Cases

22-943 In re Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: October 3, 2023 Decided: February 1, 2024 No. 22-943 _____

03/18/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 2, 2021 Session IN RE SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-1169-IV Russell T. Perkins, Chancellor ___________________________________

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Lead Plaintiffs Stichting Pensioenfonds DSM Nederland (“DSM”), Indiana Treasurer of State, and Lloyd Crawford (together, “Plaintiffs”), bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated on the basis of a March 2010 Senior Notes Offering (“the Offering”) by Overseas Shipholding Group,

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The present case is a consolidated securities fraud class action brought on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities that purchased the publicly traded securities of Gentiva Health Services (“Gentiva”) between July 31, 2008 and October 4, 2011. Presently before the Court is the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth belo

469 F.Supp.2d 1346 (2006) In re WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION No. 1807. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. December 22, 2006. Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN and ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, Judges of the Panel.

MEMORANDUM & OPINION VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: In this putative class action, lead plaintiffs Gary Martin and Sandra Lee Reyes Troyer, and plaintiff Michael Yeo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendants Pretium Resources, Inc. (“Pretium”) and three individual Pretium officers— Robert Quartermain, Kenneth McNaughton, and Peter de Visser — violated Sections 10(b) and 20

*310MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The present case is a consolidated securities fraud class action brought on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities that purchased the publicly traded securities of Gentiva Health Services, Inc. (“Gentiva”) between July 31, 2008 and October 4, 2011. The complaint was filed by

*842OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs IBEW Local No. 58 Annuity Fund, Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund of IBEW Local No. 58, and IBEW Local No. 58 have filed a securities class action complaint against Defendants on behalf of all purchasers of EveryWare Global, I

*440 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Before the Court is the Motion for Class Certification of Lead Plaintiffs BIM Intermobiliare SGR (“BIM”), Robert Ahearn, and DRYE Custom Pallets (“DRYE”). Plaintiffs allege that the accounting firm Grant Thornton (“GT”) committed securities fraud in violation of § 10(b

*451 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Before the Court is the Motion for Class Certification of Lead Plaintiffs Hawaii Annuity Trust for Operating Engineers’ (“Hawaii”) and New England Carpenters Guaranteed Annuity Fund (“NE Carpenters”). In this suit, Lead Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, Sanofi and two of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a shareholder class action brought by Joseph Bradley, the City of Fort Lauderdale Police & Fire Retirement System, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers and Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, and William A. Gaul, D.M.D. (collectively, “the Lead Plaintiffs”), on behalf of thems

14‐4067‐cv(L) In re American International Group, Inc. Securities Litigation 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2015 6 7 (Argued: Febr

MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Lead plaintiff Bristol Investment Fund, Ltd. (“Bristol”) and plaintiff Joseph Gibbons (“Gibbons”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed an amended consolidated class action complaint (“CCAC”) after this Court dismissed Bristol’s amended complaint in full. Familiarity with the Court’s prior opinion is presumed.1 The Court now consid

607 S.E.2d 48 (2005) In re WACHOVIA SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. No. COA04-402. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 18, 2005. Wilson & Iseman, L.L.P., by G. Gray Wilson, Winston-Salem; Abbey Gardy, L.L.P., by Stephen T. Rodd, New York, NY, for Wachovia Shareholder plaintiff appellees. Wilson & Iseman, L.L.P., by Linda L. Helms, Winston-Salem, for Wachovia

826 F.Supp.2d 478 (2011) In re REFCO INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Kenneth M. Krys, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard Aaron, et al., Defendants. Nos. 07 MDL 1902 (JSR), 08 Civ. 7416 (JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 30, 2011. *487 ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, Dist

OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. The September 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”) disrupted the entire economy and greatly affected owners of the company’s securities. It led also to much litigation, including suits under the federal securities laws on behalf of purchasers of Lehman debt and equity securities. Almost all of the securities litigation ultim

753 F.Supp.2d 326 (2011) In re WACHOVIA EQUITY SECURITIES LITIGATION. Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Plaintiff, v. Wachovia Corporation, et al., Defendants. FC Holdings AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al., Defendants. In Re Wachovia Preferred Securities & Bond/Notes Litigation. Nos. 08 Civ. 6171(RJS), 09 Civ. 4473(RJS), 09 Civ. 5466(RJS), 09 Civ. 6351(RJS). <

MEMORANDUM OPINION LIAM O’GRADY, District Judge. At issue is Lead Plaintiffs Iowa Public *103Employees’ Retirement System1 and Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi2 (collectively, “Lead Plaintiffs”)’s Motion for Class Certification. On February 26, 2009, the Court he

Opinion and Order BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge. This case arises out of a massive fraud at Satyam Computer Services Ltd. (“Satyam” or the “Company”), involving thousands of forged invoices, business contracts-and bank statements, dual sets of account books, and SEC .filings overstating the Company’s assets by a total of more than $1 billion. Before the Court are motions to dismiss two related

524 F.Supp.2d 370 (2007) In re SCOTTISH RE GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 06 Civ. 5853(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 2, 2007. *371 *372 *373 *374 Max W. Berger, Esq., Salvatore J. Graziano, Esq.,