Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “I Homer Sutton”
Homer C. Tomerlin, III v. Statepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 9, 2018 No. 04-18-00081-CR Homer C. TOMERLIN, III, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Homer C. Tomberlin, III v. Statepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 9, 2018 No. 04-18-00082-CR Homer C. TOMBERLIN, III, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 452 Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS integrity of this document DIVISION I 2023.07.19 10:55:41 -05'00' No. CV-20-442 2023.003.20244 JAMES WILLIS SUTTON, JR.; OPINION DELIVERED NOVEMBER 17, 2021 HOMER WILLIS; AND LOUIS WILLIS, EACH IN HIS OWN APPEAL FROM THE SEVIER RESPECTI
Richardson v. Commissionerpublic domain
509 F.3d 736 (2007) Homer L. RICHARDSON and Gloria M. Richardson, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 06-1963. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 22, 2007. Decided and Filed: December 11, 2007. *737 *738 ARGUED: Robert
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00405-CV The Daneshjou Company, Inc., Appellant v.
United States v. Azat Martirossianpublic domain
SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Federal courts do not play "catch me if you can." If a defendant refuses to show up to answer an indictment, ignores an arrest warrant, or leaves the jurisdiction, the court may decline to resolve any objections to the indictment in his absence. What is known loosely as the fugitive disentitlement doctrine generally permits a federal court to insist on a defendant
Richard Adler v. Elk Glenn, LLCpublic domain
SUTTON, Circuit Judge, concurring. When a district court enters a final judgment under Civil Rule 54(b), must it explain its reasons for doing so? Our cases suggest that it must, compelling the dismissal of this appeal. I doubt, however, whether our decisions in this area have got it right. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, the principal federal law governing appellate jurisdiction, a court of appea
Sutton v. Industrial Commission of Utahpublic domain
9 Utah 2d 339 (1959) 344 P.2d 538 HARRY SUTTON AND F.W. BLACK, DBA EAGER BEAVER ROOFING CO., PLAINTIFFS, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH AND CURTIS OWEN RUPP, DEFENDANTS. No. 9033. Supreme Court of Utah. October 6, 1959. Andrew John Brennan, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs. Walter L. Budge, Atty. Gen., Homer F. Wilkinson, Asst. Atty. G
Baker v. Tenn. Gas Pipeline Co.public domain
COX, J. Appellant, Southern Natural Gas Company ("Southern"), appeals a judgment from the Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union, State of Louisiana, wherein the trial court rendered a judgment in favor of Appellee, Mary T. Baker ("Baker"), granting the Clerk of Court's motion to impose court costs in the amount of $49,516.28, and an additional $6,000 in attorney fees. Southern prays that the district court's ruling be rev
OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. The Clean Air Act enlists the States and the United States to improve visibility in the nation’s federal parks and wilderness areas, among other goals. Part of this effort requires factories to add new pollution-limiting technology. One factory faced with this requirement is St. Marys Cement. (More on why St. Mary
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge, dissenting. The Court’s ruling today goes too far in subordinating the constitutional rights of employees to the convenience of employers. The “agreement” between Seawright and AGF — which was not signed, con*980tained a unilateral working-as-acceptance provision, and constituted a total waiver of the right to acce
United States v. Williamspublic domain
612 F.3d 417 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernell D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2070. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 8, 2010. Decided and Filed: July 8, 2010. *419 ARGUED: Michael D. Oppenheimer, Erickson & Oppenheimer, Chicago, Illinois, for
Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffmann-Laroche, Ltd.public domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge. The appellants, foreign corporations that purchased vitamin products outside of the United States for distribution in foreign countries from the appellee foreign manufacturers, brought this action asserting, inter alia, price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l.1 The district court dismissed the Sherman Act claim for lack of sub
United States v. Waseem Alampublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0171p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffmann-Laroche, Ltd.public domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge. The appellants, foreign corporations that purchased vitamin products outside of the United States for distribution in foreign countries from the appellee foreign manufacturers, brought this action asserting, inter alia, price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l.
Mitchell v. Senkowskipublic domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER1 LAWRENCE E. KHAN, District Judge. I. Background On April 19, 2001, Plaintiff Paul Mitchell (“Mitchell”) filed a civil rights action under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code against employees and officers of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”). Complaint (Dkt. No. 1). On Februa
Lloyd Ward v. Robert Yaquintopublic domain
Case: 18-10469 Document: 00515613722 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-10469 FILED
Wachter v. Wachterpublic domain
607 S.E.2d 818 (2004) 216 W.Va. 489 Gary D. WACHTER, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. Sylvia L. WACHTER, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 31598. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 15, 2004. Decided November 12, 2004. *820 Christopher D. Janelle, Frank M. Aliveto, S
Patricia Townsend v. Walla Walla School Districtpublic domain
Brown, J. ¶1 Patricia Townsend appeals the summary dismissal of her hearing disability, retaliation, and constructive discharge claims against the Walla Walla School District (District). Because we agree no material fact issues remain and Ms. Townsend has failed to establish her claims as a matter of law, we affirm. PACTS ¶2 The District hired Ms. Townsend as a part-time assistant cook at W
Gonzales v. Colvinpublic domain
ORDER John E. 'Jones III, United States District Judge AND NOW, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn (Doc. 24), recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs social security disability insurance be vacated and the case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security to develop the record fully, co