Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. This case is brought on behalf of beneficiaries of the Lehman Brothers Savings Plan (the “Plan”), an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) that held stock of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”) and suffered a large loss when Lehman failed in the 2008 financial crisis. Plaintiffs initially sued Lehman’s former directors (the “Director Defendants”)<

505 F.Supp.2d 501 (2007) In re MOTOROLA SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 03 C 287. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 8, 2007. *502 *503 Deborah R. Gross, Christopher T. Reyna Law, Offices of Bernard M. Gross, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Christopher B. Sanchez, Jennifer Wint

599 F.Supp.2d 493 (2009) In re MOODY'S CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 07 CV. 8375 (SWK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 23, 2009. *499 OPINION AND ORDER SHIRLEY WOHL KRAM, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND In this putative class action, the Teamsters Local 282 P

671 F.Supp.2d 467 (2009) In re INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION. Master File No. 21 MC 92. United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 5, 2009. *469 Stanley D. Bernstein, Esq., Rebecca M. Katz, Esq., Christian Siebott, Esq., Bernstein Liebhard LLP, Robert A. Wallner, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Safirste

ORDER W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the 14 January 2008 motion of plaintiff Charles Gilbert as the proposed class representative for class certification pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. On 16 July 2008, the remaining defendants, Red Hat, Inc. (“Red Hat”), Matthew Szulik, and Kevin Thompson, filed a response in opposition with supporting documentation.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. § STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § No. 181, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 12711

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YORK COUNTY ON BEHALF OF No. 22-15501 THE COUNTY OF YORK RETIREMENT FUND; MARYLAND D.C. No. ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY 4:20-cv-07835- PENSION FUND, Individually and on JSW Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HP, INC.; DION J. WEISLER; CATHERINE A. L

477 Argued and submitted November 16, 2020, a peremptory writ of mandamus shall issue August 5, 2021 William COX and Diosdada “Josie” Cox, Plaintiffs, v. HP INC., dba HP Computing and Printing, Inc., a foreign corporation; Charter Mechanical Contra

*682MEMORANDUM OPINION. AND ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT MOTIONS JACK ZOUHARY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Introduction The Direct Purchaser Class moves for final approval of six class settlements, entered into with Defendants FFP Holdings, LLC, Foamex Innovations, Inc., Future Foam, Inc., Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co.', Mohawk Industries

*1007ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, bring this action against Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) for alleged violations of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1750, et seq., and California’s Unfai

Per Curiam. Appellee HP Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Appellant Steven E. Berkheimer. Several motions for leave to file amici curiae briefs were also filed and granted. The petition, response, and amici curiae briefs were first referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter, to the circuit jud

FINAL ORDER APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS; OVERRULING PERRYMAN’S OBJECTIONS ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. On January 28, 2013, this Court heard plaintiffs Josué Romero, Gina Bailey, Jennifer Lawler, John Walters, Daniel Cox, Christopher Dickey, Grant Jenkins, and Bradley Berentson’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion

*580ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS AND INCENTIVE AWARD Re: Dkt. Nos. 141, 145 EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge The instant case is a putative class action suit brought by Representative Plaintiff Kha-lilah Wright (“Plaintiff’ or “Wright”

48 F.Supp.2d 958 (1999) In re SYBASE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Actions. No. C-95-1144 WHO. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 29, 1999. William S. Lerach, Patrick J. Coughlin, Randi D. Bandman, Henry Rosen, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, San Diego, CA, Lena C. Chang, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Iron Works Mid-South Pension Fund and Irving Lassoff (“Plaintiffs”), derivatively on behalf of Yahoo! Inc. (“Ya*1113hoo”), bring this action against Nominal Defendant Yahoo and ten individually named defendants who either served as audit c

EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This putative nation-wide class action suit arises out of Defendant HP Inc.'s ("HP") allegedly unlawful implementation of a firmware update that incapacitated thousands of HP printers and all-in-one devices (collectively "HP printers") and prevented the use of certain third-party ink cartridges in those printers. Plaintiffs Richard San

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. TRADOS Inc. (“Trados” or the “Company”) obtained venture capital in 2000 to support a growth strategy that could lead to an initial public offering. The VC firms received preferred stock and placed representatives on the Trados board of directors (the “Board”). Afterwards, Trados increased revenue year-over-year but failed to satisfy its VC backers. In 2004, the VC directors beg

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE AWARDS EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Class Plaintiffs filed four consolidated class actions against Defendant TracFone Wireless, alleging that TracFone sold “unlimited” data plans tha

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction On this motion to dismiss, plaintiff stockholders argue that they have stated a claim for breach of fiduciary duty because a controlling stockholder refused to consider an acquisition offer that would have cashed out all the minority stockholders of the defendant Synthes, Inc., but required the controlling stockholder to remain as an

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The morning of September 16, 2013 started as a typical Monday in the District *140 of Columbia. So it was at the Washington Navy Yard. While some headed to their offices or meetings, others drank their morning coffee