Cases

GRATTON, Judge. The State of Idaho appeals from the district court’s order granting Brian Ellis Neal’s motion to suppress. We affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On April 24, 2014, at 12:30 a.m., Neal was stopped for failing to signal when merging, failing to signal a lane change, and for window

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MUD MUCKERS, LLC, Appellant, Case No. 5D21-1758 v. LT Case No. 2018-CA-000484 GEORGE E. ALLEN, III, J

RANDALL, Circuit Judge: In this diversity tort suit, the court below held that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Although the ultimate application of the appropriate statute of limitations is a comparatively simple business, the intermediate inquiry of which state’s statute of limitations should be applied leads us on a merry chase through the murky area in which the Erie d

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0205 ══════════ Huffman Asset Management, LLC and Prairie Capital, LLC, Petitioners, v. Maurice Colter and Ni-Ida Colter, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for

646 F.2d 1099 Jeff ELLIS, Administrator of the Estate of Ida B. Ellis,Deceased, Plaintiff- Appellant,v.GREAT SOUTHWESTERN CORPORATION, Six Flags, Inc. and SixFlags Over Texas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-1920 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Unit A June 5, 1981.

Order PER CURIAM: Larry and Ida Brotherton, husband and wife, sued Charles Leffler in the Circuit Court of Livingston County, seeking specific performance of their contractual right to repurchase farm property in Chillicothe which the Brothertons had previously sold to Leffler. After a bench trial, the circuit court denied specific performance. The Brothertons appeal. We affirm. Because a published opinio

DAISY ELLIS, LINDSEY * NO. 2024-CA-0721 DUBOSE, AND SAMANTHA MAZA * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD M. IRELAND, JR * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL

SUBSTITUTE OPINION THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED MARCH 3, 1995, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN LANSING, Judge. This is an attorney malpractice case. At issue is the propriety of the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant on the ground that the applicable statute of limitation, I.C. § 5-219(4), had expired prior to commencement of the action. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND</

McQUADE, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission of the State of Idaho which denied the claim of Irvin E. Ellis, claimant-appellant (hereinafter claimant) for a 33J>$% permanent partial disability rating growing out of an alleged impairment to his liver which he claimed was a result of serum hepatitis incurred while surgery was performed to correct an employment related injury. We affir

HORTON, Justice. Patricia McKay appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Thomas Walker and Cosho Humphrey, LLP, in a legal malpractice action. McKay contended that Walker negligently drafted a property settlement agreement by failing to include provisions that would have resulted in a judgment lien against payments owed to her husband which were secured by a mortgage. T

WALTERS, Chief Judge. This appeal is taken from a district court decision upholding a magistrate’s order denying the husband’s motion to set aside a *470default judgment in a divorce action. The issues we address are: first, whether the trial court violated the requirements of I.R. C.P. 55(b)(2) when it made an award which allegedly was contrary to Idaho’s community p

178 P.3d 597 (2008) Timothy S. HEINZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles B. BAUER, Defendant-Respondent. No. 33579. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2007 Term. January 25, 2008. Rehearing Denied March 14, 2008. *599 Ellis, Brown, & Sheils, Boise, for appellant. Allen Ellis argued. Moffatt, Thomas,

W. JONES, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority Opinion. It is my opinion that there is no coverage under the commercial general liability policy issued by Employers Mutual Casualty Company (“EMC”) to Rimar Construction, Inc. (“RCI”) for the costs and attorney’s fees awarded to the Donnellys *509

19 B.R. 421 (1982) In the Matter of B & W ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. In the Matter of SHOEMAKER TRUCKING CO., INC., Debtor. B & W ENTERPRISES, INC. and Shoemaker Trucking Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, and Loren Wetzel, Trustee, Substituted Plaintiff, v. GOODMAN OIL COMPANY; Interstate Mack; Trebar, Inc., (formerly known as Boise Kenworth Sales, Inc.); Mountain Bell Telephone, Inc.; Usatab; Cummins Intermountain Idaho; Bowen O

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

358 P.2d 396 (1961) Edward B. ELLIS, Claimant-Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AGENCY, Defendant-Respondent. No. 8873. Supreme Court of Idaho. January 3, 1961. E. J. Aschenbrener, Nampa, for appellant. Frank L. Benson, Atty. Gen., Jedd Owens, Asst. Atty. Gen., John Gunn, Legal Counsel for Employment Security Agency, Boise, for respondent. McQUADE, Jus

Argued September 27, 1933. An operation at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, on February 25, 1925, for the removal of a cancerous growth from the back of the head of J.P. Ellis, an employe of Jones and Laughlin Steel Company of Pittsburgh, resulted in his death. His widow, Ida B. Ellis, averring that her husband's death was attributable to an accidental injury, suffered in the course of his employment during the night of December 16, 1924, filed, in behalf of herself and their young son, a c

137 P.3d 417 (2006) 143 Idaho 30 Leanne CHEUNG, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Raymundo PENA, Respondent-Appellant. No. 31371. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2006 Term. May 3, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 29, 2006. *418 Gardner & Camacho Mendoza, LLP, Boise, for appellant. Natalie C.

153 P.3d 1158 (2007) SPUR PRODUCTS CORPORATION, an Idaho corporation; Eagle Data Works, Inc., an Idaho corporation; and Talon Enterprises, Inc., an Idaho corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STOEL RIVES LLP, a limited liability partnership, Defendant-Respondent. No. 33054. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2006 Term. February 5, 2007. Rehearing Denied M