Cases

Deemer, J. The ease involves a construction of paragraph.2 of section 1304 of the Code Supplement as it existed when the taxes complained of were levied against certain real estate in Emmet county. That part of the section referred to, so far as material, reads as follows: The following classes of property are not to be taxed: . . . (2) All grounds and buildings used for public libraries, including lib

IN THE TENNESSEE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AT JACKSON MARCH 1999 SESSION FILED December 8, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. VICTOR JAMES CAZES, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) No. W1998- 0038

JAMES R. NORVELL, Special Justice. This is an appeal from the final judgment rendered in Cause B-20,576 on the docket of the District Court of Hidalgo County, 93rd Judicial District, styled, The State of Texas, et al v. Hidalgo County Water Control and Improvement District No. Eighteen, et al, and commonly referred to as the Lower Rio Grande Valley Water Suit. In Hidalgo & Cameron Counties Water Control & Improvement D

286 F.Supp. 998 (1968) Feaster James BROWN, Petitioner, v. The STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Ellis C. MacDougall, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondents. Richard GATES and Fred Lee Painter, Petitioners, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Ellis C. MacDougall, the Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondents. Jerry L. PERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Ellis C. MacDougall, Director

McArthur Brothers Mercantile Company, an Arizona corporation, with its principal place of business at Phoenix, brought this action against Wells Fargo Company of Mexico, S.A., a foreign corporation, to recover $3,700, the alleged value of an armoured motor-truck which, it was averred, the latter held as bailee and failed to deliver to the plaintiff, the bailor, when requested to do so. Judgment for $1,000 in favor of the plaintiff was rendered upon the verdict of a jury and the defendant has

307 F.Supp. 841 (1970) William Horace QUEEN, Plaintiff, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al., Defendants. J. C. McCRARY, Plaintiff, v. T. A. EDMONDS, Supervisor, Data Processing Center, et al., Defendants. Paul Ulysses DEMPS, Plaintiff, v. William D. LEEKE, Director, J. W. Strickland, Warden, Central Correctional Institute, et al., Columbia, S. C., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 69-831 to 69-8

196 N.W.2d 209 (1972) In the Matter of the LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTING OF the GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the State of Iowa as Enacted By the 64th General Assembly of the State of Iowa, House File 732. Louise NOUN et al., Applicants, Hugh D. Clark and James J. Wengert, Applicants, Clifton Larson, Applicant, v. Richard C. TURNER, Respondent. Nos. 55021-55023. Supreme Court of Iowa.

Donnelly (James F.), Referee. By determination of the Court of Appeals made at the end of the domestic liquidation of five Russian insurance companies whose surpluses could not be remitted to domiciliary receivers in Russia because of non-recognition of that country in 1931, the surplus of each “ that, might otherwise be *907lost ” was directed to be turned over to “ dire

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, sues Bureau of Prisons Director Charles E. Samuels, Jr., for declaratory and injunctive relief. See Am. Compl., ECF No. 24. Plaintiff claims that the failure to provide him with Pennsylvania state legal materials during hi

ORDER WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant, Advance Stores Company, Inc.’s Motion For Summary Final Judgment (DE 20). The Court has carefully reviewed said Motion, the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Plaintiff Francisco Cruz, a former customer of Defendant Advance Stores Company, initiated the

740 F.Supp.2d 83 (2010) Montgomery Carl AKERS, Plaintiff, v. Harrell WATTS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0140 (EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 24, 2010. *87 Montgomery Carl Akers, Florence, CO, pro se. Kenneth Adebonojo, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, Daniel P. Struck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-0140 (EGS)

238 F.Supp.2d 1309 (2002) Elizabeth SIEK, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendants. No. 02-21071 CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. August 26, 2002. *1310 Michael Kenneth Decker, Persaud & Decker, Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiff. Emmet Jay Schwartzman, Robert Wayne Hudson, Carlton

764 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and counter-defendant, v. Gordon H. PORATH and Georgina M. Porath, Defendants and counter-plaintiffs. Case No. 08-10166. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 3, 2011. *888 Douglas W. Snoeyenbos, Christine Hooks, U.S. Department of Jus

211 F.Supp.2d 931 (2002) Margaret E. ROSE, Plaintiff, v. KENYON COLLEGE, et al., Defendants. Nos. C2-00-1299, C2-00-1378. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 29, 2002. *932 OPINION AND ORDER MARBLEY, District Judge. On November 6, 2000, plaintiff Margaret E. Rose ("Ros

629 F.Supp. 1474 (1986) Margaret E. TEDESCO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Stephen A. MISHKIN, et al., Defendants. No. 82 Civ. 8753 (DNE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 25, 1986. *1475 Bailey, Marshall & Hoeniger, New York City (Mitchell M. Bailey and Berthold H. Hoeniger and Neil V. Getnick, of counsel), for

556 F.Supp. 769 (1983) Don A. CARLOS, d/b/a D & S Business Systems, D & S Word Processing Systems and Diskriter, Plaintiff, v. PHILIPS BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. 81-CV-2569. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 16, 1983. *770 Emmet, Marvin & Martin by Dennis C. Fleischmann, New York City,

A contract must be construed as a whole, and each part considered, and if possible give an effect in connection with the entire agreement. Russell v. Garrett, 208 Ala. 92,93 So. 711; Southern Cafeteria Operating Company, Inc. v. Eley,52 Ala. App. 656, *Page 669 296 So.2d 743. The minds of the parties

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment. According to the undisputed evidence of the State, on the morning of December 27, 1975, Mrs. Katie McAuley, 69 years of age, was found lying on the ground on her back on the north side of Mildred Street, Montgomery. She had been killed by a bullet passing at an angle from the left side of her nose and completely transecting the brain. Soon after the arrival of her body at the funeral home,

948 F.Supp. 1310 (1996) Gary BURRIS, Petitioner, v. Al C. PARKE, Respondent. No. 3:95-CV-0917 AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. December 26, 1996. *1311 *1312 *1313 Alan Freedman, Bruce Bornstein, Gary Prichard, Freedman a