⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

14 opinions for “IVAN ROBLES MELENDEZ”

District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-07-31 · Published · cited 8× · 267 F. Supp. 3d 369
OPINION AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Plaintiff Luz Pizarro-Correa (“Pizarro”) brought this action against the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Department; also known as Departamento de Hacienda (“Hacienda”), the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“Commonwealth”), and Alberto Cardona-Crespo (“Cardona”) (collectively “defendants”) alleging violations of the Americans with Disabiliti
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015-08-31 · Published · cited 1× · 124 F. Supp. 3d 57; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116970; 2015 WL 5092866
*62 OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, District Judge. The above-captioned case arises from the damages Emmanuel Fernández Jorge (“Fernández”) and Carmen Lidia Jorge (“Lidia”) (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) allegedly suffered as a result -of Fernández being shot by a member of the Puerto Rico Police Department (“PRPD”) following
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006-02-06 · Published · cited 71× · 438 F.3d 1; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2830; 2006 WL 268776
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This is the latest in a series of cases which involve the tension between a newly elected administration’s ability to reorganize government, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, two constitutional limitations — the First Amendment’s prohibitions against discriminating against government *6
United States District Court · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 11× · 318 F. Supp. 3d 461
DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are twelve (1) Motions to Dismiss and one (1) separate Motion to Joinder: (1) Defendant Banco Popular's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket No. 96); (2) Defendant Scotiabank's Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 99); (3) Firstbank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 103); (4) Motion to Dismiss F
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998-11-17 · Published · cited 88× · 160 F.3d 768; 50 Fed. R. Serv. 929; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 29546; 1998 WL 788772
SELYA, Circuit Judge. In the wake of his conviction on a charge of conspiracy to possess controlled substances with intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1994), defendant-appellant Luis Marrero-Ortiz (Marrero), one of thirty-one defendants named in a wide-ranging indictment, claims that the district court committed a host of errors. We have r
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-06-07 · Published · cited 105× · 650 F.3d 350; 2011 WL 2207110
650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998-11-17 · Published · cited 0×
USCA1 Opinion
People v. Thomkinspublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2020-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/1/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A141375 v. CLEM THOMPKINS et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No
People v. Thompkinspublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2020-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/17/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, A141375 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 168583A/B) v. CLEM THOMPKINS et
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 314× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under