Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1279 BRIAN HUSSEY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE; CHRISTINE ELOW, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Cambridge Police Department, Defendants, Appellees, BRANVILLE G. BARD, JR., in his individual capacity, Defendant.

498 F.Supp. 594 (1980) Edward C. HUSSEY, Plaintiff, v. James Leo SULLIVAN, City Manager of the City of Cambridge et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 76-1495-C. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 17, 1980. *595 Brian J. McMenimen, Boston, Mass., McSweeney, Snow, Sheehan & Perkins, Wayne A. Perkins, Somervill

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of International Trade denying a preliminary injunction against the liquidation of entries of merchandise covered by an antidumping order that the party seeking the injunction challenged in that court. The Court of International Trade held that the party’s failure to seek an annual administrative review of the antidumping order barred the party fr

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant, Edward C. Hussey, appeals the district court’s ruling 498 F.Supp. 594, that his civil rights action based on 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) was barred by the six months limitation mandated by Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 31, § 42, which it found to be the state law “most analogous” to appellant’s claim. We

916 F.2d 1578 12 ITRD 1950 CAMBRIDGE LEE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,andAmerican Brass, Chase Brass & Copper Company, Hussey Copper,Ltd., The Miller Company, Olin Corporation-Brass Group,Revere Copper Products, Inc., International Association ofMachinists & Aerospace Workers, International Union, AlliedIndustrial Workers of America

772 F.Supp. 42 (1991) Gail W. TRASK, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel G. Trask v. COUNTY OF STRAFFORD, et al. Civ. No. 89-083-S. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. August 22, 1991. Leslie H. Johnson, Concord, N.H., for plaintiff. Bartram C. Branch, Manchester, N.H., for defendants. ORDER STAHL, Di

DOYLE, Judge. Before us is the appeal of Willie J. Cook from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review dismissing Cook’s petition for unemployment compensation benefits. Cook worked for the Hussey Copper Corporation (Employer) as a stone mason until his separation from employment on April 8, 1992. Cook filed for unemployment compensation benefits at the Office of Employment Security (OES)

Pierce, J. This is an action brought by the town of Plymouth against the town of Kingston to recover for support furnished one Arthur Devine from May 21, 1932, to September 22, 1933, including interest. The answer is a general denial. "The sole issue ... is whether Devine was settled in Kingston from April 22, 1932, to September 22, 1933, it being agreed by the parties that he was settled in Kingston until April 22, 1932.” The tria

450 F.Supp. 736 (1977) Peter E. DeLUCA, Plaintiff, v. James Leo SULLIVAN et al., Defendants. Edward C. HUSSEY, Plaintiff, v. James Leo SULLIVAN et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 76-172-C, 76-1495-C. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 28, 1977. *737 *738 Wayne A. Pe

Filed 12/26/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, H048598 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. F1660022) v. DANA WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Defendant and Appellant. Defendant Da

Filed 3/22/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIGNA REYES et al., F080827 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Kern Super. Ct. v. No. BCV-17-100082) BENE

682 F.Supp.2d 60 (2010) Anna M. LITIF, individually and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis R. Litif Luanne Litif, & Lee Litif, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, John Morris, & John Connolly, Defendants. John E. Davis and Robert P. Davis, in their capacities as Administrators of the Estate of Debra Davis, Plaintiffs, v. United States, John Morris, & John Connolly, Defendants. Marion Hussey, individuall

Gillerman, J. The defendant, Alton Clarke, was charged with three counts of aggravated rape pursuant to G. L. c. 265, § 22(a), one count of assault by means of a dangerous weapon pursuant to G. L. c. 265, § 15B(b), and one count of kidnapping pursuant to G. L. c. 265, § 26. Clarke’s first jury trial in January, 1997, resulted in a mistrial. After a second jury trial in August, 1997, Clarke was convicted on two counts of aggravat

295 F.Supp.2d 957 (2003) Eli FRIEDMAN, Individually and on behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. RAYOVAC CORPORATION, Thomas H. Lee Partners, Kenneth V. Biller, Kent J. Hussey, David A. Jones, Scott A. Schoen, Stephen P. Shanesy, Thomas R. Shepherd, Randall J. Steward, Warren C. Smith, Jr. and Merrell M. Tomlin,[1] Defendants. Nos. 02-C-0308-C, 02-C-325-C, 02-C-370-C. Unite

44 Wn. App. 898 (1986) 723 P.2d 438 MICHIGAN NATIONAL BANK, Respondent, v. ANNIKKI OLSON, Individually and as Personal Representative, Appellant. Nos. 6830-7-III; 7181-2-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. April 8, 1986. Donald L. Logerwell, Scott G. Warner, David Lieberworth, and Logerwell, Farley & Schoonm

447 F.Supp.2d 54 (2006) Emily McINTYRE and Christopher McIntyre as co-administrators of the Estate of John L. McIntyre, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-CV-10408-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 5, 2006. *55 *56

336 F.Supp.2d 87 (2004) Emily MCINTYRE and Christopher McIntyre as co-administrators of the Estate of John L. McIntyre, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-CV-10408-RC. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 30, 2004. *88 *89

HOLLANDER, Judge. The common issue presented here concerns the determination of when appellees, who are 33 former Westinghouse Electric Corporation employees, became unemployed for purposes of entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits.1 The Hearing Examiner of the Department of Economic and Employment Development (“DEED”) concluded that all 33 *28<

397 Mass. 351 (1986) 491 N.E.2d 607 COMMONWEALTH vs. ROBERT HARVEY. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. February 4, 1986. April 17, 1986. Present: WILKINS, LIACOS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. *352 Daniel J. O'Connell, III (Eileen D. Vodoklys with him) for the defe

370 F.Supp. 247 (1973) Ernest E. BURGESS et al., Plaintiffs, v. M/V TAMANO et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Third-Party Defendants. Mark SNOW et al., Plaintiffs, v. M/V TAMANO et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Third-Party Defendants. Calvin E. DOUGHTY, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. M/V TAMANO et al., Defendants