⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Howard v. Potter Distilleries”

Naranjo v. Paullpublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990-10-04 · Published · cited 46× · 803 P.2d 254; 111 N.M. 165
803 P.2d 254 (1990) 111 N.M. 165 Raymond NARANJO and Fil Naranjo Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Les PAULL and Mrs. Les Paull, Paull Petroleum Corporation, GF 83 Ltd. and ABO 84 Ltd., Defendants-Appellants and Cross Appellees. No. 11502. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. October 4, 1990. *255 R
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972-01-05 · Published · cited 5× · 186 S.E.2d 262; 257 S.C. 383; 1972 S.C. LEXIS 381
257 S.C. 383 (1972) 186 S.E.2d 262 STATE of South Carolina, Appellant-Respondent, v. PILOT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant. 19345 Supreme Court of South Carolina. January 5, 1972. *384 *385 Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Glen E. Craig</
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942-04-01 · Published · cited 5× · 164 S.W.2d 370; 350 Mo. 1; 1942 Mo. LEXIS 548
Action under our declaratory judgment act (Sec. 1126 et seq., R.S. 1939, 1 Ann. Stat. (1929), Sec. 1097a et seq., p. 1388 et seq.) to determine whether certain natural gas sales by plaintiff, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, are subject to our sales tax law (Sec. 11407 et seq., R.S. 1939, 12 Ann. Stat., Sec. 10164b et seq., p. 8118 et seq.). Resistance to the tax is on the ground that the gas sold is transported interstate by pipe line, and that under *Page 8<
District Court, D. Delaware · 1947-02-19 · Published · cited 6× · 71 F. Supp. 45; 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2665
71 F.Supp. 45 (1947) CANISTER CO. v. NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION. CANISTER CO., Inc., v. SAME. Civil Actions Nos. 309 and 365. District Court, D. Delaware. February 19, 1947. *46 Stuart N. Updike, J. Howard Carter, and John R. Schoemer, Jr. (of Townley, Updike & Carter), all of New York City, N. Y., and Hering, Morri
Mosso v. Leepublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 1931-02-04 · Published · cited 24× · 295 P. 776; 53 Nev. 176; 1931 Nev. LEXIS 13
Tender cannot be made after default where time is essence of contract. Kentucky Distilleries Co. v. Warwick Co., 109 Fed. 280; Kelsey v. Crowther (U.S.), 40 L.Ed. 1017. Tender is too late after a forfeiture has been declared. Sylvester v. Holaseck (Minn.), 86 N.W. 336; Whiteman v. Perkins (Neb.), 76 N.W. 547, at 549. At common law a tender of money which a party is bound to p
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930-01-13 · Published · cited 27× · 149 A. 190; 299 Pa. 236; 1930 Pa. LEXIS 592
Argued January 13, 1930. The Lansdowne Bank Trust Company, defendant, was formed, in 1927, by the merger of separate institutions. As a result, it became the owner of two buildings, which were no longer required for its corporate purposes. Arnold was president of the company, and a member of both the board of directors and the finance committee. The former met regularly once a month, and, between times, the latter, composed of six members of the board, convened weekly to transact any necessa
California Supreme Court · 1943-09-30 · Published · cited 114× · 22 Cal. 2d 818; 142 P.2d 297; 1943 Cal. LEXIS 226
22 Cal.2d 818 (1943) BRADSTREET MILLER, JR., Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents; PRENTISS M. BROWN, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, Intervener. S. F. No. 16905. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Sept. 30, 1943. Bradstreet Miller, Jr., in pro. per. for Petitioner. Robert W. Kenny, Attorney Gene
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909-09-14 · Published · cited 142× · 203 Mass. 159; 1909 Mass. LEXIS 919; 89 N.E. 193
Rugg, J. These are suits in equity, by which the plaintiff seeks to recover secret profits made by the defendant as one of its organizers, in selling to it while under the absolute control and management of himself and his associate, one Lewisohn, certain mining properties belonging to him and Lewisohn. The allegations of the bills are set out at length in 188 Mass. 315, where one of the cases was considered upon demurrer. After
Supreme Court of the United States · 1872-03-18 · Published · cited 37× · 81 U.S. 44; 20 L. Ed. 815; 14 Wall. 44; 1871 U.S. LEXIS 975
81 U.S. 44 (1871) 14 Wall. 44 HENDERSON'S DISTILLED SPIRITS. Supreme Court of United States. *48 Mr. B.H. Bristow, Solicitor-General, and Mr. C.H. Hill, Assistant Attorney-General, for the United States, plaintiffs in error. Mr. J.A. Garfield, contra. *52 Mr. Justice CLIFFORD del