Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3047 HOWARD SMALLWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DON WILLIAMS, et al. Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dist

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3047 HOWARD SMALLWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DON WILLIAMS, et al. Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dist

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Heubel Materials Handling Company, Inc. (“Heubel”) and the Raymond Corporation (“Raymond”) appeal the order of the district court 1 granting summary judgment in favor of Universal Underwriters Insurance Company (“Universal”) on Heubel’s claim for coverage under a Universal insurance policy. The

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

DISSENTING OPINION JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the road was abandoned pursuant to § 228.190 because I believe the evidence establishes that the road had not been used by “the public” for a continuous period of at least five years. Eric Stack, Chad Cain, and Lute Cain (together, “Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s judgment declaring

902 P.2d 905 (1995) Daniel G. ORTIVEZ and Bonnie L. Ortivez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Scott Andrew DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93CA1920. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. March 23, 1995. Rehearing Denied April 20, 1995. Certiorari Granted September 25, 1995. *908 LeHouillier and Associates,

*608ORDER CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge. Notwithstanding factual distinctions between Louisiana’s and Mississippi’s public higher education systems, see, e.g., United States v. Louisiana, 692 F.Supp. 642, 656 n. 69 (E.D.La.1988), and respectfully disagreeing with the majority’s conclusion in Ayers v. Allain, 914 F.2d 676 (5th

ORDER & REASONS CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge. Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the Order of September 21, 1990 [R.Doc. No. 541], the parties have submitted in writing any objections to the proposed remedial order attached as Exhibit A of that Order (the “Proposed New Plan”).1 The Court rules as follows. The following parties have responded to the Order: the Un

671 F.Supp. 726 (1987) In re WICAT SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civ. No. C83-1117G. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. September 8, 1987. *727 Peter W. Billings, Jr., Rand M. Elison, Fabian & Clendenin, Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiffs Lee and Edith Woods, Bruce Youngman, Robert A. and Lou Ann Greco, William B. Weinberger.

OPINION AND ORDER ON THE REPRESENTATION OF THE STATE CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge. This case is before the Court on the motion of the Attorney General of the State of Louisiana to Designate Counsel for the State and Withdraw Designation of Additional Counsel [Record Document No. (R.Doc.) 517A]. Civil Action No. 90-4109 is also before the Court on the motion of the Attorney General to remand to st

865 F.Supp. 300 (1994) STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel., Carroll A. CAMPBELL, Jr., Governor of South Carolina and T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of South Carolina, Plaintiffs, v. Hazel R. O'LEARY, Secretary of Energy, and the United States Department of Energy, Defendants. Austrian Research Centre Seibersdorf, Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Riso National Laboratory of Denmark, and SKB Swedish Nuclear Fuel & Waste M

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: This is a diversity action for defamation brought by Robert A. Maheu against Hughes Tool Company, now named Summa Corporation (“Summa”). The defamatory statement was made by Howard Hughes, sole owner of Summa. I. Preliminary Observations. As it comes to us, the case is unusual in several respects. First, th

management of his finances. Albert created GWB Trust into which any interest he may have held in the Estate could be funneled. He then created Renhaw, Inc., and Pentex FILED IN Royalty Trust, 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS int

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM