Cases

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Reinke Insulation Co. and K. Reinke, Jr. & Co. (which we will treat, for purposes of this opinion, as one entity called “Reinke”) have been in a longstanding dispute with a local Union (“Union”) and the Chicago District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund (“Fund”). This litigation had its inception when the Fund sued Reinke alleging a deficiency in pensi

464 F.3d 651 CHICAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs,v.REINKE INSULATION COMPANY and K. Reinke, Jr. & Company, Defendants-Appellants,v.Chicago and Northeast Illinois District Council of Carpenters and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 1307, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-3555. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circ

171 F.3d 912 1999-1 Trade Cases P 72,479, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 9672,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1141 STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 420 WELFARE FUND;International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades,District Council No. 21 Welfare Fund; InternationalBrotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 98,Health & Welfare Fund; Composition Roofers Union Local 30Combined Health & Welfare

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

*640OPINION AND ORDER VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge The Complaint in these consolidated cases, which involve the alleged manipulation and suppression of gold prices during the period from January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2013 (the “Class Period”), sug*641gests that in the era of s

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 27, 2013 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

825 N.E.2d 1 (2005) Matthew E. BURGESS, William M. Burgess, Ronald R. Clark, Yves Dambreville, Michael Escue, Brett M. Flynn, Ronald L. Hamilton, Sr., James L. Loussaint, Christine M. Patterson, Rahman Sharief and Troy M. Whittaker, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. E.L.C. ELECTRIC, INC., Appellee-Defendant. No. 49A02-0406-CV-504. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 22, 2005. <

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ERIC DOUGLAS GUILBEAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. 2024-0968-JTL FOOTPRINT INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO, INC., CLEVELAND AVENUE, LLC, FOOTPRINT CA LLC, CA OPPORTUNITY FUND I LLC, CLEVELAND MANOR INVESTMENTS II LLC, CA FOOD I FUND LLC, OLYMPUS GROWTH FUND VII, L.P., OLYMPUS GROWTH FUND VII PARALLEL, L.P., MOVENDO CAPITAL, B.V., ZENCAP HOLDINGS FP, LLC, DON THOMPSON, MANU BETTEGOWDA,

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

878 F.Supp. 1224 (1995) CURTIS 1000, INC., Plaintiff, v. Daniel YOUNGBLADE, Defendant. No. C 94-4117. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. January 27, 1995. *1225 *1226 *1227 *1228

N0. 01-14-01004-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS FIRST COURT OF APPEAL HOUSTON, TEXAS AT HOUSTON 10/22/2015 4:44:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________ Clerk Kevin CAMPBELL,

471 F.Supp. 670 (1979) VANGUARD JUSTICE SOCIETY, INC., et al. v. Harry HUGHES et al. Barbara A. GUMPMAN et al. v. Harry HUGHES et al. Guy V. BOSWORTH et al. v. Harry HUGHES et al. Civ. Nos. 73-1105-K, 73-1106-K and K-74-71. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 20, 1979. *671

123 F.Supp.2d 245 (2000) CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, Plaintiff, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 99-2518 JBS. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 5, 2000. *246 *247 Lisa J. Rodriguez, Kenneth I. Trujillo, Ira Neill Richards, Louis C. Ric

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. Table of Contents I. Legal Background.561 II. ILEC Objections. A. Unbundling of Mass Market Switches 1. Subdelegation of § 251(d)(2) impairment determinations to state commissions . 2. Impairment in provision of mass market switching. 3. The Commission’s definition o

292 F.Supp. 413 (1968) Anderson L. DOBBINS, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 212, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America by Ramsey CLARK, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 212, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 6421, 6473. United States District Court S. D. Ohio, W. D. September 12,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-1905 JEWEL SANITARY NAPKINS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSY BEAVER PUBLICATIONS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court

LAMOUTTE, Bankruptcy Judge. Charles Raso (“Raso”) appeals from a bankruptcy court order granting summary judgment in favor of the debtor, James M. Fahey, Jr. (“Fahey”), on Count II of Raso’s § 523(a)(4)1 complaint seeking a determination that certain unpaid contributions to multiple employee benefit plans were nondischargeable. The bankruptcy court found that Raso failed to establish that Fahey act

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge In 2014, Brazil found itself embroiled in what has become a widely publicized scandal. Brazilian authorities launched an investigation (Operation "Lava Jato" or "Car Wash") into a sprawling bribery and kickback scheme. Construction and engineering conglomerates were accused of bribing government officials in order to secure lucrative contracts. Not initially implicated in the scandal, D

639 F.3d 841 (2011) Marlin O. OSTHUS, Regional Director of the Eighteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board; National Labor Relations Board, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WHITESELL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3209. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 13, 2010. Filed: April 22, 2011.