Cases

AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs Our Lady's Inn, the Archdiocesan Elementary Schools of St. Louis, O'Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC, and Frank O'Brien, Jr. (ECF No. 13), and the cross motion for summary judgment filed Defendant City of St. Louis (ECF No. 20). The matter has been extensively briefed and is ready for disposition. For

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 Pages 168–191 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT February 21, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-1336 Filed February 17, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RANDY LOUIS LINDERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper County, Richard B. Clogg, Judge. Randy Linderman appeals his conviction of first-degree murder. AFFIRMED.

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge. Lisa Reed (“Ms. Reed”) and Allen Skeen (“Mr. Skeen”) (collectively “Respondents”) filed a “Petition for Incorporation of Village of Table Rock” with the County Commission of Stone County, Missouri (“the County Commission”).1 The County Commission denied Respondents’ petition and Respondents appealed the matter to the Circuit Court of Stone County, Missouri. Following a he

Supreme Court No. 2019-388-C.A. (P1/15-2223A) No. 2019-415-C.A. (P1/07-2888A) (Concurrence and Dissent begins on page 62) State : v. : Louis Sinapi. :

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD37623

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jean Alix Louis, individually and as a representative of the estate of Jean Edny Louis, has sued the District of Columbia and Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) Officer Paul Riggins, in his individual and official capacity, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and assorted

200 F.Supp.2d 1053 (2001) Wilma WARREN, Plaintiff, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant. No. 4:00CV1057(MLM). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. August 23, 2001. *1054 *1055 Cathy Steele, Cathy Steele Law Office, P.C., Clayton, MO, for plain

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR STATE OF MISSOURI ex rel. ) No. ED99832 ARNIE C. DIENOFF, ) ) Respondent, ) ) vs. )

825 Argued and submitted May 31, 2018; reversed and remanded as to Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services, otherwise affirmed January 23, 2020 Erik Loyal REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION and Toyota Financial Services, foreign corporations, and Capitol Toyota, an Oregon corporati

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 06 2020, 8:20 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing

The opinion of the court was delivered by Luckert, J.: Prior Kansas appellate decisions require a sheriff to provide medical care to a prisoner in the sheriff s custody and a county to pay for the care if the prisoner is indigent and has no other means of payment. Relying on this caselaw, the University of Kansas Hospital Authority (Hospital Authority) sued the Board

USCA11 Case: 24-10139 Document: 59-1 Date Filed: 04/23/2025 Page: 1 of 111 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10139 ____________________ BRUCE HENRY,

504 F.3d 465 (2007) Jonathan Bruce REED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee. No. 05-70046. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 9, 2007. *466 *467

DAVIS, Justice: This proceeding, brought under the original jurisdiction of this Court, involves two consolidated petitions for writs of prohibition filed by the West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways (hereinafter referred to as “DOH”). In both petitions, DOH seeks to have this Court prohibit enforcement of orders entered by the Circuit Court of Wood County in two condemnation proceedings. The orders

OPINION The Harrisburg City Council, seeking control of the Harrisburg Authority, enacted Bill Number 36 of 2006, an ordinance giving it sole power to appoint members to the Harrisburg Authority's Board. Previously, Harrisburg's mayor, with City Council's advice and consent, appointed Board members to the Authority. Appellee Reed, then-mayor of Harrisburg, 1 vetoed the ordinance. Council over

724 S.E.2d 320 (2012) STATE of West Virginia ex rel. WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, Petitioner v. Honorable Jeffrey B. REED, Judge of the Circuit Court of Wood County; Randall Rapp; Lloyd Pannell; and Robin Pannell, Respondents. and State of West Virginia ex rel. West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Petitioner v. Honorable Jeffrey B. Reed, Judge of the Circuit Court of Wo

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Roderick Johnson filed multiple petitions under Pennsylvania’s PosWConvietion Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§ 9541-9546, unsuccessfully claiming that violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), undermined his conviction for first-degree murder

OPINION OF THE COURT JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge. 1. In this appeal, plaintiffs ask this court to reverse the trial court’s denial of their motion for attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs sought attorneys’ fees under the Civil Rights Attorneys’ Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1976), as prevailing parties in an action under the 1871 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976). The district court denied th