Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hooker v. Commissioner of Social Security”
735 F.Supp.2d 978 (2010) Dominic SABBIA, Sr., Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. No. 09 C 3768. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 25, 2010. *979 Dominic Sabbia, Sr., Chicago, IL, pro se. *980 Ann L. W
Hooker v. Illinois State Board of Electionspublic domain
Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of thi
171 F.3d 1052 23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1096 DIXIE FUEL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; Darrell Blevins, SocialSecurity Freedom of Information Act Officer;Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner,Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-6099. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Sept. 22, 1998.
Dixie Fuel Co. v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Dixie Fuel Company (“Dixie Fuel”) appeals from the order of the district court denying its motion for a temporary restraining order, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to prevent the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) from assigning beneficiaries under the Coal Industry Retirement Health Benefit Act (“Coal Act”), 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 9701-9722 (West Supp.1998), to Dixie Fuel.
Coe v. Hookerpublic domain
406 F.Supp. 1072 (1976) Carol COE et al. v. Thomas HOOKER et al. Rebecca ROE et al. v. Thomas HOOKER et al. Wanda WOE et al. v. Thomas HOOKER et al. Civ. A. Nos. 75-206, 75-244 and 75-253. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. January 8, 1976. *1073 *1074
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.public domain
CURTIN, Chief Judge. In a ruling dated April 30, 1988, Special Master John E. Sexton held that a “mental processes” privilege is applicable in this case with respect to deposition testimony as to the unwritten, uncommunicated mental activities of certain administrative decisionmakers. The Master went on to hold, however, that in a context such as the instant one where judicial review of an administrative decision is not at issue
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.public domain
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER NO. 6 CURTIN, Chief Judge. Occidental Chemical Corporation [OCC] now brings a motion to compel the State of New York [the State] to produce all health data relating to Love Canal residents and others sought by OCC’s document requests and interrogatories to the State. The State opposes this motion and relies primarily upon section 206(l)(j) of the New York Public Health Law, as well as the
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.public domain
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The appellants are four environmental organizations. Two, the Ecumenical Task Force (“ETF”) and Niagara Environmental Action (“NEA”) are New York organizations; many members of ETF and all members of NEA are directly affected by .industrial pollution of the Niagara River.) The two others, Pollution Probe Foundation (“PPF”) and Operation Clean Niagara (“OCN”) are Canadian organizations; many members
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.public domain
749 F.2d 968 21 ERC 1961, 53 USLW 2285, 40Fed.R.Serv.2d 269,14 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,875 UNITED STATES of America, the State of New York, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.HOOKER CHEMICALS & PLASTICS CORP., Hooker Chemical Corp.,Occidental Petroleum Investment Co., OccidentalPetroleum Corp. & City of Niagara Falls,N.Y. ("S"-Area Landfill), Defendants,Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp., City o
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Hooker v. Contepublic domain
Eager, J. This is an article 78 proceeding seeking an order directing the issuance of a permit to the petitioner for the use of a firehouse auditorium for the purpose of holding a public meeting. The auditorium sought to be used is a part of the Weaver Street Fire House which' is situated within Fire District No. 1 of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County, New York. Said fire district was established by special act of the L
USCA11 Case: 22-12041 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 07/31/2025 Page: 1 of 108 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12041 ____________________ BRANDON FUL
Melendez v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
20-4238 Melendez v. City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-4238-cv MARCIA MELENDEZ, JARICAN REALTY INC., 1025 PACIFIC LLC, LING YANG, TOP EAST REALTY LLC, HAIGHT TRADE LLC, ELIAS BOCHNER, 287 7TH AVENUE REALTY LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
494 F.2d 743 Linda ALCALA, Individually and on behalf of all otherpersons similarly situated, Appellee,v.Kevin J. BURNS, Individually and in his capacity as ActingCommissioner of theState of Iowa Department of SocialServices; and Michael Ryan, Individually andin his capacityas Director of the Scott County Department of SocialServices,Appellants.Jane DOE and Joan Roe, Appellees,v.Kevin J. BURNS, Individually a
ACCEPTED 14-15-00178-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/23/2015 5:35:28 PM
Ronald Goldman & 27 Other Taxpayers v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
SUPERIOR COURT RONALD GOLDMAN & 27 OTHER TAXPAYERS v. SECRETARY OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Docket: 2084CV01604 Dates: March 10, 2021
ACCEPTED 14-15-00178-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/21/2015 11:31:57 AM
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
State of Tennessee v. Barbara Mae Potterpublic domain
02/05/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 26, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BARBARA MAE POTTER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Washington County No. 39553A Jon Kerry Blackwood, Senior Judge ___________________________________
Willie Nelson Music Co. v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION Cantrel, Special Trial Judge: These cases are before the Court on petitioners’ motions to seal filed in each case on May 16,1985.1 They were called for hearing at Washington, D.C. on June 5, 1985, at which time counsel for the parties appeared and presented argument. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the motio