⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Hubbard v. Yates”

Gay v. Hubbardpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 678 So. 2d 1156; 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 383; 1996 WL 263605
Toni Gay, as guardian and conservator of her aunt, Edna Morgan, appeals from a judgment in which the trial court divided certain insurance proceeds between Morgan and Morgan's daughter, Barbara Morgan Hubbard. We reverse and remand. Hubbard lived with Morgan in a home that Morgan had purchased. They held title to the home jointly, however, with right of survivorship. Hubbard had lived with her mother since approximately 1973 and had not worked since approximately 1989. The two
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 717 So. 2d 814; 1998 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 431; 1998 WL 307939
Barbara Hubbard appeals the dismissal of her claims against the City of Oxford (city) and the summary judgment entered in favor of the Calhoun County Humane Society (hereinafter referred to as the animal shelter). Our review of the record reveals the following: On February 14, 1995, the city arrested Hubbard and charged her with cruelty to animals. In connection therewith, the city seized Hubbard's 14 pomeranian dogs and delivered them to the animal shelter, pending the outcome
Hubbard v. Statepublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 15× · 422 P.3d 1260
By the Court, CHERRY, J.: *1262Appellant was convicted after a jury trial of conspiracy to commit robbery, burglary, seven counts of robbery with use of a deadly weapon, assault, and discharge of a firearm within a structure. The district court admitted evidence at trial concerning appellant's prior residential burglary conviction to prove i
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2023-03-02 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STACY HUBBARD, FOR PUBLICATION March 2, 2023 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:10
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NV 54
134 Nev., Advance Opinion 54 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CORY DEALVONE HUBBARD, No. 66185 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Fl ED Respondent. AUG 201
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NV 54
134 Nev., Advance Opinion 54 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CORY DEALVONE HUBBARD, No. 66185 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Fl ED Respondent. AUG 201
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-02-25 · Published · cited 365× · 191 L. Ed. 2d 64; 135 S. Ct. 1074; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1503; 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 93; 83 U.S.L.W. 4120; 2015 A.M.C. 626
Justice GINSBURGannounced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice BREYER, and Justice SOTOMAYOR join. John Yates, a commercial fisherman, caught undersized red grouper in federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico. To prevent federal authorities from confirming that he had harvested undersized fish, Yates ordered a crew member to toss the suspect catch
Ivey Corp. v. Yatespublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 516 So. 2d 558; 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4616; 1987 WL 1392
This is a fraud action regarding the sale of a new automobile. Pauline Yates complained of intentional, reckless, or negligent misrepresentations regarding the sale of a 1984 Toyota Corolla by Ivy Corporation, d/b/a Toyota of Anniston. Mrs. Yates alleged that Toyota of Anniston had sold the car to another buyer, who reneged, and then resold it to her as "new." The trial court submitted the fraud claim to a jury, which returned a general verdict in favor of Mrs. Yates and awarded damag
Madrigal v. Yatespublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2009-09-03 · Published · cited 4× · 662 F. Supp. 2d 1162; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81368; 2009 WL 2916808
662 F.Supp.2d 1162 (2009) Rafael MADRIGAL, Petitioner, v. James YATES, Warden, Respondent. Case No. CV 07-7251-GAF (MLG). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. September 3, 2009. *1166 Eric S. Multhaup, Eric S. Multhaup Law Offices, Mill Valley, CA, Jan Stiglitz, Jeffrey Chinn, Justin Brooks, California
Love v. Yatespublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2008-11-04 · Published · cited 2× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 1155; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106946; 2008 WL 4821612
(2008) Terrell LOVE, Petitioner, v. James A. YATES, Warden, Respondent. No. C 05-3995 JSW. United States District Court, N.D. California. November 4, 2008. ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Terrell Love ("Petitioner"), a prisoner of the State of California, has fi
McKettrick v. Yatespublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2008-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 627 F. Supp. 2d 1144; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78733; 2008 WL 4531945
627 F.Supp.2d 1144 (2008) Timothy C. McKETTRICK, Petitioner, v. James A. YATES, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 05-03002-RGK (VBK). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. October 6, 2008. *1148 Timothy C. McKettrick, Imperial, CA, pro se. Lance E. Winters, CAAG — Office of Attorney General of Californi
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997-05-30 · Published · cited 13× · 697 So. 2d 486; 1997 WL 283779
This case involves a petition for a modification of child support and visitation. The parties were divorced in 1988. While the divorce was pending, the wife was pregnant with a child whose paternity the husband questioned. After the birth of the child, the trial court rendered a divorce judgment awarding custody of the two sons to the wife and awarding the husband visitation rights as to the two children. After the divorce, the husband was judicially determined to be the younge
Hubbard v. Statepublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001-11-15 · Published · cited 16× · 819 So. 2d 1192; 2001 WL 1429272
819 So.2d 1192 (2001) Jeanette HUBBARD and Shirley James v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2000-KA-00849-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. November 15, 2001. Rehearing Denied December 11, 2001. *1193 Kevin L. Howe, Attorney for Appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Billy L. Gore, Attorneys for Appellee.
Hubbard v. Hallpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999-06-04 · Published · cited 1× · 739 So. 2d 498; 1999 WL 357450
Robert V. Hubbard (the father) and Kelli H. Hubbard Hall (the mother) were divorced in 1988. They had two sons. In 1995, they filed various petitions and counterpetitions seeking, among other things, a modification of the child support provision of the divorce judgment. The court found that no material change in circumstances had occurred and thus that no change in the father's child-support obligation was warranted. The mother appealed. As to the child-support issue, this court rever
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017-11-16 · Published · cited 1× · 280 F. Supp. 3d 908
ORDER Michael P. Mills, UNITED STATES' DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI This court presently has before it three motions for partial summary judgment filed in the above-entitled action. Having considered the memoranda and submissions of the parties, it is now prepared to rule. This action arises out of the construction of
Ohio Supreme Court · 2003-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 99 Ohio St. 3d 48
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I is allowed. Briefing is to proceed on Proposition of Law No. I. {¶ 2} The cause is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on Proposition of Law No. II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451, 2002-Ohio-6718, 780 N.E.2d 543. Robert J.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 780 N.E.2d 608; 150 Ohio App. 3d 241
OPINION {¶ 1} Appellants Tony and Sandra Yates, individually and as parents and legal guardian of Ashley Yates, appeal the decision of the Richland County Court that granted summary judgment on behalf of the Mansfield Board of Education ("Board"). The following facts give rise to this appeal. {¶ 2} At the time of the incident giving rise to this lawsuit, fifteen-year-old Ashley Yates was a f
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000-05-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2000-KA-00849-SCT JEANETTE HUBBARD AND SHIRLEY JAMES v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON MOTION FOR REHEARING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/03/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. R. KENNETH COLEMAN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CALHOUN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2002-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Opinion filed November 21, 2002 Affirmed and Opinion filed November 21, 2002.
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998-03-18 · Published · cited 10× · 958 P.2d 111; 125 N.M. 153; 1998 NMCA 058
958 P.2d 111 (1998) 125 N.M. 153 1998-NMCA-058 David HUBBARD d/b/a D.A.L.T. Trucking Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALBUQUERQUE TRUCK CENTER, LTD., a Wisconsin Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 17716. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 18, 1998. *112 Martin Lopez, III, Martin Lo