⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “ITT Educational Services, Inc. and ESI Service Corp.”

District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-05-04 · Published · cited 8× · 859 F. Supp. 2d 572; 2012 WL 1632762; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65754
*574 DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) (Docket No. 43) Plaintiffs Corrected Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint” or “Compl.”) (Docket No. 36) filed by defendants Kevin M. Modany (“Modany”), Daniel M. Fitzpatrick (“Fitzpatrick,” with Moda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-01-24 · Published · cited 28× · 513 F.3d 1085; 69 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1356; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1317; 2008 WL 191672
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS. ORDER AND SUPERSEDING OPINION ORDER The petitions for panel rehearing are GRANTED. The opinion and dissent filed on December 27, 2006, are withdrawn. The superseding opinion and dissenting opinion of Judge Thomas will be filed concurrently with this order. The peti
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-08-03 · Published · cited 7× · 122 F. Supp. 3d 1114; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109981; 2015 WL 4988635
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. ' THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Finding Exceptional Case Under 85 U.S.C. § 285 and Award of Attorneys’ Fees, filed June 22, 2012 (Doc. 202)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on March 6, 2013. The primary issue is whether Defendant Levi-tón Manufácturing Co. should
District Court, D. Maryland · 2004-09-29 · Published · cited 17× · 340 F. Supp. 2d 603; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19548; 2004 WL 2203411
340 F.Supp.2d 603 (2004) Daniel G. WAGNER, Jr., et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland, et al. Nos. CIV.A.DKC 2002-0763, CIV.A.2003-0255. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 29, 2004. *605 Kerry Lynn Edwards, Attorney At Law, Arlington, VA, Sharon Krevor Weisbaum, Brown Goldstein and Levy LLP
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00799-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/20/2015 4:09:18 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00474-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/28/2015 4:51:49 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM