⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

1 opinion for “Hutcheson v. Chilson”

Arizona Supreme Court · 1949-10-24 · Published · cited 29× · 210 P.2d 967; 69 Ariz. 138; 1949 Ariz. LEXIS 99
Petitioner Jose Madrigal seeks annulment of an award made by the respondent commission disallowing his claim for compensation under its policy of insurance issued to the A.B.C. Produce Company, respondent employer. The lawfulness of the commission's action in reforming its policy of insurance excluding petitioner from coverage after he had suffered an injury is the decisive question presented. There is no material conflict in the evidence. Petitioner was employed by the produce company