⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Hip Girl Boutique LLC”

District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-07-17 · Published · cited 22× · 391 F. Supp. 3d 228
III. Discussion9 Plaintiffs bring false endorsement, right to privacy, deceptive acts, and defamation claims under federal and state law. A. False Endorsement under § 43(A) of the Lanham Act Section 43 of the Lanham Act prohibits the use of a protected mark in a way that is likely to cause consumer confusion "as to the origin, sponsorship, or ap
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-09-13 · Published · cited 60× · 209 F. Supp. 3d 612; 2016 WL 4784004
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge In this trademark lawsuit, two fashion companies go toe-to-toe over the right to affix a metal plate to the toe of “luxury” men’s sneakers. Plaintiff LVL XIII Brands, Inc. (“LVL XIII,” pronounced “Level 13”) is a New York start-up company that manufactures, markets, and sells men’s luxury athletic footwear. LVL XIII brings this action against defendan
District Court, C.D. California · 2011-01-05 · Published · cited 52× · 782 F. Supp. 2d 911; 2011 WL 1114250
782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille