⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Hollister Construction Services, LLC”

Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012-02-15 · Published · cited 9× · 359 S.W.3d 146; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 184; 2012 WL 503600
359 S.W.3d 146 (2012) ALTOM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, GREAT River Engineering of Springfield, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BB SYNDICATION SERVICES, INC., Michele McCue Trustee, Defendants-Appellants, Hollister Interchange Development Company, LLC, Explosive Contractors, Inc., Gage Excavating, LLC, Justin Gage, Defendants-Respondents. No. SD 30966. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District,
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2024-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Konecranes Nuclear Equipment & ) ASBCA Nos. 62797, 62827 Services, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. N62470-16-D-2013 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Suzanne Sumner, Esq.
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 83 Mass. App. Ct. 513; 986 N.E.2d 417; 2013 WL 1668976; 2013 Mass. App. LEXIS 59
Sullivan, J. The Architectural Access Board (board) issued a final order on May 26, 2010, requiring that the retailer J.M. Hollister, LLC (Hollister), make all entrances to its Kingston, *514Massachusetts, store accessible to persons with disabilities.1 Hollister sought review in the Superior Court pursuant to G. L. c. 30A, and a judge granted
California Court of Appeal · 2017-01-31 · Published · cited 69× · 7 Cal. App. 5th 1318; 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 395; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 66
Opinion O’ROURKE, J. In this case, plaintiff OC Interior Services, LLC (OCI), purchased real property knowing about a recorded default judgment in the chain of title that vacated the lien interest of the predecessor in interest to appellants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, in trust for the Harborview Mortgage Loan pass-through certificates, se
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-873C (Filed Under Seal: May 5, 2023) (Reissued: May 16, 2023) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** KONECRANES NUCLEAR * EQUIPMENT & SERVICES, LLC, * * Plaintiff, *
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2025-01-15 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) AECOM Technical Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62800 ) Under Contract No. W912DY-15-R-ESP7 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: William D. Edwards, Esq. Taft Stettinius & Hollister
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016-08-02 · Published · cited 2× · 198 F. Supp. 3d 568; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102248; 2016 WL 4134643
OPINION AND ORDER Mark S. Davis, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CertusView Technologies, LLC (“Cer-tusView” or “Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant”) filed this patent infringement action alleging that S&N Locating Services, LLC and S&N Communications, Inc.’s (“S&N” or “Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs”) infringed the five Patents-in-Suit. S&N responded by filing an amended answer asserting an inequita
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010-12-28 · Published · cited 4× · 10 A.3d 92; 125 Conn. App. 665; 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 577
10 A.3d 92 (2010) 125 Conn.App. 665 DAUTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF NEWTOWN. No. 31495. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 1, 2010. Decided December 28, 2010. *94 Robert A. Fuller, Wilton, for the appellant (defendant). Timothy
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2019-04-16 · Published · cited 16× · 574 S.W.3d 610
Affirmed in part, Reversed and Rendered in part, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 16, 2019. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00480-CV DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., Appellant v. DCT HOLLISTER RD, LLC; STAPLES, INC.; NORTHWEST CROSSING ASSOCIATION, INC.; FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL HOUSTON, INC.; KEITH GROTHAUS; VICTORIA BROWN; AND JARED HO
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010-12-28 · Published · cited 4× · 10 A.3d 84; 125 Conn. App. 652; 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 584
10 A.3d 84 (2010) 125 Conn.App. 652 DAUTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY OF the TOWN OF NEWTOWN. No. 31496. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 1, 2010. Decided December 28, 2010. *86 David L. Grogins, Danbury, with whom was Barbara M. Schellenberg, Bridgeport,
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2023-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Gilbert Solutions, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63508 ) Under Contract No. W91WRZ-22-P-0001 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Barbara A. Duncombe, Esq. Brandon E. Dobyns, Esq.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-102C Filed: March 28, 2025 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TPMC-ENERGY SOLUTIONS * ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2008, * LLC, * Plaintiff, * * v. *
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017-07-28 · Published · cited 10× · 2017 IL App (2d) 160359
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity
California Court of Appeal · 2012-09-19 · Published · cited 3× · 209 Cal. App. 4th 473; 147 Cal. Rptr. 3d 203; 2012 WL 4099099; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 990
*478Opinion ELIA, J. This case involves two consolidated actions in eminent domain brought by the Council of San Benito County Governments (COG), a joint powers authority created under a joint powers agreement between the County of San Benito, the City of Hollister, and the City of San Juan Bautista, to acquire property for the Highway 25 bypass project.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2024-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below is subject to an ASBCA Protective Order. This version has been approved for public release. ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) BAE Systems Technology Solutions & ) ASBCA Nos. 63218, 63219 Services Inc. )
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018-05-04 · Published · cited 40× · 889 F.3d 1291
Stoll, Circuit Judge. Appellants Heat On-The-Fly, LLC and Super Heaters North Dakota, LLC (together, "HOTF") 1 appeal the district court's judgment of inequitable conduct, summary judgment of obviousness, denial of judgment as a matter of law of no tortious interference, construction of disputed claim terms, and dismissal of
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-30 · Published · cited 26× · 175 F. Supp. 3d 191; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42272; 2016 WL 1276448
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Dedra De La Rosa alleges that Defendants 600 Broadway Partners, LLC, (“600 Broadway Partners”) and J.M. Hol-lister (“Hollister”) discriminated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the New York State Executive Law, the New York State Civil Rights Law (“NYSCRL”
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 122 N.E.3d 901
Baker, Judge. *903 [1] Indianapolis Airport Authority (the Authority) and Indiana Hotel Equities, LLC (the Hotel), had a lease agreement (the Lease) for property on which the Hotel operated a hotel. The parties sued each other, each alleging that the other had breached the Lease and each fil
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1350 Doc: 51 Filed: 07/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 19 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1350 EMPLOYERS’ INNOVATIVE NETWORK, LLC; JEFF MULLINS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BRIDGEPORT BENEFITS, INC., a foreign corporati
Michigan Supreme Court · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 498 Mich. 929; 871 N.W.2d 205
Zahra, J. (dissenting). After a breakdown in the relationship between the franchisee-plaintiffs (David Abbo and related persons) and the franchisor-defendants (Wireless Toyz Franchise, LLC, and related persons), plaintiffs filed suit against defendants, alleging that defendants *930had failed to disclose certain costs and expenses of operating a franchise. Specifically, t