Cases

749 F.Supp.2d 644 (2010) Glynn A. HOLDER, Petitioner, v. Warden M. CURLEY, Respondent. Case No. 2:10-CV-13841. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 28, 2010. Glynn Holder, Muskegon, MI, pro se. ORDER OF TRANSFER PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge. On September 27, 2010, Petitioner filed a habeas

SECTION A REASONS FOR DECISION Hon. Elizabeth W. Magner, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge The Motion for Relief from Stay filed by AP Direct L.L.C. (“AP”) and the Objection filed by debtors, James and Wanda Curley (collectively “Debtors”) came before the Court on May 9, 2017. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the matter under advisement. I. Findings of Fact

121 P.3d 106 (2005) CURLEY ELECTRIC, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, v. Joseph BILLS and Jane Doe Bills husband and wife, individually and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents, C K International Corporation, a Washington corporation; and the Pike Street Corporation, a Washington corporation, Defendants/Cross-Defendants. Pike Street Corporation, Third Party Plaintiff, v. Clubland, Inc., a Washington corpor

*116¶1 Grosse, J. — With respect to real estate, under the Washington Revised Uniform Partnership Act, chapter 25.05 RCW (RUPA) the question of whether the owners intend to form a partnership is one of fact. The burden of proving the existence of a partnership rests on the party alleging it, and its existence depends on the intention of the parties and the

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, who des

7 F.Supp.2d 359 (1998) James F. CURLEY, Plaintiff, v. ST. JOHN'S UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. 97 Civ. 4450(CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 3, 1998. *360 Lee W. Nuwesra, New York City, for Plaintiff. Ruth D. Raisfield, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, L.L.P., New York City, for Defendant.

54 Wn. App. 548 (1989) 774 P.2d 542 ALFRED LEE FINLEY, Appellant, v. JAMES R. CURLEY, ET AL, Respondents. No. 8977-1-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. June 20, 1989. Thomas Cochran and Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, for appellant. Dennis Hession, for respondents. SHIELDS,

*250Murphy, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. McWilliams, Singley and Digges, JJ., dissent and Singley, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which McWilliams and Digges, JJ., concur at page 267 infra. On Sunday, December 3,1967, Alonzo Stevenson, while on personal business, drove a van leased

16 Md. App. 453 (1973) 298 A.2d 190 GENERAL VALET SERVICE, INC. v. THOMAS EDWARD CURLEY ET AL. No. 112, September Term, 1972. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 3, 1973. The cause was argued before MOYLAN, POWERS and GILBERT, JJ. Aubrey M. Daniel, III, and William E. McDaniel, with whom were Williams

Kass, J. There was, on the face of it, some confusion in the special verdict which the jury returned.1 In response to the first two questions of the special verdict; the jury had found that Gilbane’s negligence was the proximate cause of injuries which the plaintiff had suffered on March 15, 1978, when he fell while working at a construction site. The jury, in answer to the third question, assessed t

On the two appeals, from the same decree, the question argued is whether mortgage participation certificates purchased by a decedent in her lifetime and issued to herself as life tenant with power to sell, mortgage, lease, or consume, and with remainders over, belong after her death to her estate, to be administered by her executor, or belong to the remaindermen by virtue of a completed gift of the remainders. The executor filed a bill praying that the court, as a court of equity, assume juri

Ryan, District Judge. This is an action brought by the plaintiff to foreclose a certain real estate mortgage upon a tract of farm land located in Dawson county, Nebraska. The petition is in the usual form. A cross-petition was filed by the defend*830ant Lexington State Bank, asking foreclosure of a lien in the sum of $1,530.40 upon a partial assignment of the mortgage

This is an appeal from a decree rendered in favor of plaintiffs, quieting title to two hundred acres of land in Tehama County. The question involved in this action is whether the beneficiary under a trust deed is a necessary party to an action to set aside the deed on the ground that it was procured by fraud, or whether, on the contrary, the trustee as a party defendant represents the beneficiary so as to bind him by a decree declaring the deed void. The plaintiff Johnson is the

Rugg, C.J. This is a petition for instructions as to the proper custody, management and control of two funds held for public charitable purposes, one known as the Franklin fund and the other as the Carnegie donation. The plaintiffs are the city of Boston and the city treasurer of Boston. The defendants are The Franklin Foundation, a corporation created by St. 1908, c. 569, the individuals constituting the

Mr. Justice McSurely delivered the opinion of the court. This decree must be reversed for the following reasons: There are no allegations in the bill which can support any decree against John Kause; there are no allegations that he had any beneficial interest in the fund procured by the loan from Curley, or that he ever authorized any advances to be made for him, o

Mr. Justice McSurely delivered the opinion of the court. This decree must he reversed for the same reasons that are given in a similar suit between the same parties, No. 15672, decided at the same time with this. There is only one difference in this case requiring any comment in addition to what we said in our opinion in the other case. In the case at bar some attempt is made

609 F.2d 1294 61 A.L.R.Fed. 346, 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 477 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Arden Lee SMITH aka Alfredo Lama, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Leroy JONES, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John Doe CURLEY, aka Ernest Crayton, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. C.A. 78-1532, C

The opinion of the court was delivered by Veazey, J. This was an appeal from an order of the Probate Court disallowing a claim presented by the plaintiff against the defendant estate. The claim was based on a promissory note which James Hand executed to the plaintiff. The latter indorsed it during the life of Hand, waiving demand and notice, to Hiram Bellows, for valuable consideration. Hand died, and commissio

Davis, P. J.: The fifty barrels of whiskey, for which the receipt, upon which this action is based, was given, were manufactured by the respondent in March, 1875. Between March 9 and 13, they were removed into the distillery bonded warehouse of the respondent,, in the seventh district of Kentucky, and on or about April 1, following, they were entered for deposit in said distillery warehouse, in the manner and form required by

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 189 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 190 The differing views of the judges of the learned court whose decision is before us, as to the proper construction and effect o