Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hof v. United States”
Hof v. Pride Centric Res., Inc. (In re Hof)public domain
Hon. Elizabeth W. Magner, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This matter came before the Court on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ronald Hof in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for FoodServiceWarehouse.com, L.L.C. ("FSW"). I. Facts Pride Centric Resources, Inc., f.k.a. Pride Marketing and Procurement, Inc., ("Pride") is a food service equipment collective. Members of Pride forme
Hof v. Caswell (In re Caswell)public domain
BENJAMIN A. KAHN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This adversary proceeding is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Daniel P. Caswell and Gennell D. Caswell ("Defendants") on May 29, 2018. [Doc. 13]. The Court granted the parties an additional two weeks to file any supplemental materials regarding the pending Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and then further extended the deadline
HOF Partners LLC v. Nautilus Insurance Companypublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00175-CV ___________________________ HOF PARTNERS LLC, Appellant V. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 17th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 017-333302-22 Before Birdwell, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Davispublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Admit Testimony of Philiciá Morris [43] (“Motion to Admit”). *1364I. BACKGROUND A. Facts 1. Incident and Ms. Morris’s FBI Interview O
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Abernethy v. United Statespublic domain
*185RCFC 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501; class action tolling under Bright v. United States; RCFC 56 motion for summary judgment; laches; defense prejudice. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VICTOR J. WOLSKI, Judge Before the Court is Defendan
JBF Rak LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BARZILAY, Senior Judge: Before the court is Plaintiff JBF RAK LLC’s (“JBF RAK”) motion for judgment on the agency record under USCIT Rule 56.2, challenging Defendant U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final results of the administrative review covering polyethylene terephthalate film (“PET Film”) from United Arab Emirates
United States v. Steinpublic domain
584 F.Supp.2d 660 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. No. S1 05 Crim. 0888(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 3, 2008. *661 John M. Hillebrecht, Kevin M. Downing, Margaret Garnett, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Lev Dassin, Acting U.S. Attorney. Stuart Abrams, Frankel
P.F. Stores, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION KELLY, Judge: This matter is before the court on Defendant’s, United States, and Defendant-Intervenors’, American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc., motions to dismiss. Plaintiff, P.F. Stores, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “PF Stores”), argues the court has 28 U.S.C. § 1581© (2012
JAY C. ZAINEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Ronald J. Hof, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of FoodServiceWarehouse.Com, LLC appeals the August 30, 2018 judgment of the bankruptcy court, which granted in part and denied in part his request for injunctive relief against Pride Centri
PER CURIAM. This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Hof v. Statepublic domain
97 Md. App. 242 (1993) 629 A.2d 1251 ROBERT ALAN HOF v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 952, September Term, 1992. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 1, 1993. Certiorari Granted December 10, 1993. James Wyda, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. David P.
Insurance Co. of the West v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION and ORDER BLOCK, Judge. On August 4, 2009, plaintiff, Insurance Company of the West (“ICW”) filed this action, pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act *60(“CDA”),1 in which it seeks to appeal, as equitable subrogee and assignee of the W.R. Chavez Construction Company, Inc. (“Chavez”), a contracting officer’s
Hof v. Statepublic domain
BELL, Judge. Robert Alan Hof, the petitioner, was tried by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for robbery, robbery with a dangerous and deadly weapon, assault, theft, and the unlawful use of a handgun in the commission of a felony. At the close of the evidence, the trial judge instructed the jury to consider the petitioner’s confession only if it found beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner had been given
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER . DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Relators Ricia Johnson and Health Dimensions Rehabilitation, Inc. (“HDR”) (together, “Relators”) initiated this qui tam action, on behalf of the United States of America (the “Government”), against Defendants Golden Gate National Senior Care, L.L.C.; GGNSC Holdings, L.L.C; and GGNSC Wayzata
United States v. Robert Hofschulzpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 21-3403 & 21-3404 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LISA HOFSCHULZ and ROBERT HOFSCHULZ, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court
United States v. Lisa Hofschulzpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 21-3403 & 21-3404 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LISA HOFSCHULZ and ROBERT HOFSCHULZ, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court
Hre, Incorporated v. United Statespublic domain
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. The question is whether the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”) correctly interpreted a government contract for renovation of a building as requiring the contractor to insulate certain piping. We agree with the Board’s interpretation of the contract and we affirm its decision. I.
United States v. Stonepublic domain
ATTACHMENT B Index of Social Media Posts Post # Date Post >: Brazie of) Like @ Share ey ee... tinw roi 2 Dec. 16, 2016 FBI agrees with CIA assessment that Russia wanted to help Trump win fb.me/1dfzNSSSu 3 Jan. 12, 2017 a "Mr. Comey said he couldn't discuss any investigations.” ++ £2 2 ] This post only appears m defendant’s motion, Am. Mot. at 12, not in the composite exhibit. Mar. 2, 2017 If HRC had won, and Russians had hacked the RN