Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hulsh v. Hulsh”
Hulsh v. Hulshpublic domain
2024 IL App (1st) 221521 SIXTH DIVISION June 28, 2024 No. 1-22-1521 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT VIERA HULSH,
Hulsh v. Hulshpublic domain
2025 IL 130931 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 130931) VIERA HULSH, Appellant, v. MAYA HULSH et al., Appellees. Opinion filed May 22, 2025. JUSTICE O’BRIEN delivered the judgment of the court, with
Hulsh v. Hulshpublic domain
431 So.2d 658 (1983) Marcella Brosilow HULSH and Fred Brosilow, Appellants, v. Rea R. HULSH, Appellee. No. 81-1299. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 3, 1983. Rehearing Denied June 7, 1983. *660 Lapidus & Stettin, Herbert Stettin and Robert P. Frankel, Miami, for appellants. Loui
Weigend v. Hulshpublic domain
Mr. Justice O’Connor delivered the opinion of the court. This action is brought by five plaintiffs each one claiming to have an individual, separate and independent cause of action against the two defendants to recover damages based upon a conspiracy entered into by the two defendants to defraud plaintiffs out of their money. The complaint was in six counts. De
Browne v. Hulshpublic domain
Appeal dismissed on Motion of Counsel for Appellant.
R. Hulsh v. Bertman Isenpublic domain
Affirmed.
Jorge Mendia v. Abraham Figueroa Galvezpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 27, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-0798 Lower Tribunal No. 21-5039-CP-02 ________________ Jorge Mendia, Appellant
Garcia v. CELESTRONpublic domain
2 So.3d 1061 (2009) Mercy GARCIA, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nicolaz Maqueira, Appellant, v. Dulce CELESTRON, Maria Carmona, and Juaquina Escar, individually, and as Beneficiaries of the Estate of Nicolaz Maqueira, Appellees. No. 3D08-548. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 4, 2009.
Freemon v. Foleypublic domain
911 F.Supp. 326 (1995) Jimmye FREEMON, Plaintiff, v. Steve FOLEY, WIC Program Director, Gilda Ivy, WIC Western Site Assistant Coordinator, Juan Corbin, Acting Assistant Supervisor, Steven Hulsh, Vice President of Human Resources, and Mount Sinai Hospital Medical Center of Chicago, Defendants. No. 95 C 209. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November
Steffens v. Evanspublic domain
70 So.3d 758 (2011) Andrea S. STEFFENS, as surviving spouse of decedent, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Steffens, Appellant, v. Denise EVANS, as parent and natural guardian of S.S. and A.S., minors, Appellee. No. 4D10-2467. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 5, 2011. Mark R. Manceri of Mark R. Manceri, P.A., For
FARINACCI v. Statepublic domain
29 So.3d 1212 (2010) Richard Scott FARINACCI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D08-2336. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 17, 2010. *1213 Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Christine C. Geraghty, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney G
Phillips v. Estate of Holzmannpublic domain
740 So.2d 1 (1998) Jo Ellen PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. The ESTATE OF Marie M. HOLZMANN, Appellee. No. 98-765. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 25, 1998. *2 John C. Adams, Coral Gables, for appellant. Bartmon & Bartmon, and Richard G. Bartmon, Boca Raton; Kevin H. Hendrickson, Fort Pierce, for
James v. Jamespublic domain
843 So.2d 304 (2003) Robert JAMES, et al., Appellants, v. Rosalie Kaye Bruno JAMES, Appellee. No. 5D02-1565. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 7, 2003. Rehearing Denied April 23, 2003. *305 Ric Woodward, Melbourne, for Appellants. Michael R. Riemenschneider and William H. Cantwell,
Goldenberg v. Goldenpublic domain
769 So.2d 1144 (2000) Nicole Dirado GOLDENBERG, Appellant, v. Eunice GOLDEN, individually, Robin Golden Polte, individually, and Paul K. Wiener, individually and Co-Trustee under Will of Sam Wiener dated June 22, 1972, and Marvin Selig and Clyde Selig, as Co-Trustees under Will of Sam Wiener dated June 22, 1972, Appellees. No. 3D99-2966. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/06/2026 12:08 AM CST - 882 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP V. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO. Cite as 320 Neb. 882 Green Plains Trade Group LLC et al., plaintiffs,
Bauerle v. Brushpublic domain
PETERSON, J. Donald C. Bauerle, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donald C. Bauerle, Sr. (Bauerle), initiated action' against Janet C. Brush on a $50,000 promissory note dated April 4, 1995 payable to Donald C. Bauerle, Sr. (Decedent). Brush affirmatively pled lack of consideration alleging that the Decedent had made a gift to her of the money evidenced by the note and never intended to enforce the note. <
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/27/2026 08:09 AM CST - 882 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP V. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO. Cite as 320 Neb. 882 Green Plains Trade Group LLC et al., plaintiffs,
Arcangel v. Yardi Systems, Inc.public domain
2026 IL App (1st) 242062 No. 1-24-2062 SIXTH DIVISION May 22, 2026 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
In re Estate of Wadsworthpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT KIM C. HAMMOND, Circuit Judge. ORDER ON PETITION TO DETERMINE HOMESTEAD THIS CAUSE was heard on the Third day of January, 1989 on the Petition of FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA and JAMES W. BURKE as Co-Personal Representatives of the estate of LEWIS E. WADSWORTH to determine homestead real property and the Court has heard argument for the petitioners;
Fabian v. Ryanpublic domain
DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge. We affirm the judgment below upon a holding that although parol evidence was admissible to establish the terms and conditions of an option to buy where such terms and conditions were obviously omitted from the lease between the appellant and Mabel *11Ryan, the appellee’s decedent,1 Jackson v. Parker, 153 Fla