Cases

ACCEPTED 01-15-00266-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/15/2015 11:43:07 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

USCA11 Case: 22-12675 Document: 61-1 Date Filed: 04/18/2025 Page: 1 of 52 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12675 ____________________ KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P

*1296ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, FOR NEW TRIAL, AND FOR REMITTITUR WM. TERRELL HODGES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This diversity jurisdiction Florida common law negligence action was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict awarding damages to the Plaintiff. The case is now before the Court on Defendant Ste

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 NO. CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH

OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Componex Corporation alleges that defendant Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (“EFI”), infringes two of its patents for printing technology. The court has already addressed Componex’s infringement claims on summary judgment with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,685,076 (“the '076 patent”). (Dkt. # 152.) This opinion addresses Componex’s cla

903 N.E.2d 969 (2009) GRADEX, INC., Appellant-Defendant, v. Patrick ARBUCKLE, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 93A02-0811-EX-1043. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 5, 2009. Publication Ordered March 31, 2009. *970 Cameron L. Christoph, David A. Mack, Kopka, Pinkus, Dolin & Eads, Crown Point, IN, Attorneys for Appell

512 F.3d 1057 (2008) John PRITCHETT, Roxie Pritchett, Appellants, v. COTTRELL, INC.; Jack Cooper Transport Company, Inc., Appellees. Christian Scott, Cathy Scott, Appellants, v. Cottrell, Inc.; Jack. Cooper Transport. Company, Inc., Appellees. Gaylan Fix, Carman Fix, Appellants, v. Cottrell, Inc.; Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc., Appellees. Nos. 06-3459, 06-3477, 06-3665. United

681 F.Supp.2d 309 (2010) METSO MINERALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. POWERSCREEN INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION LIMITED, Terex Corporation, Powerscreen New York, Inc. and Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc., Defendants. No. 06-cv-1446 (ADS)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 28, 2010. *313 Cohen, Pontani, Leiberman &

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Kenneth Scott filed suit against individuals who participated in his involuntarily commitment to a mental institution, alleging a dizzying array of violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and related violations of state law. His appeal from the dismissal of those claims raises three important issues. We first reject the proposition that the state

520 So.2d 684 (1988) William A. JOHNSON, As Personal Representative of the Estate of William Garrett Johnson, Appellant, v. RINKER MATERIALS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee. No. 87-325. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 1, 1988. Floyd, Pearson, Richman, Greer, Weil, Zack & Brumbaugh and Herman J. Russomanno and Sally R. Doerner, M

Sn the Missouri Court of Appeals Castern District DIVISION TWO ROBERT L. JOHNSON, ) ) Respondent/Cross-Appellant, ) EDI101018 ) Vv. ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County AUTO HANDLING CORPORATION, ) 10SL-CCO1851-01 ) Cross-Respondent, ) Honorable Thomas J. Prebil ) and ) ) Filed: April 12, 2016 COTTRELL, INC., } ) Appellant/Cross-Respondent. ) Introduction This is a products liability case resulting in a partial verdict for the plaintiff, Robert Johnson (Johnson), against one o

738 F.Supp. 528 (1990) CLIPPER BELT LACER CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Court No. 85-08-01032. United States Court of International Trade. March 13, 1990. *529 *530 Edmund Maciorowski, P.C., Edmund Maciorowski, for plaintiff. Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Wash

722 F.Supp. 595 (1989) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED, Defendant. No. C-86-20406 RPA. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 13, 1989. *596 S. Leslie Misrock, Jonathan A. Marshall, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, James P. Kleinberg, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enerse

74 Md. App. 68 (1988) 536 A.2d 699 C & K LORD, INC. v. JOHN W. CARTER. No. 600 September Term, 1987. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 4, 1988. Michael J. Kopen (George J. Goldsborough, Jr. and Goldsborough & Tolley, on the brief) Easton, for appellant. Henry I. Greenberg (Toni S. Lifshotz on the brief) Baltimore,

736 S.W.2d 828 (1987) Reva U. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. GIFFORD-HILL & CO., INC. et al., Appellees. No. 10-85-025-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. July 30, 1987. Rehearing Denied August 20, 1987. *830 Michael A. Robertson, Robertson, Boyle, Golden & Arnold, P.C., Grand Prairie, and Tony D. Crabtree, Dalla

343 So.2d 754 (1977) The WILDA, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DEVALL DIESEL, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. 5832. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 4, 1977. *755 Scofield, Bergstedt & Gerard, Richard E. Gerard, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant. Kimball, McLeod & Dow by Ro

323 F.Supp. 115 (1971) Glen C. BULL, Jr., Plaintiff, v. LOGETRONICS, INC., and Richard N. Johnson, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 4196. United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. January 5, 1971. *116 *117 James R. Sharp, Arnold B. Christen, George H. Mitchell, Jr., Washington

MILLER, Judge. These appeals are from an action for declaratory judgment of patent invalidity by appellant-cross appellee Square Liner 360°, Inc. (“Square Liner”) and a counterclaim by appellees-cross appellants Finis Lavell Chi-sum (“Chisum”) and Chief Industries, Inc. (“Chief”) for infringement of patent No. 3,630,066 (“ ’066”)

Case: 24-20399 Document: 100-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-20399 FILED