Cases

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. Clinard Oil Company, Inc. ("Clinard") appeals the 12 July 2016 order by Judge Kevin M. Bridges in Davidson County Superior Court denying its motion for summary judgment. Clinard contends the instant case brought by the individual Du Phan, d/b/a Good Food Market ("Du Phan") is barred by res judicata due to the dismissal with prejudice of an earlier suit brought by the corporate entity Good Food Market,

Opinion issued August 26, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00613-CV ——————————— MINH TRAN, Appellant V. HONG KONG DEVELOPMENT CORP. A/K/A HONG KONG CITY MALL,

500 F.3d 895 (2007) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan V. PHAN, Defendant-Appellant, and The Hartcourt Companies Inc.; Yongzhi Yang, Defendants. No. 05-55269. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 14, 2007. Filed August 29, 2007. *896

BERZON, Circuit Judge: The SEC alleged that Alan Phan used stock registered only for employee compensation purposes to raise capital from the public for the cash-strapped publicly traded company he led in 1999, thereby violating federal securities law. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the SEC, holding that Phan both engaged in an unregistered securities sa

OPINION LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice. Appellant, Hung Tan Phan, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for lack of standing on his claims against appellees, An Dinh Le, Tan Minh Cao, and Huy Dinh Troung and its award of damages against Phan on Cao’s and Truong’s counterclaims. In two issues, Phan argues (1) Phan had standing to bring his claims

105 F.Supp.2d 83 (2000) WENDY HONG WU a/k/a Hong Wu and Arthur Lin, Plaintiffs, v. DUNKIN' DONUTS, INC., Turnway Donuts, Inc., Rick Yuan, Jessie Pan, and York Kissena Realty, Inc., Defendants. No. 98-CV-3020 ARR. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 14, 2000. *84 Madeline Lee Bryer, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiffs

Opinion issued April 30, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas <

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 22, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00386-CV UNIFUND CCR, LLC, Appellant V. GALEN B. RICE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ROSA MARIA HANASH, § No. 08-16-00054-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION SIMPSON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on appeal from the November 13, 2001 order of the United States Bankruptcy Court overruling the Chapter 7 Trustee’s objection to the exemptions claimed by the debtors in their 1995 Taurus automobile. *888The debtors, Long T. Tran and Khanh Thi

517 F.3d 104 (2008) VIETNAM ASSOCIATION FOR VICTIMS OF AGENT ORANGE, Phan Thi Phi Phi, Nguyen Van Quy, Individually and as parent and natural guardian of Nguyen Quang Trung, Thuy Nguyen Thi Nga, His children, Duong Quynh Hoa, Individually and as administratrix of the estate of her deceased child, Huynh Trung Son, On behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Nguyen Thang Loi, Tong Thi Tu, Nguyen Long Van, Nguyen Thi Thoi, Nguyen Minh Chau, Nguye

JUSTICE HASSELL delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal, Far East Bank and its purported shareholders seek to recover a portion of a fund deposited with the general receiver of the circuit court. The dispositive issue we consider is whether the appellants have established that they are shareholders of

AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER and JUDGMENT WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. [[Image here]] *14[[Image here]] *15[[Image here]] I.Introduction This case involves claims by Vietnamese nationals and an organization, The Vietnamese

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE No. 17-56522 COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-09420- v. CBM-SS HUI FENG; LAW OFFICES OF FENG AND ASSOCIATES PC, OPINION Defendants-Appellants.

441 Mich. 23 (1992) 490 N.W.2d 568 BOWIE v. ARDER DUONG v. HONG Docket Nos. 92477, 92629, (Calendar Nos. 4-5). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued April 7, 1992. Decided September 22, 1992. Earl R. Spuhler for the plaintiff in Bowie. Joseph S. Smigiel, Jr. for the plaintiffs in Duong.<

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is a motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Qualcomm Incorporated ("Qualcomm") against Defendants Compal Electronics, Inc. ("Compal"), FIH Mobile Ltd. and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (together "Foxconn"), Pegatron Corporation ("Pegatron"), and Wistron Corporation ("Wistron"), collectively "Defendants" or "Contract Manufacturers." Dkt. No. 35-1.

401 F.Supp.2d 123 (2005) Wen Ho LEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-3380(RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 16, 2005. *124 *125 Allyson Newton Ho, Washington, DC, Brian A. Sun, Jones Day, Los Angeles, CA, Charles

Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases present the question whether a panel of the Court of Appeals consisting of two Article III judges and one Article IV judge had the authority to decide petitioners’ appeals. We conclude it did not, and we therefore vacate the judgments of the Court of Appeals. Petitioners are residents of the island of Guam, which has been a pos

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Van Due Vo, a naturalized U.S. citizen fighting extradition to Thailand, appeals an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Vo asserts that the crime with which he was charged was *1237 a political

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VAN DUC VO, a/k/a Vo Van Duc,  Nguyen Tran Van and Trang Van No. 04-56689 Nguyen, Petitioner-Appellant,  D.C. No. CV-04-05543-DDP v. OPINION MICHAEL L. BENOV, Warden, Respondent-Appellee