Cases

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: Theodore Howze, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howze, No. 3:98-cr-00299-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2011). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argum

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th. Cir. Certiorari denied.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-1119 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RODNEY T. HOWZE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Rodney Howze fired a gun into the air to disperse a group of unruly teenagers. This was not a good idea: Howze, who had several criminal convictions, was not allowed to possess a gun, let alone fire one on a crowded street. He pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which prohibits felons from having guns. The prosecutor proposed to treat thre

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 474.

PER CURIAM: Ted David Howze appeals his conviction by the District Court, sitting without a jury, of willfully refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces, 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. The issue is whether Howze’s Local Board erred when it refused to reopen his classification after Howze submitted a SSS form 118 (“Dependency Questionnaire”) on January 20, 1966, 32 C.F.R. §§ 162

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

544 U.S. 1057 HOWZEv.YARBOROUGH, WARDEN, ET AL. No. 04-7743. Supreme Court of United States. May 23, 2005. 1 Petition for rehearing denied.

543 U.S. 1165 HOWZEv.YARBOROUGH, WARDEN, ET AL. No. 04-7743. Supreme Court of United States. February 22, 2005. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 92 Fed. Appx. 515.

[Cite as State v. Howze, 2024-Ohio-2701.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. Nos. 30824 30871 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT DEMETRIUS L. HO

[Cite as State v. Howze, 2025-Ohio-2630.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEREMY HOWZE, Defendant-Appellant.

540 U.S. 970 HOWZEv.BUTLER, WARDEN. No. 03-5997. Supreme Court of United States. October 20, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied.

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge. The appellant has been convicted of failing to remain in employment after he was assigned civilian work upon being classified 1-0 (conscientious objector) by his local draft board. Title 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 462. He appeals his conviction on three grounds: That he should have been classified II-C (essential

[Cite as State v. Howze, 2024-Ohio-5447.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEREMY HOWZE, Defendant-Appellant.

782 F.2d 1045 U.S.v.Howze 85-1978 United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. 12/6/85 1 C.D.Ill. AFFIRMED