Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Horsman v. Doe”
People v. Horsmanpublic domain
JUSTICE ZENOFF delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justices Bowman and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION On May 26, 2009, the trial court sentenced defendant, Brian Horsman, to 30 months’ conditional discharge a
Supreme Court No. 2025-247-Appeal. (KC 24-294) Shilo D. Horsman, individually, and in : her capacity of as administratrix of the Estate of Eric Horsman and as parent and guardian of Jack Horsman, Matthew Horsman, and Mason Horsman v. : Travelers Property Casualty Company : o
Commonwealth v. Horsmanpublic domain
Laurence, J. On the afternoon of October 24, 1994, Norman Jackson, who was visually impaired, was attacked from behind while walking home from the Andover train station by a man who ordered him to surrender his briefcase. Jackson resisted, and a tussle ensued. Jackson managed to hold onto his briefcase, but his assailant hit him repeatedly on the head, causing bleed*263in
Van Egmond v. Horsmanpublic domain
Opinion by Judge KAPELKE. In this action to foreclose on a deed of trust on real property and a security interest in personal property under a security agreement executed by defendants, Clair Elwin and Marie Horsman, plaintiffs, Ronald T. and Brenda C. Van Egmond, appeal from the order entered by the trial court determining that a sheriff's sale had covered only the real property and did not include the personal property. We a
Horsman v. Wahlpublic domain
551 N.W.2d 619 (1996) Jolene HORSMAN, Appellant, v. Darwin WAHL, Appellee. No. 95-541. Supreme Court of Iowa. July 24, 1996. Robert K. DuPuy of LaMarca & Landry, P.C., West Des Moines, for appellant. Phillip H. Dorff, Jr., of Hopkins & Huebner, P.C., Des Moines, for appellee. Considered by McGIVERIN, C.J., and LARSON, CARTER, SNELL, and ANDREAS
United States v. Donovan Horsmanpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 96-3013 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v.
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL., ) ANDREW BAILEY, ) ) Relator, ) WD87305 ) V. ) OPINION FILED: ) OCTOBER 22, 202
Horsman v. Statepublic domain
82 Md. App. 99 (1990) 570 A.2d 354 RAYMOND LESTER HORSMAN, III v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 925 September Term, 1989. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 2, 1990. M. Albert Figinski and Stuart R. Berger, Baltimore, for appellant. Richard B. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baltimore, and
United States v. Donovan Walter Horsmanpublic domain
MAGILL, Circuit Judge. Donovan Walter Horsman was convicted in the district court 2 of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1994), and was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum of 180 months imprisonment. On appeal, Horsman argues that: (1) section 922(g) is unconstitution
Moritz v. Horsmanpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 629 In Moritz v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 291 Mich. 190, we affirmed the order of the circuit court denying delayed appeal from an order of the probate court allowing the final account of Thomas R. Horsman, general administrator of the estate of John Horsman, deceased.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Colie, J. A. D. This matter is before the court as an appeal under Buie 3 :81-8 from final decisions of the Unemployment Compensation Commission rendered April 1, 1948. Certiorari was allowed by a justice of the former Supreme Court prior to September 15, 1948. Horsman Dolls, Inc., is a subject employer under the Unemployment Comp
Horsman v. Bigelowpublic domain
1 Reported in 239 N.W. 250. This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while a pedestrian crossing a street in the village of Browns Valley. He was struck by in automobile driven by defendant Howard Bigelow. At the close of the evidence for plaintiff the action was dismissed as to defendant L.C. Bigelow. The jury returned a verdict against the rem
7 N.J. 541 (1951) 82 A.2d 177 HORSMAN DOLLS, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 12, 1951. Reargued April 30 and May 7, 1951. Decided June 25, 1951. *543 Messrs. Herman D
The writ brings up for review "a certain order" rendered on July 14th, 1944, by the Unemployment Compensation Commission of the State of New Jersey in relation to the matter entitled "In the Matter of Horsman Dolls, Inc., then pending before William C. Nowels, Referee of the State of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Commission." The reasons filed are twenty-four in number but need not be reproduced at length. The history of the case shortly stated is, that the Compensation Commission, in
Horsman v. Allenpublic domain
The controversy in this action grows out of a schism in the Church of the United Brethren in Christ, occurring at the general conference of the church at York, Pennsylvania, in the year 1889. The Church of the United Brethren originated in a voluntary association of Protestants of various denominations at some period during the eighteenth century; and its original creed was simply that of the orthodox Protestant churches generally, but allowing divergencies in matters wherein they diff
The question presented by this appeal is the validity of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Commission by which the Commission "removed to itself" an appeal of Horsman Dolls, Inc., then pending before Mr. Nowels, employed by the Commission as a legal assistant, to whom it had been referred by the Commission. As a matter of procedure, the reference comes from the office of the Chief of Contributor's service. Mr. Nowels had been designated to act in the capacity of "referee" by the Commi
Horsman v. Brockton & Plymouth Street Railway Co.public domain
Braley, J. In the first case the plaintiff sues for personal injuries caused by a collision of the defendant’s car with the team which he was driving, while the second action is brought by the owner for damages to his horse and wagon. At the close of the evidence verdicts for the defendant were ordered, because the presiding judge * was of opinion as matter of law “ that it appeared that at the time o
Gaines v. Commonwealthpublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. Appellant, Donna Gaines, was charged with murder, abuse of a corpse, and tampering with physical evidence in connection with the shooting death of her husband, Greg Sigler, in late November of 2009. She was also charged with several counts of forgery because in the months following Sigler’s death, Appellant cashed several of his social security checks by forging his endo
Crystal Henley v. Sgt. Bill Brownpublic domain
BYE, Circuit Judge. Crystal Henley brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners and its members, Chief of Police Jim Corwin, and certain individual police officers, alleging constitutional violations under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The district court dismissed the action for failure to exhaust ad
Agriservices of Brunswick, LLC v. Jacobypublic domain
EDWARD R. ARDINI, JR., JUDGE James Jacoby ("Jacoby") appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Chariton County, Missouri ("trial court") in favor of AGRIServices of Brunswick, LLC ("ASB") on its claim to recover money owed as an unpaid balance on account and against Jacoby on his counterclaims *433for negligent and fraudulent mi