Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

USCA11 Case: 21-14098 Date Filed: 12/06/2021 Page: 1 of 94 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14098-JJ ___________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SE

USCA11 Case: 21-14098 Date Filed: 12/06/2021 Page: 1 of 94 [PUBLISH] CORRECTED In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14098-JJ ___________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DEPARTM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00022-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2025 10:33 PM No. 15-25-00022-CV CHRIST

USCA11 Case: 21-14269 Date Filed: 08/26/2022 Page: 1 of 66 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14269 ____________________ STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.,

Case: 23-40653 Document: 212-2 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________ January 17, 202

Case: 22-30019 Document: 00516582132 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 23–1145 Submitted April 11, 2024—Filed June 28, 2024 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., EMMA GOLDMAN CLINIC, and SARAH TRAXLER, Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA, and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Joseph Seidlin, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 23–1145 Submitted April 11, 2024—Filed June 28, 2024 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., EMMA GOLDMAN CLINIC, and SARAH TRAXLER, Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA, and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Joseph Seidlin, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law

Case: 24-50149 Document: 441-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/24/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 24, 2026

Case: 15-40238 Document: 00513286295 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/25/2015 REVISED November 25, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals __________ Fifth Circuit FILED

Case: 15-40238 Document: 00513264640 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals __________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 15-40238 November 9, 2015

Opinion of the Court by ACOBA, J. We hold first, that, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 658A-28(a) (Supp.2005), 2 which enumerates the appeals that “may” be taken from a court order concerning an arbitration proceeding, does not represent an exclusive list of appealable orders. Thus, although not lis

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

589 S.E.2d 797 (2003) 214 W.Va. 419 Gary DAILEY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, WEST VIRGINIA BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS; William F. Vieweg, Commissioner, Bureau of Employment Programs; and Executive Air Terminal, Inc., Respondents. No. 30730. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 23, 2003. Decided November 1

(Slip Opinion) Reimbursing the Attorney’s Fees of Current and Former Federal Employees Interviewed as Witnesses in the Mueller Investigation The Department of Justice Representation Guidelines authorize, on a case-by-case basis, the reimbursement of attorney’s fees incurred by a current or former federal govern- ment employee interviewed as a witness in the Mueller Investigation under threat of subpoena about information the person acquired in the course