Cases

[Cite as Bank of New York Mellon v. Ettayem, 2014-Ohio-4487.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON JUDGES: fka THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. TRUSTEE Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J.

637 F.Supp. 742 (1986) FLEET AEROSPACE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Mark HOLDERMAN, Acting Commissioner and Chief of Securities for Division of Commerce; Kenneth Cox, Director of Commerce, Department of Commerce; Aeronca, Inc.; and The State of Ohio, Defendants. No. C-2-86-0556. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. June 11, 1986.

848 F.2d 720 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,753, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,795FLEET AEROSPACE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mark HOLDERMAN, Acting Commissioner and Chief of SecuritiesDiv. of Securities, Department of Commerce of the State ofOhio (86-3536); Kenneth Cox (86-3536); Aeronca, Inc.; andthe State of Ohio (86-3533), Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 86-3533, 86-3536. United

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

391 F.Supp.2d 660 (2005) Oscar WALDEN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. No. 04 C 0047. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 25, 2005. *661 *662 *663 John Ladell Stainthorp, G. Flint Taylor, Jr., Amber M

KUSKIN, J.T.C. Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Tax Court seeking review of a judgment of the Passaic County Board of Taxation which affirmed the 1999 tax assessment on his property. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that, under the definition of tax delinquency in N.J.S.A. 54:4-67, plaintiff failed to comply with the tax payment requirements contained in N.J.S.A. 54:51A-lb. This lat

24 N.J. 295 (1957) 131 A.2d 773 NEW JERSEY RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued April 1 and April 8, 1957. Decided May 13, 1957. *297 Mr

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 00-3536 LISA PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 99 C 7864--James F. Holderman, Judge. ARGUED APRIL 12, 2001--DECIDED MAY 24, 2001 Before EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Lisa Price brought disparate impact discrimination and equal protecti

Holderman, J. On February 18, 1966, Pacific Insurance Company of New York, as subrogee of CPC, Inc., and CPC, Inc., filed their verified complaint in this Court seeking a recovery in the amount of $5,799.53. The record consists of the following: 1. Complaint 2. Transcript of evidence t

42 N.J. Super. 84 (1956) 125 A.2d 908 HOTEL SUBURBAN SYSTEM, INC., ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT, AND N.J. STATE CULINARY ALLIANCE, ET ALS., INTERVENING DEFENDANTS. ATLANTIC CITY HOTEL ASSOCIATION, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT, AND N.J. STATE CULINARY

46 N.J. Super. 46 (1957) 133 A.2d 705 J. ABBOTT & SON, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET ALS., PETITIONERS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 18, 1957. Decided July 12, 1957.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HOLDERMAN, District Judge: After appropriate hearings, briefing and review, Magistrate Judge Rebecca R. Pall-meyer on September 2, 1994 issued a thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) as to certain motions pending in this case which this court referred for that purpose. That Report and Recommendation stated in full is as

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, J.A.D. These consolidated appeals involve challenges by the planning boards of the Townships of Egg Harbor (Egg Harbor) and Hamilton (Hamilton) to the action of the New Jersey Pinelands Commission (Commission) denying them standing and an opportunity to be heard or to object to development approvals granted by the Commission’s staff in their respective comm

75 N.J. 544 (1978) 384 A.2d 795 NEW JERSEY GUILD OF HEARING AID DISPENSERS, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; JOSEPH IACONO AND ROBERT P. AHRENS, APPELLANTS, v. VIRGINIA LONG, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS; THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THE HEARING AID DISPENSERS EXAMINING COMMITTEE AND THE STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, AGENCIES OF THE STATE OF

958 A.2d 42 (2008) 403 N.J. Super. 146 MOUNTAIN HILL, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant (Two Cases). Nos. A-5496-04T3, A-5871-04T3. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 22, 2008. Decided September 10,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 12-2619 JERRY G. MARKADONATOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF WOODRIDGE, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 12‐2619 JERRY G. MARKADONATOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF WOODRIDGE, Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________

Howk, C. J. In this action, the appellees sued the appellant, as a common carrier of goods for hire, in the Allen Circuit Court, in' a complaint of two paragraphs. On the appellees’ application, the venue of the action was changed to the court below. In this latter court the appellees hied an amended second paragraph, and an additional third paragraph of their complaint. The appellant demurred to each paragraph of the appellees’ com

[Cite as Keller & Kehoe, L.L.P. v. Smart Media of Delaware, Inc., 2016-Ohio-5409.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103607 KELLER & KEHOE, L.L.P. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

57 N.J. Super. 13 (1959) 153 A.2d 757 THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND ANDREW G. SAPIENZA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND ISABELL CHURLIN SPENCE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 2, 1959. Decided July