⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “I Homer Sutton”

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2018-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 9, 2018 No. 04-18-00081-CR Homer C. TOMERLIN, III, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2018-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 9, 2018 No. 04-18-00082-CR Homer C. TOMBERLIN, III, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021-11-17 · Published · cited 6× · 2021 Ark. App. 452
Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 452 Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS integrity of this document DIVISION I 2023.07.19 10:55:41 -05'00' No. CV-20-442 2023.003.20244 JAMES WILLIS SUTTON, JR.; OPINION DELIVERED NOVEMBER 17, 2021 HOMER WILLIS; AND LOUIS WILLIS, EACH IN HIS OWN APPEAL FROM THE SEVIER RESPECTI
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007-12-11 · Published · cited 56× · 509 F.3d 736; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28556; 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6970; 2007 WL 4302407
509 F.3d 736 (2007) Homer L. RICHARDSON and Gloria M. Richardson, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 06-1963. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 22, 2007. Decided and Filed: December 11, 2007. *737 *738 ARGUED: Robert
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2008-10-16 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00405-CV The Daneshjou Company, Inc., Appellant v.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 12× · 917 F.3d 883
SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Federal courts do not play "catch me if you can." If a defendant refuses to show up to answer an indictment, ignores an arrest warrant, or leaves the jurisdiction, the court may decline to resolve any objections to the indictment in his absence. What is known loosely as the fugitive disentitlement doctrine generally permits a federal court to insist on a defendant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-07-10 · Published · cited 15× · 758 F.3d 737; 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1318; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13044; 2014 WL 3360849
SUTTON, Circuit Judge, concurring. When a district court enters a final judgment under Civil Rule 54(b), must it explain its reasons for doing so? Our cases suggest that it must, compelling the dismissal of this appeal. I doubt, however, whether our decisions in this area have got it right. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, the principal federal law governing appellate jurisdiction, a court of appea
Utah Supreme Court · 1959-10-06 · Published · cited 10× · 344 P.2d 538; 9 Utah 2d 339; 1959 Utah LEXIS 242
9 Utah 2d 339 (1959) 344 P.2d 538 HARRY SUTTON AND F.W. BLACK, DBA EAGER BEAVER ROOFING CO., PLAINTIFFS, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH AND CURTIS OWEN RUPP, DEFENDANTS. No. 9033. Supreme Court of Utah. October 6, 1959. Andrew John Brennan, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs. Walter L. Budge, Atty. Gen., Homer F. Wilkinson, Asst. Atty. G
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 245 So. 3d 1079
COX, J. Appellant, Southern Natural Gas Company ("Southern"), appeals a judgment from the Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union, State of Louisiana, wherein the trial court rendered a judgment in favor of Appellee, Mary T. Baker ("Baker"), granting the Clerk of Court's motion to impose court costs in the amount of $49,516.28, and an additional $6,000 in attorney fees. Southern prays that the district court's ruling be rev
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015-03-24 · Published · cited 10× · 782 F.3d 280; 2015 FED App. 0054P; 45 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20059; 80 ERC (BNA) 1157; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4759
OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. The Clean Air Act enlists the States and the United States to improve visibility in the nation’s federal parks and wilderness areas, among other goals. Part of this effort requires factories to add new pollution-limiting technology. One factory faced with this requirement is St. Marys Cement. (More on why St. Mary
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007-11-13 · Published · cited 133× · 507 F.3d 967; 12 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1825; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26328; 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,017; 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1818; 2007 WL 3341692
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge, dissenting. The Court’s ruling today goes too far in subordinating the constitutional rights of employees to the convenience of employers. The “agreement” between Seawright and AGF — which was not signed, con*980tained a unilateral working-as-acceptance provision, and constituted a total waiver of the right to acce
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-07-08 · Published · cited 28× · 612 F.3d 417; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13885; 2010 WL 2680185
612 F.3d 417 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernell D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2070. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 8, 2010. Decided and Filed: July 8, 2010. *419 ARGUED: Michael D. Oppenheimer, Erickson & Oppenheimer, Chicago, Illinois, for
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 417 F.3d 1267
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge. The appellants, foreign corporations that purchased vitamin products outside of the United States for distribution in foreign countries from the appellee foreign manufacturers, brought this action asserting, inter alia, price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l.1 The district court dismissed the Sherman Act claim for lack of sub
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-06-02 · Published · cited 78× · 960 F.3d 831
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0171p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005-06-28 · Published · cited 30× · 388 F.3d 337; 368 U.S. App. D.C. 18; 417 F.3d 1267; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12743; 2005 WL 1512951
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge. The appellants, foreign corporations that purchased vitamin products outside of the United States for distribution in foreign countries from the appellee foreign manufacturers, brought this action asserting, inter alia, price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l.
District Court, N.D. New York · 2007-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 246 F.R.D. 419; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85978; 2007 WL 4127624
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER1 LAWRENCE E. KHAN, District Judge. I. Background On April 19, 2001, Plaintiff Paul Mitchell (“Mitchell”) filed a civil rights action under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code against employees and officers of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”). Complaint (Dkt. No. 1). On Februa
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 18-10469 Document: 00515613722 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-10469 FILED
Wachter v. Wachterpublic domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2004-11-12 · Published · cited 3× · 607 S.E.2d 818; 216 W. Va. 489; 2004 W. Va. LEXIS 150
607 S.E.2d 818 (2004) 216 W.Va. 489 Gary D. WACHTER, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. Sylvia L. WACHTER, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 31598. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 15, 2004. Decided November 12, 2004. *820 Christopher D. Janelle, Frank M. Aliveto, S
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008-12-02 · Published · cited 8× · 147 Wash. App. 620
Brown, J. ¶1 Patricia Townsend appeals the summary dismissal of her hearing disability, retaliation, and constructive discharge claims against the Walla Walla School District (District). Because we agree no material fact issues remain and Ms. Townsend has failed to establish her claims as a matter of law, we affirm. PACTS ¶2 The District hired Ms. Townsend as a part-time assistant cook at W
Gonzales v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-02-17 · Published · cited 14× · 191 F. Supp. 3d 401; 2015 WL 3465751; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73715
ORDER John E. 'Jones III, United States District Judge AND NOW, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn (Doc. 24), recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs social security disability insurance be vacated and the case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security to develop the record fully, co