Cases

758 F.Supp.2d 428 (2010) In re BP, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION. Case No. 10-md-2185. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. December 28, 2010. *430 Jordanna G. Thigpen, Aron K. Liang, Joseph W. Cotchett, Mark C. Molumphy, Matthew K. Edling, Nancy L. Fineman, Cotchett Pitre and Carthy, Burlingame, CA, Richard Warren Mit

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. On April 20, 2010, the Macondo well blew out, costing the lives of eleven rig workers, and setting off a chain of events that eventually sank the Deepwater Horizon rig operated by Defendant BP pic. The blowout spilled over four million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. In the months that followed, lawsuits raising a variety of claims, i

625 F.Supp.2d 1143 (2009) In re QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action Nos. 01-cv-1451-REB-KLM, 01-cv-1472-REB-KLM, 01-cv-1527-REB-KLM, 01-cv-1616-REB-KLM, 01-cv-1799-REB-KLM, 01-cv-1930-REB-KLM, 01-cv-2083-REB-KLM, 02-cv-0333-REB-KLM, 02-cv-0374-REB-KLM, 02-cv-0507-REB-KLM, 02-cv-0658-REB-KLM, 02-cv-755-REB-KLM, 02-cv-798-REB-KLM, 04-cv-0238-REB-KLM. United States Distric

OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. This is a consolidated appeal by four objectors to an award of attorneys’ fees in the settlement of a securities fraud class action. The District Court approved the settlement agreement, including the attorneys’ fees provisions. We will affirm. I. On October 27,

387 F.Supp.2d 1130 (2005) In re QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This order applies to Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Qwest, et al, Case No. 04-cv-00238-REB-CBS No. CIV.01-CV01451REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01616REBCBS, CIV.A01CV02083REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01472REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01799REBCBS, CIV.A02CV00333REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01527REBCBS, CIV.A01CV01930REBCBS, CIV.A02CV00658REBCBS, CIV.A02CV00755REBCBS, CIV.A02CV

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 24-1818 ________________ IN RE: WALMART INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION KIM KENGLE AND ROSEANNE LACY, Appellants _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. Ci

Supreme Court No. 2023-115-Appeal. (PC 19-5658) No. 2023-143-Appeal. (PC 19-6685) In re CVS Health Corporation : Securities Litigation. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporte

22-943 In re Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: October 3, 2023 Decided: February 1, 2024 No. 22-943 _____

03/18/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 2, 2021 Session IN RE SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-1169-IV Russell T. Perkins, Chancellor ___________________________________

621 F.Supp.2d 131 (2009) In re SEPTEMBER 11 LITIGATION. Nos. 21 MC 101(AKH), 07 Civ. 7051(AKH), 08 Civ. 10646(AKH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 16, 2009. *135 Derek Todd Smith, Zafer Adem Akin, Akin & Smith, LLC, for World Trade Farmers Market, Inc., Adem Arici, Omer Ipek. Douglas J. Pepe, Gregory P. Jose

20-1352 In re: Synchrony Financial Securities Litigation 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2020 6 7 (Argued: November 12, 2020 Decided: February 16, 2021) 8 9 Docket No. 20-1352 10 ____________________ 11 12 IN

586 F.Supp.2d 732 (2008) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446. Civ.A. No. H-01-3624. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 8, 2008. *735 Richard J. Zook, Cunningham Darlow e

*1110ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT William Alsup, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION In this securities action, defendants move to dismiss in three separate motions. For the reasons stated below, the motions are Granted in part and Denied in part. STATEMENT

*456OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: This is a consolidated securities action purportedly brought on behalf of a class of all purchasers of U.S. exchange-traded securities of Centráis Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. (“Eletrobras” or the “Company”) between August 17, 2010 and June 24, 2015 (the “class period”). The lead plaintiffs, the City

455 F.3d 160 In re AT & T CORPORATION, Securities Litigation.Marion Washburn and William A. Hoffmann, III, Class Members and Objectors, Appellants at No. 05-2727.Jacquelynn D. Frame and Donald J. Frame, Class Members and Objectors, Appellants at No. 05-2728. No. 05-2727. No. 05-2728. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from claims that major telecommunications carriers assisted the government with intelligence gathering following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. News reports that the National Security Agency (“NSA”) undertook a warrantless eavesdropping program with alleged cooperation by telecommunications companies spawned dozens of lawsuits

*357OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Lead Plaintiff Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. (“USS”) brings this putative class action against Brazilian oil company Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.-Petrobras (“Petro-bras”); two of Petrobras’ wholly-owned subsidiaries, Petrobras Global Finance, B.V. (“PGF”)1 and Petrobras Ame

*372 OPINION JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. •• Lead Plaintiff Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. (“USS”) brings this putative class' action against the Brazilian state-owned oil company Petróleo Brasilei-ro S.A. — Petrobras (“Petrobras” or the “Company”); two of ■ Petrobras’ wholly-owned subsidiaries, Petrobras Global Finance, B.Y.

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM ORDER . JED S. RAKOFF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Plaintiffs bring the above-captioned individual but related actions against defendant Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. — Petrobras (“Petrobras”) and related defendants, including Petrobras’ independent auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Inde-pendentes (“PwC”). Plaintiffs allege that Petrobras was at the center of a multi-year, multi-bi