Cases

Opinion issued August 29, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00387-CV ——————————— FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellant V. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

[Cite as Allstate Vehicle & Property Ins. Co. v. Inabnitt, 2022-Ohio-2098.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY : INSURANCE COMPANY, : CASE NOS. CA2021-10-094 Appellant and Cross-Appellee,

[Cite as Allstate Vehicle & Property Ins. Co. v. Inabnitt, 2022-Ohio-2098.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY : INSURANCE COMPANY, : CASE NOS. CA2021-10-094 Appellant and Cross-Appellee,

850 S.W.2d 324 (1993) 312 Ark. 502 James M. SHEPHERD, Administrator of the Estate of Donna L. Shepherd; Jerry Kent Snow, Administrator of the Estate of Rena Kay Snow; Williams James Kennedy, Administrator of the Estate of Cheryl Lynn Holcombe; and Kelli Shawn Wheeler and Darrell Wheeler, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 92-

*688BALMER, J. This case concerns the proper application of stare decisis and requires us to decide whether Collins v. Farmers Ins. Co., 312 Or 337, 822 P2d 1146 (1991), is still good law. In Collins, this court held that an exclusion in a motor vehicle liability insurance policy that purported to eliminate all coverage for a claim by one insu

495 S.W.2d 155 (1973) James HOLCOMB and Leona Holcomb, Appellants, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellee. No. 73-20. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 21, 1973. Rehearing Denied June 25, 1973. Bon McCourtney & Associates, by Troy L. Henry, Jonesboro, for appellants. Cockrill, Laser, McGehee, Sharp & Boswell, Little Rock, for appellee.<

942 So.2d 471 (2006) Wayne COSBY, Kari Fitzgerald, John Fitzgerald, Stan McDonald, Keith Stevens, Karen Williams, Carl Williams, and Peter Oelschlaeger v. HOLCOMB TRUCKING, INC., Henry H. Holcomb, and Joyce M. Holcomb. No. 2005-C-0470. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 6, 2006. Rehearing Denied December 15, 2006. *4

Opinion ALDRICH, J. INTRODUCTION The sole issue raised by both parties to this appeal concerns the punitive damage award; specifically, whether the trial court’s remittitur of that award from $19 million to $350,000, based on a ratio of punitive to compensatory damages of 10 to one, comports with due process. Thomas Nickerson sued Ston

Justice GREEN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice MEDINA, Justice JOHNSON, Justice GUZMAN, and Justice LEHRMANN joined, and in which Justice WILLETT joined as to Parts I, II, III.AB, IV, and V. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified to this Court the following question:

Cite as 2014 Ark. 484 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-13-779 TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY Opinion Delivered November 20, 2014 COMPANY OF AMERICA; BCC CONSTRUCTION, LLC d/b/a BOYD APPEAL FROM THE CORLEY CONSTRUCTION, LLC INDEPENDENCE COUNTY APPELLANTS CIRCUIT COURT

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING ITS MOTION TO BIFURCATE S. THOMAS ANDERSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Southern Trust Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages and All Costs Claims, filed on September 26, 2016. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff Northend Investors, LLC (“Northend”) has responded in opposition

BISTLINE, Justice, dissenting. Our task in this case was not, as the majority suggests, simply to determine whether “the specific exclusion relied upon by Rocky Mountain which denies coverage in these circumstances, is void as against public policy,” but to determine whether it was void as against the legislature’s policy as stated in Idaho’s Uninsured Motorist Coverage Statute, I.C. § 41-2502. In pursuit of a s

198 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2002) WOODS MASONRY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MONUMENTAL GENERAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. C01-4045-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. April 23, 2002. *1017 *1018 *1019 *

751 P.2d 248 (1988) Frank M. BARBER, and Mario T. Barber, by and through his guardian ad litem, Ray Harding Ivie, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendant and Respondent. No. 860319-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. February 26, 1988. Sherman C. Young, Ray Phillips Ivie, Ivie and Young, Provo, for plaintiffs and appellants. Aaron Alma N

MAYNARD, Chief Justice: In this appeal from the Circuit Court of Mason County, we are asked to review an order granting summary judgment to an insurance company in a declaratory judgment action. Specifically, the circuit court found that the insurance company has no duty to its insureds in an action arising from the alleged sexual misconduct of an insured minor because coverage is precluded by the “accident” requirement and “int

558 S.W.2d 713 (1977) James Joseph OTTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. No. KCD 28240. Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District. August 8, 1977. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied August 29, 1977. Application to Transfer Denied October 11, 1977.

274 P.3d 981 (2012) 2012 UT 22 Tavis McARTHUR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20100847. Supreme Court of Utah. April 3, 2012. *982 A. Bryce Dixon, St. George, for appellant. Stuart H. Schultz, Andrew D. Wright, Andrew B. McDani

OPINION CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: The Resolution Trust Corporation and the former directors and officers of the insolvent Pacific Savings Bank appeal the district court’s summary judgment that no insurance coverage is available under policies issued by American Casualty Company and its predecessors. American Casualty appeals the district court’s order requiring it to advance defense costs incurred

OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW P. RODOVICH, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 44] filed by the plaintiffs, Annette Salomon and Edward Salomon, on January 31, 2013, the Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 47] filed by the defendant, Cincinnati Insurance Company, on January 31, 2013, and the Motion to Strike [DE 50] filed by the plaintiffs on Februa

*1335Petitions for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel's