Cases

809 F.Supp.2d 263 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. David ROSEN, Defendant. No. 11 Cr. 300(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 12, 2011. *264 Glen Garrett McGorty, Michael Scott Bosworth, William Joseph Harrington, United States Attorney Office, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Edward Scott Morvillo,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 21-2846 __________ WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR.; JOSHUA HUZZARD; DAMPSEY STUCKEY v. TOM STAFF, Individually; LOUIS DENAPLES, individually; DOMINICK DENAPLES; LACKAWANNA RECYCLING CENTER INC; COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA; LACKAWANNA

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Appellants Robert F. Rood, IV, and Charles Timothy Jewell appeal from a November 4, 2011, judgment against them in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding in accordance with a memorandum of decision issued September 26, 2011.1 The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being de

ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1677 SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON; JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON; SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., Individually; PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Individually; UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE DEPARTME

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1677 SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON; JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON; SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., Individually; PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Individually; UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, In their individual capacities;

ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1677 SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON; JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON; SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., Individually; PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Individually; UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE DEPARTME

OPINION WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: Teofilo Medina, Jr., a California death row inmate, appeals the district court’s denial of his petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. Medina killed four people in a month-long crime spree in 1984. For these murders, the California courts imposed two death sentences: one in Orange County, the subject of the habeas petition

KAREN MOULTON, * NO. 2020-CA-0090 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS * SIMILARLY SITUATED COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STEWART ENTERPRISES, STATE OF LOUISIANA INC., JOHN B. ELSTROTT, JR., * * * * * * * THOMAS M. KITCHEN, ALDEN J. MCDONALD, JR., RONAL

KAREN MOULTON, * NO. 2020-CA-0090 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS * SIMILARLY SITUATED COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STEWART ENTERPRISES, STATE OF LOUISIANA INC., JOHN B. ELSTROTT, JR., * * * * * * * THOMAS M. KITCHEN, ALDEN J. MCDONALD, JR., RONAL

SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judge. Debtor George David Gordon, Jr. (“Gordon”) was formerly a practicing securities attorney and a certified public accountant, who regularly engaged in securities investing on behalf of himself, his wife, and his clients. He conducted business through his solely-owned professional corporation, G. David Gordon & Associates, P.C. (the “Professional Corpora

273 F.Supp.2d 817 (2001) HEALTHPOINT, LTD., Plaintiff, v. ETHEX CORPORATION, Defendant. Ethex Corporation, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Healthpoint, Ltd., DPT Laboratories, Ltd. and DFB Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (f/k/a DFB Holding, Inc.), Counterclaim Defendants. Dpt Laboratories, Ltd. and Dfb Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Ethex Corporation and KV Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Counterclaim Defendants.

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This case involves a dispute arising from an alleged contract between plaintiff and the Smithsonian Institution to distribute videotaped Smithsonian programs. It is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment and on plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. Oral argument was held on October 2, 1997. The court took additional evidence in a hearing

810 A.2d 351 (2002) In re NANTUCKET ISLAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITHOLDERS LITIGATION. No. 17379. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: September 26, 2002. Decided: October 8, 2002. *354 Norman M. Monhait, Esquire, Rosenthal Monhait Gross & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Pamela

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Appellant brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) (1982), seeking release of Federal Bureau of Investigation files relating to Louis Adamic. The District Court granted summary judgment to the government. Appellant challenges the FBI’s reliance on exemptions for “personal privacy” and “confidential source

213 B.R. 67 (1997) In re MAIN, INC., Debtor. In re Eric J. BLATSTEIN, Debtor. 718 ARCH STREET ASSOCIATES, LTD. and Mitchell W. Miller, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. Eric J. BLATSTEIN, Debtor, Main, Inc., Debtor, Lori J. Blatstein, Delawareco, Inc. t/a Maui, Engine 46 Steak House, Inc.; Reedco, Inc. t/a Margarita Cafe, Waterfront Management Corporation Columbusco, Inc., Airbev, Inc., and Pier 53 North, Inc., Defendants. 718 ARCH STREET ASSOC

471 F.Supp. 1132 (1979) Henry E. BARTELS, Theodore Rosen, and Ugo Quazzo v. ALGONQUIN PROPERTIES, LTD., a Vermont Corporation, Trask and Waite Realtors, Inc., a Vermont Corporation, Robert N. Waite, W. Whitbread Gilligan, George E. Trask and Guy A. Thomas, III, Individually and in their capacities as officers, directors and/or shareholders. Civ. A. No. 76-144. United States District Court, D. Vermont.<

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

COOK, Chief District Judge, delivered the opinion of the court, in which JONES, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 515-16), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., Chief District Judge. The parties to this action appeal several orders by the district court. The issues on appeal and cross-appeal are whether the district court erred when it (1) concluded

ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P