Cases

OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. Brandon Palakovic, a mentally ill young man who was imprisoned at the State Correctional Institution at Cresson, Pennsylvania (SCI Cresson), committed suicide after repeatedly being placed in solitary confinement. His parents, Renee and Darí-an Palakovic, brought this civil rights action after their son’s death. The District C

65 P.3d 980 (2003) 204 Ariz. 599 Deanna Laurel MEZEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Val FIORAMONTI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 02-0040. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. April 3, 2003. *982 Law Offices of Robert C. Houser, P.C. by Robert C. Houser and Franks Bodinet & Park, P.C.

Fairhurst, J. ¶1 — In this case, we are asked to decide whether the process for redeeming an impounded vehicle as set forth in RCW 46.55.120 is the exclusive remedy for a person whose vehicle is unlawfully impounded. We hold RCW 46.55.120 is not exclusive and, therefore, a person whose vehicle is unlawfully impounded may bring a conversion action against the authority that authorized the impoundment. I. STATEM

MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Benjamin Coleman brought this lawsuit to challenge a District of Columbia law that directed the sale of a lien on his home after he failed to pay a $133.88 property-tax bill. That law permitted the private purchaser of the lien to add $4,999 in interest, costs, and fees to Mr

196 P.3d 691 (2008) Mark POTTER, on behalf of himself and the class he represents, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE PATROL, a Washington State agency, Respondent. No. 79172-4. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued May 27, 2008. Decided November 26, 2008. *693 Adam J. Berger, Schroeter Goldmark & Bender,

LIABILITY OPINION AND ORDER AS TO PHASE 2A EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION 1180 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1180 III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1181 A. ADOC Facilities and Organizational Structure 1181 B. MHM Organizational Structure 1183 C. Summary of Factu

Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial before a military judge alone for knowingly exposing a 17-year-old male to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). It was established at trial that HIV is the disease-causing, viral agent in the incurable, fatal illness called AIDS (Acquired Immunity Deficiency Syndrome). After mixed pleas, he was found guilty of attempted

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Karen D. Schiff appeals from a divorce judgment, challenging the terms of visitation and the child support and spousal support awards. We affirm the trial court’s decision on visitation and spousal support, but reverse the decision on child support and remand for a redetermination of that award. I [¶ 2] Karen Schiff and Gary D. Schiff were married in Moorhead, M

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00286-CV Shirley Sawyer, Appellant v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. FM004649, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEM

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00286-CV Shirley Sawyer, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-1552 Filed March 30, 2022 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ALISA DANAE SUNDBY AND TAYLOR RAY SUNDBY Upon the Petition of ALISA DANAE SUNDBY, Petitioner-Appellee, And Concerning TAYLOR RAY SUNDBY, Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marion County, Robert B. Hanson, Judge.

Action in equity to reform a deed of trust describing a particular tract of real [478] estate (hereinafter referred to as tract #1) in Jefferson County so that it will describe another particularly described tract of real estate (hereinafter referred to as tract #2) in said county, and to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of tract #2, as made by the grantors to their daughter after the execution of the said deed of trust. Plaintiff seeks to subject tract #2 to the li

Portland Manufacturing Company, et al., 1 Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentPortland Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 3862-68 -- 3868-68United Stat

18 Cal.App.2d 408 (1937) H. E. RUSK et al., Appellants, v. RAYMOND JOHNSTON et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 11130. California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One. January 8, 1937. Diether & Delbridge for Appellants. Glen Behymer for Respondents. Bishop, J., pro tem. Out of the conflicting evidence the finding emerg

233 S.W.2d 746 (1950) CURLEE v. DONALDSON et al. No. 27909. St. Louis Court of Appeals, Missouri. November 2, 1950. *748 Wm. H. Leyhe, Jr., Kerth & Schreiber, Clayton, for appellants. George M. Hagee, Raymond F. McNally, Jr., St. Louis, for respondent. HOUSER, Judge (sitting by order of the Supreme Court). <

McWhorter, President: On the 20th day of March, 1894, William H. Anderson, the owner o.f a tract of thirty-five and one-fonrth acres of land in Wetzel County, together with his wife Lucinda J. Anderson, executed a deed of lease of the oil and gas in and upon said land to the South Penn Oil Company, said company to deliver in the pipe line to the credit of lessors, their heirs and assigns, free of cost, the equal one-eighth par

This cause of action comes here for hearing from the district court of Tulsa county, Okla. We will refer to the respective parties as they appeared in the trial court. The defendant is a private corporation, conducting a hospital in the town of Tulsa, Okla., for private gain. On or about the 15th day of February, 1915, the plaintiff, Mrs. Lottie Juby, was taken to said hospital for the purpose of being operated on for appendicitis. When she arrived at said hospital, she was a short time there