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Texas requires veterinarians to conduct a physical examination of an animal or its premises before they can practice veterinary medicine with respect to that animal. In this case, we must decide whether this requirement violates the First or Fourteenth Amendment. We conclude it offends neither.

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Clifford Hunter was indicted on one count of conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846, and thirteen counts of substantive drug crimes, see id. 18 U.S.C. § 2; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(B)-(C), 843(b), 844, 846. Rather than risk a sentence of 20 years to life as second-time felony drug offender, see id. 21 U.S.C. §§ 8

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Clifford Hunter was indicted on one count of conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846, and thirteen counts of substantive drug crimes, see id. 18 U.S.C. § 2; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(B)-(C), 843(b), 844, 846. Rather than risk a sentence of 20 years to life as second-time felony drug offender, see id. 21 U.S.C. §§ 8

Blackwell, Justice. Lake Oconee Academy, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation, and pursuant to a contract with the Greene County Board of Education, the *726 Academy operates a local, public charter school in Greene County. 1 To finance the cons

559 S.E.2d 726 (2002) SMITH v. GREENE. No. S01A1657. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 4, 2002. Reconsideration Denied March 11, 2002. Harrison & Harrison, Gresham H. Harrison, Lawrenceville, for appellant. Karen G. Thomas, County Attorney, Michael V. Stephens, II, Lawrenceville, for appellee. HINES, Justice. This is an app

HUDDLESTON, Judge. Petitioners, attorney Michael Breen and the family members of three young girls allegedly slain by Michael Carneal, filed an original action, pursuant to Rules 76.36 and 81 of the Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure, asking this Court to prohibit enforcement of two orders entered by Respondent, R. Jeffrey Hines, Judge, McCracken Circuit Court, on June 24, 1998, and July 28,1998. On June 2

508 S.E.2d 310 (1998) STATE of North Carolina v. Shamar Rasheed HINES and Rodney Eugene Leak. No. COA97-1399. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 1, 1998. *311 Attorney General Michael F. Easley by Assistant Attorney General John F. Maddrey, for the State. Appellate Defender Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr. by Assistant Ap

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALVIN HINES, § § Defendant Below, § No. 203, 2022 Appellant, § § v. § § Court Below: Superior Court STATE OF DELAWARE, § of the State of Delaware §

People v Hines (2023 NY Slip Op 01323) People v Hines 2023 NY Slip Op 01323 Decided on March 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/03/2023 09:05 AM CST - 685 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 313 Nebraska Reports STATE V. HINES Cite as 313 Neb. 685 State of Nebraska, appellee

471 S.E.2d 109 (1996) 122 N.C. App. 545 STATE of North Carolina v. Edna HINES. No. COA95-733. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 4, 1996. *111 Attorney General Michael F. Easley by Associate Attorney General Sharon C. Wilson, for the State. Howard C. McGlohon, Asheville, for defendant-appellan

2021 IL App (1st) 191378 FIRST DISTRICT SIXTH DIVISION May 14, 2021 No. 1-19-1378 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of

Cite as: 592 U. S. ____ (2021) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TONY MAYS, WARDEN v. ANTHONY DARRELL DUGARD HINES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 20–507. Decided March 29, 2021 PER CURIAM. A Tennessee jury found Anthony Hines guilty of murder- ing Katherine Jenkins at a motel. Witnesses saw Hines fleeing in

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy

STEINBERG, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. KRAMER, Chief Judge, filed a dissenting opinion. STEINBERG, Judge: The appellant, through counsel, seeks review of an August 24, 2001, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that concluded that there was no clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in a June 17, 1976, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regional office (RO) decision that had denied VA

Jeff and Therese Hines ("the Hineses") appeal from a judgment of the Greene County Court of Common Pleas that granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of AmeriFirst Bank, Michael Smith, and Kline Engineering. The undisputed facts and the procedural history are as follows. In 1986, AmeriFirst owned real property located at 470 Lamplighter Place in Xenia Township. AmeriFirst sought a zoning variance for the property because it was located in the flood plain of the Oldtown Creek

Dillard, Chief Judge. *752Leon Hines appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine, fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer, and driving with a suspended license. Specifically, he argues that the trial court erred by admitting his driving record into evidence and giving an