⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Holbrook v. C.R.Bard, Inc.”

Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994-09-30 · Published · cited 12× · 883 P.2d 295; 249 Utah Adv. Rep. 6; 1994 Utah App. LEXIS 143; 1994 WL 556876
883 P.2d 295 (1994) Bard N. HOLBROOK, Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant, v. MASTER PROTECTION CORPORATION dba Firemaster, a California corporation; Robin D. Phillips; and John Does 1-20, Defendants, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee. No. 920216-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. September 30, 1994. *296 John T. Anderson (argued), P
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-08-26 · Published · cited 31× · 47 F.4th 451
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0203p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CONNIE J. THACKER, │ Plaintiff-App
District Court, D. Delaware · 2017-11-01 · Published · cited 5× · 297 F. Supp. 3d 501
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Before the Court are three motions to preclude expert testimony at trial, one filed by plaintiff Sonos, Inc., and two filed by defendants D & M Holdings Inc. d/b/a The D+M Group, D & M Holdings U.S. Inc., and Denon Electronics (USA), LLC (collectively, "D & M"). Sonos seeks to exclude the testimony of D & M's invalidity expert, Dr. Jay P. Kesan. Dkt. No. 292. D & M s
District Court, D. Utah · 2019-02-13 · Published · cited 56× · 369 F. Supp. 3d 1159
Jill N. Parrish, United States District Judge This ERISA case is before the court on the parties' cross-motions for summary *1166judgment. Defendant Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc. ("Anthem") moved for summary judgment on June 5, 2018 (ECF No. 38). On June 9, 2018, plaintiffs Michael D. ("Mike") and Madeline D. ("Maddie") (collectively
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-07-02 · Published · cited 2× · 721 F. Supp. 2d 62; 2010 WL 2705497
721 F.Supp.2d 62 (2010) ADVANCED ION BEAM TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. VARIAN SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Norman L. Turner, Kenneth H. Purser, and Alice W. Enge and Elizabeth Dill, as Co-Executrixes of the Estate of Harald A. Enge, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-11448-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 2, 2010.
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010-06-03 · Published · cited 7× · 726 F. Supp. 2d 604; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54660; 2010 WL 2244123
726 F.Supp.2d 604 (2010) MICROAIRE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ARTHREX, INC., Defendant. Case No. 3:09-cv-00078. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. June 3, 2010. *610 Michael Edward Whitham, Philana Shell Handler, Robert Neal Cook, Whitham, Curtis & Christofferson & Cook, P
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998-01-28 · Published · cited 10× · 12 F. Supp. 2d 69; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2263; 1998 WL 206040
12 F.Supp.2d 69 (1998) PERSEPTIVE BIOSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. PHARMACIA BIOTECH, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 93-12237-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 28, 1998. *70 Robert H. Stier, Jr., Todd S. Holbrook, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, ME, Paul S. Veidenheimer, Hutchins,
District Court, D. Delaware · 1987-09-21 · Published · cited 11× · 682 F. Supp. 227; 4 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1946; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13161; 1987 WL 43683
682 F.Supp. 227 (1987) MILLIPORE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY PATENTS, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 86-403-JRR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 21, 1987. *228 *229 Douglas E. Whitney and Mary B. Graham of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del. (Pau
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018-01-10 · Published · cited 5× · 810 S.E.2d 433; 422 S.C. 132
GEATHERS, J.: **134Robert Harrison, an employee of Owen Steel Company, appeals the decision of the Appellate Panel of the Workers' Compensation Commission (Appellate Panel) denying his claim for compensation for injuries sustained from an admitted workplace accident occurring on September 17, 2008. Harrison argues the Appellate Panel erred in f
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020-01-27 · Published · cited 10× · 948 F.3d 62
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-2127 MARCO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Leo T. Sorokin, U.S. District Judge]
Harris v. Mayorkaspublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ARLENE HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) No. 1:21-cv-01083 (GMH) ) KRISTI NOEM, et al., )
Wellin v. Wellinpublic domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016-09-30 · Published · cited 23× · 211 F. Supp. 3d 793; 2016 WL 5539523
ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The following matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation (“R <⅞ R”) by Special Master William L. Howard regarding non-party movant Dr. Ann Plum’s (“Plum”) motion for a protective order. ECF No. 370.1 For the following reasons, the court adopts as modified and rejects in part the R & R, and grants in part an
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015-08-04 · Published · cited 61× · 807 F.3d 1283; 116 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1081; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13622; 2015 WL 4639309
TARANTO, Circuit Judge. Carnegie Mellon University (“CMU”) sued Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively “Marvell”) for infringing two patents related to hard-disk drives. A jury found for CMU on infringement and validity, and it awarded roughly $1.17 billion as a reasonable royalty for the infringing acts, using a rate of 50 cents for each of
Bass v. Isochempublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005-06-06 · Published · cited 25× · 617 S.E.2d 369; 365 S.C. 454; 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 143
365 S.C. 454 (2005) 617 S.E.2d 369 Teresa A. BASS, Employee, Respondent, v. ISOCHEM and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Appellants. No. 3996. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 11, 2005. Rehearing Denied August 26, 2005. Decided June 6, 2005. *460 Stan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017-09-06 · Published · cited 84× · 870 F.3d 494; 2017 FED App. 0207P; 2017 WL 3881973; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 17174
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0207p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PETER CARL BORMUTH, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │
Altairi v. Alhajpublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999-08-30 · Published · cited 17× · 599 N.W.2d 537; 235 Mich. App. 626
599 N.W.2d 537 (1999) 235 Mich. App. 626 Abdul ALTAIRI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ahdulilah Ali ALHAJ, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 203221. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted January 6, 1999, at Detroit. Decided May 28, 1999, at 9:05 a.m. Released for Publication August 30, 1999.
Taylor v. Saxtonpublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984-02-13 · Published · cited 6× · 349 N.W.2d 165; 133 Mich. App. 302
133 Mich. App. 302 (1984) 349 N.W.2d 165 TAYLOR v. SAXTON Docket No. 67438. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided February 13, 1984. Rothe, Mazey, Mazey & Hamburger, P.C. (by Robert L. Hamburger), for plaintiff. Garan, Lucow, Miller, Seward, Cooper & Becker, P.C. (by Matthew A. Seward), for American Fed
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986-04-09 · Published · cited 3× · 389 N.W.2d 141; 150 Mich. App. 641; 1986 Mich. App. LEXIS 2565
150 Mich. App. 641 (1986) 389 N.W.2d 141 HEINS v. DETROIT OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL CORPORATION Docket No. 77176. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided April 9, 1986. James F. Finn, for plaintiff. Dice, Sweeney, Sullivan, Feikens, Hurbis & Foster, P.C. (by William C. Hurley), for Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corporatio
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2024-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 22–1317 Submitted September 11, 2024—Filed November 8, 2024 S.K., a legally incapacitated minor by and through his conservator, Thomas T. Tarbox, Appellee, vs. Obstetric & Gynecologic Associates of Iowa City and Coralville, P.C.,
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2024-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 22–1317 Submitted September 11, 2024—Filed November 8, 2024 S.K., a legally incapacitated minor by and through his conservator, Thomas T. Tarbox, Appellee, vs. Obstetric & Gynecologic Associates of Iowa City and Coralville, P.C.,