Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hussey v. Ac&S Inc”
Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.public domain
PROST, Circuit Judge. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Teva”) along with Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (collectively, “Ranbaxy”) appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”) and Warner-Lambert Company, L.L.C. (“Warner-Lamb
Matthews v. Eichorn Motors, Inc.public domain
OPINION WRIGHT, Judge. In this appeal from summary judgment dismissing appellant’s claims against respondents for aiding and abetting sexual harassment, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363A.14 (2010), and declining to impose vicarious liability under the responsible-corporate-officer doctrine, appellant argues that there are genuine issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment and that the district
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 11-MAR-2020 09:48 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
679 F.Supp.2d 969 (2009) PULSE ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff, v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Insurance Company of North America, the North River Insurance Company, Industrial Indemnity Company, and the Central National Insurance Company of Omaha., Defendants. No. 1:06-cv-1237-LJM-JMS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. December 18, 2009.
All Trac Transportation, Inc. v. Transportation Alliance Bank (In Re All Trac Transportation, Inc.)public domain
306 B.R. 859 (2004) In re ALL TRAC TRANSPORTATION, INC., Debtor. All Trac Transportation, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Transportation Alliance Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-37005-SAF-11, Adversary No. 02-3390. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. February 17, 2004. *860 *861</
Cushman v. Husseypublic domain
Moran, J. Sardius Boger and 518 others, legal voters of the city of Princeton, Indiana, filed a peti*465tion as provided by statute, asking that an election be held to determine whether the sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage should be prohibited within the city of Princeton. After the filing of the petition, appellant, designating himself, as a remonstrator and ta
Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.public domain
799 A.2d 71 (2002) Charlotte ANDALORO, Appellee, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AC & S Corp., Celotex Corporation, Eagle Picher Industries, Inc., Fiberboard Corp., Gas Corporation, Garlock, Inc., H.K. Porter Co., Inc., Keene Corporation, National Gypsum Co., Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens Brockway Glass Container, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corp., Raymark Industries, Inc., Southern Textile Co., Turner-Newall, Ltd., U.S. Gypsum Co.,
Warner-Lambert Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.public domain
SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Teva”) appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey that (1) U.S. Patent No. 4,743,450 (“the ’450 patent”) owned by Warner-Lambert Company (“Warner-Lambert”) was not invalid by reason of non-enablement; (2) Teva infringes the ’450 patent; and (3) the ’450 patent is not
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-CA-01926-SCT CLAUDIA A. LIMBERT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN H ER O FFICIAL CAPACITY; M ISSISSIPPI UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MISSISSIPPI STATE INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING v. M ISSISSIPPI U NIV ER SIT Y FO R WOMEN ALUMNAE ASSOCIATION, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/28/2007 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DOROTHY WINSTON COLOM COURT FROM
Citizens Interested in Bull Run, Inc. v. Edringtonpublic domain
781 F.Supp. 1502 (1991) CITIZENS INTERESTED IN BULL RUN, INC., an Oregon nonprofit corporation and Frank Gearhart, an individual and citizen of the State of Oregon, Plaintiffs, v. Michael S. EDRINGTON, in his individual capacity and as supervisor of the Mt. Hood National Forest; F. Dale Robertson, in his individual capacity and as Chief of the Forest Service; and the United States of America, Defendants, Brazier Forest Products of Oregon, Inc
204 Cal.App.2d 105 (1962) 22 Cal. Rptr. 216 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WESTERN AIR LINES, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 19344. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. May 28, 1962. *108 Darling, Shattuck & Edmonds, Darling, Shattuck,
United States v. Shannon Donohopublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2489 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHANNON DONOHO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
United States v. Shannon Donohopublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2489 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHANNON DONOHO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Newman v. LSU Health Sciences Center Shreveportpublic domain
STONE, J. ' 11 Jane Newman and her three adult children, Linda Canady, Henry Newman, and Darrell Newman, filed suit against Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport and Dr. Patrick Juneau, III, M.D., alleging that the hospital’s and doctor’s negligence caused the death of Clifton Newman. A jury found that neither the hospital’s nor the doctor’s actions breached the standard of care. For the following reas
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tambonepublic domain
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. In this enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “the Commission”), the Commission seeks to hold defendants James R. Tambone and Robert Hussey, executives of Columbia Funds Distributor, Inc., the primary underwriter for the Columbia family of mutual funds, responsible both as primary violators of the federal securities laws and as aiders and abettors of uncharged pr
Mahmoud v. Taylorpublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 522–655 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Johnson v. Aqua Pool Co.public domain
CASANUEVA, Judge. Keith and Lucy Johnson (the Johnsons) appeal a final judgment in favor of Aqua Pool Co., Inc. (Aqua Pool), foreclosing a construction lien. We determine that the trial court did not fully assess the adverse impact the Johnsons suffered because of the errors appearing on the face of Aqua Pool’s claim of lien. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment entered on behalf of Aqua Pool and remand for further pro
Happel v. Guilford Cnty. Bd. of Educ.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 86PA24 Filed 21 March 2025 EMILY HAPPEL, individually, TANNER SMITH, a minor, and EMILY HAPPEL on behalf of TANNER SMITH as his mother v. GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and OLD NORTH STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY, INC. On discretionary appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 292 N.C. App. 563, 899 S.E
General Refractories Co. v. First State Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM L. FELIPE RESTREPO, District Judge. Plaintiff General Refractories Company (“GRC”), a manufacturer and supplier of refractory products that at times contained some asbestos, sues its insurance carriers for a declaration of excess insurance coverage against underlying asbestos-related lawsuits and breach of insurance contract. Since about 1978, GRC has been named as a defendant in many
Hasegawa v. Fangpublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 11-MAY-2026 08:15 AM Dkt. 200 MO NOS. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX