Cases

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Justine Michael, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on

Per Curiam. In In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954, and Manning v. Alexander (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264, we held that appeal, not habeas corpus, was the proper remedy to claim ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204, we held at paragraph two of the syllabus: “Cl

702 F.Supp.2d 588 (2010) William Thomas BAUBERGER, Petitioner, v. Grady J. HAYNES, Supt. of Warren Correctional Inst., Respondent. No. 1:08cv15. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 17, 2010. *590 Kearns Davis, Brooks Pierce McLendon Humphrey & Leonard, Greensboro, NC, David Lybrook Neal, David L. Neal, At

666 F.Supp.2d 558 (2009) William Thomas BAUBERGER, Petitioner, v. Grady J. HAYNES, Supt. of Warren Correctional Inst., Respondent. No. 1:08cv15. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. October 27, 2009. *560 Kearns Davis, Brooks Pierce McLendon Humphrey & Leonard, Greensboro, NC, David Lybrook Neal, David L. Neal,

Page 28 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL July 1, 2025 236 JULY, 2025 352 Conn. 236 State v. Haynes STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. VERNON HAYNES (SC 20794) Mullins, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js.

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE’S AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL UPRIGHT LAW TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS SUZANNE H. BAUKNIGHT, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Several contested matters are pending before the Court concerning Law Solutions Chicago LLC dba UpRight Law LLC (“UpRight Law”) (see Mem. & Order entered Jan. 5, 2017 ['Wright Doc. 158]1). On

03/07/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 22, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAMISHA LANEA HAYNES Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. 22C-2021-CR-294 Larry J. Wallace, Judge ______________________________

Syllabus by the Court A condition of probation that appellant avoid a one and one-half mile area surrounding a drug house does not unreasonably restrain appellant's constitutional rights. OPINION Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced appellant to a stayed 15-month term, with three years probation, including *Page 103 an order e

24 So.3d 966 (2009) Elliot J. JENKINS, Charles E. Jenkins and Patrick Holden v. Sam B. HAYNES, Jr. d/b/a Haynes Motor Lines, Joe Doe and Legion Insurance Company. No. 2008-CA-0783. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. November 12, 2009. Rehearing Denied December 9, 2009. Tamara Kluger Jacobson, Robert G. Harvey, Sr., New Orleans, LA, for Pl

OPINION WALKER, Presiding Judge. The defendant below appeals in error from his conviction of (1) rape and sentence to 75 years in the penitentiary and (2) kidnapping and sentence to two to five years concurrent with the rape sentence. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. The defendant and Vivian Faye Haynes, parents of two children, were divorced February 1, 1974. The state’s

656 F.Supp.2d 783 (2009) April HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF LANSING, A Municipal Corporation, Lansing Police Department, Officer Michael Hynek #332, Officer Klingelschmidt #327, Officer Yonkers #303, Officer Tatgenhorst # 329, Officer Heintz # 321, and Officer Hasse #324, Defendants. No. 07 C 3125. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 26, 20

282 F.Supp.2d 488 (2003) Dwayne BOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. William S. HAYNES, Warden Huttonsville Correctional Center; Jim Rubenstein, Commissioner, West Virginia Department of Corrections, in their official and individual capacities; Pat Graham, Counselor; Albert Fordyce, Counselor, in their individual capacities, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 2:02 CV 36. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia.<

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-09-00004-CV DR. LINDA C. HAYNES, Appellant v. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY, Appellee From the 414th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2004-1888-5

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Thomas A. Haynes, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner vs) No. 15-1203 (Harrison County 14-C-145) Antero Resources Corporation and Eddie Rush Southern, Defendants Below, Respondents MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Thomas A. Haynes, by counsel Stephen A. Wickland, appeals the November 18, 2015, order of the Circuit Court of Harrison County that denied his motio

Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion filed June 30, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals <

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 108 Appellant was convicted on an indictment charging him with receiving, concealing, etc., one Johnson outboard motor, of the value of $465.00, the personal property of J.N. Chisholm, knowing it was stolen and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. Before the trial defendant moved to quash the

STANLEY, Commissioner. The appeal is from a judgment rendered upon a verdict for the defendants, James K. Froehlich and wife, in a suit upon their promissory note given the appellant, Louise Haynes, for $2,655 credited by several payments, which reduced the amount claimed to $1,938.75, with interest. The attorney for the appellees, H. Randolph Kramer, has not filed a brief, although he has been repeatedly

512 F.Supp. 1321 (1981) Bill G. HUMPHREYS, Plaintiff, v. J. R. PIERCE, Jr., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 79-0151-B. United States District Court, W. D. Virginia. May 6, 1981. *1322 Carl E. McAfee, Norton, Va., for plaintiff. Robert T. Winston, Norton, Va., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GLEN

Haynes, C. Plaintiff is the owner of about five acres of land upon which he resides, and is also the owner of one hundred and sixty acres separated from the residence parcel by intervening lands of the defendant, over which the plaintiff claims a right of way between his two parcels. The defendant having denied the plaintiff’s right and closed up the way, this action is brought to establish plaintiff’s right, and to recover damag