⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Humphrey v. Botello”

Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE INTREPID INVESTMENTS, LLC, directly ) and derivatively on behalf of SELLING ) SOURCE, LLC N/K/A SPEEDWELL ) HOLDINGS, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12077-NAC ) LONDON BAY CAPITAL, LLC, LONDON ) BAY FUND I, LLC, LONDON BAY - T
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-01-17 · Published · cited 26× · 913 F.3d 930
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LOUIS TAYLOR, a single man, No. 17-16980 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:15-cv-00152-RM COUNTY OF PIMA, a body politic; CITY OF TUCSON, a body politic, OPINION Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States Distr
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Jun 16 2015, 8:59 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Stephen T. Owens Gregory F. Zoell
Supreme Court of the United States · 1994-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 1065
*1065ante, p. 831; ante, p. 975; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 944; ante, p. 931; *1066No. 93-303.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-08-29 · Published · cited 4901× · 693 F.3d 896
Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN. OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: This § 1983 case concerns allegations of unlawful conduct by officials in the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office (“MCSO”) and the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (“MCAO”), conduct which culminated in the late-night arrests of Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, owners of the Ph
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN;  PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity, No. 09-15703 JOSEPH ARPAIO, Sheriff, and AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife; DENNIS  D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997- WILENCHIK and BECKY BARTNESS, SRB husband and wife; JOHN DOES I-X; JA
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 4956355 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2