⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406”

District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014-06-18 · Published · cited 1× · 26 F. Supp. 3d 1172; 2014 WL 2767360
MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge. This matter is before the court on various Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants. (Docs. # 107, 108, 110, 112-14, 116, 119, 121, 122, 125, and 135). On April 9, 2014, the court heard argument on certain aspects of the Motions to Dismiss with general application to Defendants and both categories of Plaintiffs. After careful review and with th
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 238 F. Supp. 3d 1313; 2017 WL 713579; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25370
*1316MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE • This matter is before the court on the following cross motions for partial summary judgment: (1) Defendants’ Amended and Restated Motion Based on the Filed Rate Doctrine for Summary Judgment on the Alabama Subscribers’ Damages Claims (Doc. # 733); and (2) Alabama Subscribe
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 8× · 225 F. Supp. 3d 1269; 2016 WL 7384839
*1277MEMORANDUM OPINION This document relates to both tracks R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1. Introduction This case is before the court on five Motions to Dismiss (e.g., Docs. #208, 210, 211, 212, 213, Case No. 2:12-cv-02169-RDP) that have been filed by nine of the thirty-eigh
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018-04-05 · Published · cited 5× · 308 F. Supp. 3d 1241
R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction As the Supreme Court has observed, "the 'central evil addressed by Sherman Act § 1' is the 'elimin[ation of] competition that would otherwise exist.' " Am. Needle, Inc. v. Nat'l Football League , 560 U.S. 183, 19
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012-12-12 · Published · cited 18× · 908 F. Supp. 2d 1373; 2012 WL 6554004; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177691
TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in the Northern District of Alabama GC Advertising action move to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of Alabama. This antitrust litigation concerns the licensing agreements between and among the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) and its
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-10-25 · Published · cited 6× · 85 F.4th 1070
USCA11 Case: 22-13051 Document: 228-1 Date Filed: 10/25/2023 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13051 ____________________ IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION M
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-04-05 · Published · cited 1× · 684 F. App'x 824
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, concurring specially: This case comes before us on appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The plaintiffs are three doctors who had previously been plaintiffs in class-action litigation (the “Shane and Lo
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ANTHEM-CIGNA ) Consolidated MERGER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2017-0114-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 9, 2020 Date Decided: August 31, 2020 William M. Lafferty, Kevin M. Coen, D. McKinley Measley, Zi-Xiang Shen, Thomas P. Will, Daniel T. Menken, MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNEL
District Court, E.D. New York · 2019-01-14 · Published · cited 9× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 324
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. In this set of consolidated antitrust actions (the "MP Actions"), the Merchant Plaintiffs (the "MPs")1 challenge under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 - 2, the contracts that they have entered into wi
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-04-21 · Published · cited 2× · 894 N.W.2d 454; 2017 WL 1417831; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 38
HECHT, Justice. Thirteen Iowa chiropractors filed this class-action lawsuit against Iowa’s largest health insurer alleging it conspired with nonparty competitors to fix prices, allocate *456 markets, and engage in other anticompeti-tive conduct in Iowa in violation of the Iowa Competition Law.
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0364 Filed April 21, 2017 Amended July 17, 2017 BRADLEY A. CHICOINE, DR. BRADLEY A. CHICOINE, D.C., P.C., MARK A. NILES, NILES CHIROPRACTIC, INC., ROD R. REBARCAK, and BEN WINECOFF, on Behalf of Themselves and Those Like Situated, Appellants, and STEVEN A. MUELLER, BRADLEY J. BROWN, MARK A. KRUSE, KEVIN D. MILLER, and LARRY E. PHIPPS, on Behalf of The
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024-02-15 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 21-14409 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 02/15/2024 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14409 ____________________ TAQUILA MONROE,
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-04-17 · Published · cited 3× · 309 F. Supp. 3d 1223
Jonathan Goodman, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Introduction In the classic novella Animal Farm , written by George Orwell (1903-1950) and first published in 1945, the pigs who control the Manor Farm famously amended "The Seven Commandments of Animalism" and changed the commandment that "all animals are equal" to proclaim that "all animals are equal but some animals are more equal
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-04-03 · Published · cited 0× · 248 F. Supp. 3d 641; 2017 WL 1230824; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50176
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, JUDGE. This is an antitrust action alleging a nationwide conspiracy amongst Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association and the administrators of several separately owned, *642locally operated Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans to deny insurance coverage for certain mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry devices produced by Pla
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-11-27 · Published · cited 8× · 87 F.4th 487
USCA11 Case: 21-14503 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 11/27/2023 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14503 ____________________ ROBERT PONZIO, ALEX ACUNA,
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995-06-15 · Published · cited 18× · 56 F.3d 1538; 35 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1065; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14681
56 F.3d 1538 64 USLW 2032, 35 U.S.P.Q.2d 1065 RITE-HITE CORPORATION, Acme Dock Specialists, Inc., AlliedEquipment Corp., Applied Handling, Inc., Anderson MaterialHandling Co., Block-Dickson, Inc., Robert Lund d/b/a HMHCompany, HOJ Engineering & Sales Co., Inc., JohnsonEquipment Co., Johnl & Associates, Inc., Keller EquipmentCo., Inc., Loading Dock Equipment, Inc., Metro DockSpecialists, I