Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Humberto M. Santos”
Commonwealth v. Santospublic domain
SHIN, J. *43 *558 We decide in this case whether the defendant's failure to supervise her three year old daughter, both inside and outside the home, gives rise to probable cause to believe that she
United States v. Fernandez-Santospublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Diego Fernandez-Santos (“Fernandez”)’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, (Docket No. *16372). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES defendant Fernandez’s motion. Background On February 13, 2014, defendant Fernandez was arreste
State v. Santospublic domain
40 So.3d 167 (2010) STATE of Louisiana v. Jose C. SANTOS. No. 09-KA-789. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. April 13, 2010. *169 Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Thomas J. Butler, Michael D. Smith, Assistant District Attorneys, Parish of Jefferson, Gretna, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee. B
United States v. Humberto Santos-Garcia, United States of America v. Mario Sanchez-Nunezpublic domain
MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Humberto Santos-Garcia (Santos)' and Mario Sanchez-Nunez (Sanchez) appeal from judgments entered in the district court 1 following their: convictions arising from a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Santos challenges the district court’s denial of his suppression motion. Sanchez chall
State v. Gonzalezpublic domain
To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002784-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
State v. Gonzalezpublic domain
ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002784-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
United States v. H. Santos-Garciapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 01-3941 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Humberto Santos-Garcia, * * Appellant.
Buzzi v. Quality Service Station, Inc.public domain
GERSTEN, J. (concurring). I respectfully concur. I believe that the trial court properly granted partial final summary judgment in favor of Quality Service Station, Inc. (“Quality”) and Agus-tín Alcantara (“Alcantara”). The trial court properly granted summary judgment because: (1) there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding Luis Buzzi’s (“Buz-zi”) violation of Motiva Inc.’s (“Motiva”) rules and regul
Bustillo-Formoso v. Million Air San Juan Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge Pedro Bustillo-Formoso (“Bustillo”) brought this action against Million Air San Juan Corp. (“Million Air”) and Thomas Hill (“Hill”), in his individual capacity and as president of Million Air, alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 US.C. §§ 12101 et seq.; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
185 F.Supp.2d 117 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. A GROUP OF ISLANDS KNOWN AS "CAYOS DE BARCA" TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, ATTACHMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, LOCATED OFFSHORE SALINAS, PUERTO RICO; et als, Defendants. No. 93-1299(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 30, 2001. Jose J. Santos-Mimoso, United States Attorney's O
In Re Sosapublic domain
980 S.W.2d 814 (1998) In re Lydia SOSA. No. 04-97-00975-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. September 30, 1998. Hugo Xavier De Los Santos, San Antonio, for Appellant. *815 Humberto G. Garcia, Johnson, Curney, Garcia & Farmer, P.C., San Antonio, for Appellee. Before HARDBERGER, C.J., and RICKHOFF and GREEN, JJ.</
Ríos Martínez v. Comisión Local de Eleccionespublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Feliberti Cintrón emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Existen términos y disposiciones en nuestro ordena-miento que, aunque detallados y elaborados en algunos as-pectos, resultan ambiguos o incompatibles con otras dispo-siciones aplicables, dejando así un vacío jurídico que crea situaciones de incertidumbre, en su aplicación, a la ciudadanía. En esos casos, los tribunales estamos llamados a ejerc
Ulloa v. Fancy Farms, Inc.public domain
SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, United States District Judge *1328This case is before the Court on the parties' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Doc. No. 93, 94). The Court previously entered summary judgment in favor of Defendant Fancy Farms on Plaintiffs' Fair Labor Standards Act claim (Doc. No. 74), and the parties have stipulated that the Court can resolve Pl
United States v. Diaz-Antunuezpublic domain
OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Defendant Henry Diaz-Antunuez is one of nineteen persons charged in this case with offenses related to the gang MS-13. He moves to dismiss the federal court indictment as it relates to him. The lengthy Superseding Indictment charges other Defendants with crimes under federal law, such as conspiracy to violate
NUMBER 13-15-00296-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE BENEVIS, LLC, DENTRISTRY OF BROWNSVILLE, P.C., AND KOOL SMILES, P.C. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez, Benavides, and
United States v. Michelpublic domain
ORDER CEREZO, District Judge. In this fourteen-defendant criminal action for violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 955a(a), 955a(f) codefendants Walter Silva-Pinches and Eberto ArdilaHerrera filed a Motion for Severance on April 19, 1984 and a second Motion for Severance on June 20, 1984 to which the government replied on April 25 and June 26, 1984. They contend that their trials should be severed
Dominique Ramsey v. David Rivardpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0161p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DOMINIQUE RAMSEY; TRAVIS SAMMONS, │ Plaintiffs
Junta de Residentes Urb. Rincón Español Recurrida v. Geralda Cruz Meléndez, Edwin Martínez, Héctor Pagán Maldonado, Roger Frías Berríos, Fernando Sosa, Vivian Rodríguez Peticionarios Junta de Residentes Urb. Rincón Español Recurrida v. Humberto J. Lora Mercedes Peticionario Certiorari Junta de Residentes Urb. Rincón Español 2019 TSPR 123
Cedeño v. Sur Med Medical Centerpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. On October 12, 2012, Eliezer Rodriguez Cedeño (“Plaintiff’) filed the instant action under the court’s diversity jurisdiction, alleging medical malpractice against St. Luke’s Hospital d/b/a Hospital San Lucas (“St. Luke’s or Defendant”) and various other defendants. (Docket No. 1.) Pending before the court is Defendant’s motion for partial sum
Urias-Orellana v. Garlandpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1042 DOUGLAS HUMBERTO URIAS-ORELLANA; SAYRA ILIANA GAMEZ-MEJIA; G.E.U.G., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS