Cases

Filed 5/13/25; Certified for Partial Pub. 6/11/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WATER AUDIT CALIFORNIA, F088084 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 22CV-03034) v. MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT,

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Brent Howard, Oklahoma State Senate, District 382024 OK AG 2Decided: 02/06/2024Oklahoma Attorney General Opinions Cite as: 2024 OK AG 2, __ __ ¶0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question: What instruments are no

OSCN Found Document:Question Submitted by: The Honorable Brent Howard, Oklahoma State Senate, District 38 Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case

Filed 1/17/14; pub. order 2/4/14 (see end of opn.) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL W. MORGAN et al., D060146, D061087 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Super. Ct. No. ECU04936 ) IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Defendant and Respo

HOCH, J. *771This appeal focuses on circumstances in which local water and irrigation districts may be entitled to subvention for unfunded state mandates. "Subvention" refers to claims by local governments and agencies in California for reimbursement from the state for costs of complying with state mandates for which the mandate does not conc

Filed 3/20/19; Opinion following rehearing CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, C081929 v.

Filed 1/31/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, E080870 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. RIC1904943) v.

Filed 7/9/19 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Amador) ---- HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION C082079 et al., (Super. Ct

Filed 6/14/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Amador) ---- HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION C082079 et al., (Super. Ct. No. 16CV9564) Plaint

HULL, J. *174*283Citizens submitted a referendum petition to challenge Amador Water Agency's Board Resolution No. 2015-19, adopting new water service rates for Agency customers. ( Cal. Const., art. II, § 9 [voters have referendum power to approve or rejec

HULL, J.- Citizens submitted a referendum petition to challenge Amador Water Agency's board resolution No. 2015-19 (Resolution), adopting new water service rates for Agency customers. (Cal. Const., art. II, §§ 9 [voters have referendum power to approve or reject state statutes except, e.g., tax levies], 11 [referendum power may be exercised by city and county electors under procedures provided by Legislatur

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge: This action is brought by the United States and the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe to quiet title to a water right to sustain the Pyramid Lake fishery. The question raised in this appeal is whether an equitable water adjudication filed by the government in 1913 and finalized in 1944 precludes this cause of action. In 1913 the United States filed in the U.S. District Court in Nevada an

649 F.2d 1286 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,andPyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,v.TRUCKEE-CARSON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, STATE OF NEVADA, SierraPacific Power Company, City of Reno, City of Sparks, Countyof Washoe, and Washoe County Treasurer, Trustee, Albert A.Alcorn, and Approximately 17,000 Other Individually NamedPersons, Firms, Partnerships, and Corporations, Defen

799 F.Supp.2d 1083 (2011) Michael E. TENNENBAUM, Plaintiff, v. ARIZONA CITY SANITARY DISTRICT; Francis J. Slavin PC; Francis J. Slavin, Carol J. Slavin, Defendants. No. CV-10-2137-PHX-GMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 29, 2011. *1084 David A. Weatherwax, Dewain D. Fox, Jamey Green Anderson, Sherman & Howard

SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Casitas Municipal Water District (“Casi-tas”) operates the Ventura River Project *843 (the “Project”). The Project, which is owned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (“BOR”), provides water to residential, industrial, and agricultural customers in Ventura County, California. Ve

Filed 11/26/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, E081996 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super.Ct.No. RIC1905897) v.

FILED MARCH 3, 2022 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE BROCK MASLONKA and

757 S.W.2d 34 (1988) Viola L. HABY, Appellant, v. Louis M. HOWARD and wife, Corrine Howard; Stanley R. Livesay, and wife, Joyce C. Livesay, Edward P. Gistaro, and wife, Marti Gistaro, Hugo C. Stolte, Jr., and Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control and Improvement District Number One, Appellees. No. 04-87-00413-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. June 29, 1988.

497 N.W.2d 53 (1993) 243 Neb. 5 Robert L. HOWARD, Appellant, v. CITY OF LINCOLN, Appellee. No. S-90-720. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 19, 1993. *55 Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellant. William F. Austin, Lincoln City Atty., and Dana W. Roper, Lincoln, for appellee. Before HASTINGS, C.J.

*334ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY BRADEN, Judge. Consistent with the March 31, 2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order issued, Plaintiff is ordered to submit Supplemental Direct Testimony from Mr. Brian P. Brinig, Brinig & Company, Inc., in the format of five tables and any supporting explanation: 1. Table A—a Summary