Cases

220 Md. 685 (1959) 155 A.2d 70 HOBBS v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY [P.C. No. 30, September Term, 1959.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided October 22, 1959. Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ. *686 PER CURIAM: This is another of a long series of effort

219 Md. 684 (1959) 148 A.2d 380 HOBBS v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY [P.C. No. 5, September Term, 1958.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided February 18, 1959. Before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ. HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an application for leave to appeal under Code

194 Md. 722 (1950) 70 A.2d 814 STATE EX REL. HOBBS v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY [H.C. No. 23, October Term, 1949.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 11, 1950. Before MARBURY, C.J., DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ. PER CURIAM: The petitioner in this case had a hearing before Chief Judge Sm

540 U.S. 992 SCRIVENSv.HOBBS, WARDEN, ET AL. No. 03-6450. Supreme Court of United States. November 3, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied.

540 U.S. 902 CASANOVAv.HOBBS, WARDEN. No. 03-5335. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 Fed. A

535 U.S. 949 FOXv.HOBBS, WARDEN. No. 01-8353. Supreme Court of the United States. March 18, 2002. 1 C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F. 3d 748.

535 U.S. 1036 BROWNv.HOBBS, WARDEN. No. 01-8540. Supreme Court of the United States. April 29, 2002. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 20 Fed. Appx. 175.

SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice | Appellant, Malik Muntaqim, is an inmate in the custody of the Arkansas Department of Correction (“ADC”), Ouachita Unit. He claims that he was denied access to certain religious publications and the right to lead Nation of Islam religious services while in the custody of the ADC. Muntaqim claims these two restrictions vio

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Greg L. Hammer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42-U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights complaint in which Hammer alleged violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, see 42 U.S.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.

540 U.S. 1070 CASANOVAv.HOBBS, WARDEN, ante, p. 902; No. 03-5335. Supreme Court of United States. December 1, 2003. 1 Petition for rehearing denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and appendices filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 15, 2013 be affirmed. The court correctly held that it lacked au

Sup. Ct. Va. Cer-tiorari denied.

Petition for rehearing denied. *817Former decision, 562 U.S. 1009, 131 S. Ct. 517, 178 L. Ed. 2d 382, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8465.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from Parts II.A and II.B of the court’s opinion. The court errs in its uncritical reliance on Kelly v. Brewer, 525 F.2d 394 (8th Cir.1975), a panel decision substantially undermined, if not overruled, by later Supreme Court decisions. I would reverse the grant of nominal damages and direct entry of judgment in favor of the defendant prison offic

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.

BY THE COURT: The opinion issued on October 27, 1999 is hereby WITHDRAWN AND VACATED. A new unpublished opinion has been released through the Clerk’s office in this matter.

223 Md. 651 (1960) 163 A.2d 331 HOBBS v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY [App. No. 2, September Term, 1960 (Adv.).] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided July 5, 1960. Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ. PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The petitioner asks leave to appeal from th

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.