Cases

HUGHES, J. * [! This case presents the res nova issue of whether an attorney, representing an incarcerated felon, is subject to the provisions of La. R.S. 44:31.1, when making a public records request to obtain information relative to a potential post-conviction relief application. Both the district court and the appella

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Nam HONG, et al. Defendants. No. 07CR172S. United States District Court, W.D. New York. February 29, 2008. ORDER HUGH B. SCOTT, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The instant matters before the Court are three (Nam Hong, Man

(2008) David William MORAN, Plaintiff, v. DESIGNET INTERNATIONAL, et al., Defendants. No. 05-CV-459S. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 16, 2008. Decision & Order HUGH B. SCOTT, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is the plaintiffs motion to compel discovery; joinder of parties and the amendment of the complain

PER CURIAM: This appeal concerns our authority to review an order remanding an action based on an antecedent and erroneous ruling that an agreement to arbitrate was unenforceable. St. Hugh Williams filed in a Florida court a complaint that, while working onboard the MJV Norwegian Sky, he was injured as a result

PER CURIAM *1002AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2018, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals the dismissal of drug-trafficking charges and specifications against defendants-appellees, Varian Scott and Corey Troupe. We have consolidated the state's appeals for purposes of decision and judgment. The Offer to Sell {¶ 2} In a single indictment, Scott and Troupe were charged with trafficking in cocaine under R.C. 2925.0

CARNES, Circuit Judge: Dennis Scott Stewart, Stevie Hugh Stone, and Christopher Liff Daniel appeal their convictions for conspiracy to violate the civil rights of another, interference with the housing rights of another, and use of fire in the commission of a federal felony. Their three contentions are: that the district court improperly upheld the government’s Batson

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE CUNNINGHAM Developer, Furlong Development Company and its owner, Gordon Stacy, (collectively referred to as “Developer”), owned a 26-acre tract of real estate in Georgetown, Kentucky. Developer intended to develop the property into 90 single-family residential lots known as “The Enclave.” Developer secured financing through United Bank & Trust Company, (hereinafter “the Ba

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents a question that' has divided the federal courts: Can a statement about a single asset be a “statement respecting the debtor’s ... financial condition”? 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2). Ordinarily, a debtor cannot discharge any debt incurred by fraud, id. § 523(a)(2)(A), but a debtor can discharge a debt incurred by a false statement respecting his financial condition unless tha

EAGLES, Chief Judge. Defendant Ricky Earl Scott was convicted of first-degree kidnapping, assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury and maiming without malice. On appeal, defendant brings forth four arguments: (1) that the State failed to prove the elements *105of the maiming charge; (2) that the trial court erred by failing to dismiss

OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Cyndy Zamora (“Zamora”) timely filed a wrongful termination suit against her state government employer, the Tarrant County Hospital District (“the Hospital”), ten days before the jurisdictional filing deadline set by Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 21.254 (West 2015) expired. However, her attorney failed to serve t

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice In Spir Star AG v. Kimich1 the Texas Supreme Court upheld the exercise of jurisdiction over a German hose manufacturer which had sold one of its hoses to a wholly owned Texas subsidiary, who in turn sold it to a Texas end user, where it was alleged to have failed and caused injury. In this case, we are presented wit

PER CURIAM. Bridget L. Scott seeks review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) dismissing her petition for review as untimely filed. Scott v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 93 M.S.P.R. 448 (M.S.P.B.2003). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. I Ms. Scott appealed to the Board in 2000 from her removal by the Department of Veterans Affairs from

12/18/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 11, 2024 Session RACHEL POYNER HIGHT v. BILLY HUGH HIGHT Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 79084 Steven W. Maroney, Chancellor

584 F.3d 575 (2009) AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS, Retail Royalty Company, Appellees, v. LYLE & SCOTT LIMITED; Harris Watson Investment Limited, Appellants. No. 08-4807. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued May 21, 2009. Opinion Filed: September 11, 2009. *577 Emily J. Barnhart, Esq., Dennis P. M

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 14-0819 ════════════ CADENA COMERCIAL USA CORP. D/B/A OXXO, PETITIONER, v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT ═════════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, Causey and Senior Judge Haley Argued at Richmond, Virginia HUGH CAMERON GREEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0643-22-2 JUDGE RANDOLPH A. BEALES OCTOBER 10, 2023

644 F.Supp.2d 624 (2008) AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS, INC. and Retail Royalty Company, Plaintiffs, v. LYLE & SCOTT LIMITED and Harris Watson Investment Limited, Defendants. Case No. 2:06-cv-00607-ARH. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. November 26, 2008. *629 Cynthia E. Kernick, Clay P. Hughes, Kirsten R. Rydstrom

414 F.Supp.2d 469 (2006) M.K.B., O.P., LW., MA., Marieme Diongue, M.E., P.E., Anna Fedosenko, A.I., L.A.M., L.M., Denise Thomas, and J.Z., on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor children and all others similar situated, Plaintiffs, v. Verna EGGLESTON, as Commissioner of the New York City Human Resources Administration; Robert Doar, as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance; and Antonia C. Novel

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Katsas. Wilkins, Circuit Judge: This case concerns whether the District Court properly dismissed based on mootness the claims of an incarcerated prisoner. Because the allegations in Gordon Reid's Complaint logically fall within a mootness exception for claims "capable of repetition, yet evading review," we reverse the decision of the District Court and rema